19 Mar 2014 16:44:19
Just a quick one on the missing Malaysian plane.
Read somewhere that the plane may be carrying biological warfare material which was unloaded from a boat in the Seychelles and loaded onto this flight by members of the Trident Group.
This group are basically your hired guns for many countries when dealing with issues relying on deniable responsibility. Two of their operatives have been found killed in strange circumstances on board the ship they sailed into Seychelles with.
Something else I read somewhere stated that there were 4 flights to the US base in the Indian Ocean that delivered members of the CDC and the Chinese equivalent. Over the past fortnight there have been rumours that a commercial plane has been escorted to west coast US by USAAF jets as an exercise.
Possible scenario that I've been thinking about is that this chemical agent has either escaped in the hold or on the flight and has forced someone to control the plane remotely, landing it at the US base in the Indian Ocean. Before you laugh, I was reading a book on 9/11 that proved that the technology to hijack a plane in flight and control it completely has been around for some time. it was designed to "take back" control of a high jacked plane and land it at a field of the authorities choosing.
Imagine the mess politically and the Humanitarian fallout if it was discovered that maybe a country was transporting an illegal virus on a commercial flight. This is the reason why no-one is coming forward with positive ideas on where the plane is, better to let people believe its destroyed than explain what happened to it and what it was carrying.
Sorry if this is a little rambling at times - sometimes I've just got to go with the flow when I get these thoughts and start typing lol!
Any thoughts from our readers? Could this be a viable theory of what happened?
Tigerwhenroused
Anything is possible, certainly your theory.
Supasub
19 Mar 2014 20:11:51
Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 was in trouble and simply heading for the nearest safe airport when it turned off-course, according to a veteran pilot who predicts, in a viral online post, that the wreckage will be discovered somewhere west of the Maldives.
Chris Goodfellow, a Canadian pilot with 20 years experience, has hailed captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah a hero, not a hijacker, in his fascinating explanation, which claims to debunks all theories about the fate of the missing jet.
He insists the only reasonable scenario is that a fire broke out aboard the plane and Shah was doing exactly what he needed to do in an emergency - get the plane to the nearest airport as soon as possible.
In this case, that was the 13,000 foot strip Palau Langkawi, and that is directly where the aircraft was heading when it was last tracked. However, Goodfellow believes the crew were overcome by smoke and the aircraft flew as a 'ghost plane' for hours past the chosen airport before finally crashing into the Indian ocean.
Bep Kororoti
{Ed001's Note - and that would turn off the tracking system how? And affect them using the radios to let people know there was an issue? Makes no sense that 'explanation'.}
Ed- if there was an electrical fire in the communications system all contact would be lost! Bep.
{Ed001's Note - no it wouldn't. Try checking, they have back ups in case that happens.}
Unless both pilots were dead they would have chosen one of the following transponder settings.
75 - I'm staying alive (7500 Hijack)
76 - I'm in a fix (7600 Radio Failure)
77 - I'm going to heaven (7700 Mayday)
The captain has 20,000 hours. The transponder was switched off. He wouldn't do that unless he quite literally had a gun to his head. The pilots have oxygen masks so I find the overcome by smoke theory odd.
Ryan.
Bep
The Ram Air Turbine which will give basic electrical and hydraulic power in the event of an electrical failure.
All pilots are trained on how to fly the plane in the event of an electrical failure, and then some.
Ryan.
I find it hard to believe, that in this day and age they can lose track of an aeroplane, even cheap cars come with trackers, something very fishy about it.
{Ed033's Note - it's likely that a US government agency hijacked the plane.
Wow I like your theory as well as a few others tiger this plane's dissapearense "spelling" is really starting to whet the appetite more and more. cool.
19 Mar 2014 22:57:58
But for what reason is the big question. What do they want with an airliner and almost 300 people.
Kim Philby
{Ed033's Note - Just a guess but The US government agency could be holding 1 or more people to get another government to do something?
or maybe 1 or more people had special knowledge that the US government agency wanted to use or know.
Ed033 the amount of dis-info coming out is a very strong indicator as you suggested previously. One report had the aircraft descending to 25,000 feet from a cruise altitude of 41,000 feet after it turned 90 degrees left, but without the transponder it would only be possible to identify position.
Another report says residents of the Maldives heard a low flying airliner around 6. 15am. This is perfect if you want everyone to believe it landed at Diego Garcia. And it also suggests that only an organisation (government?) with enormous resources could invest in this level of deception, as it's likely to be a decoy aircraft.
What's your take on it so far Ed033?
Ryan.
{Ed033's Note - Please see my post above your post
19 Mar 2014 23:32:12
The majority are Chinese, they are not that sentimental. And if you wanted just one person you'd grab them on their own, not in transit on a plane with hundreds of others it draws too much attention. Its called a secret service for a reason. Even the Americans can't be that arrogant or reckless. Hmmm actually they could. I lean more towards the idea of something on the plane.
Kim Philby
{Ed033's Note - ok, a US government agency hijacked the plane because there was something on the plane or multiple people they wanted (for some reason) on the plane.
I have deliberately not commented on this subject for many reasons, waiting for more information etc etc, I think this hijacking of sorts is being played out for something much bigger, let's be honest about this is to public, when you have propaganda news like sky or the BBC all over it then they want our attention, while all eyes are drawn to this plane news important stuff is going on elsewhere, thus plane could be a sacrificial lamb and it would not surprise me if out of the blue they find the plane in the sea, case closed, I am very very skeptical of news sites on mainstream media and this is to divert our attention!
Sorry guys hoped that made sense? Hate writing posts of my mobile!
{Ed001's Note - I wouldn't worry franky, you have never made sense.}
19 Mar 2014 23:52:41
Editor sorry I do not mean to be dismissive of your theory just trying to puzzle it out. Its a lot of effort to go to for what appears to be small gain. There is something we are missing. This has taken a lot of planning and preparation. We're talking months here, waiting for the right conditions. Its a lot of noise and intelligence agencies like to hide in dark silent corners. Even using proxies. And assuming that it did go to DG that means military involvement. If you wanted someone dead you'd just blow it up and frame the arabs, ready made scapegoat. If you wanted to snatch someone there's a dozen easier quieter ways. It has to be something really important to warrant such an operation.
Kim Philby
20 Mar 2014 08:02:56
And there you go - media reporting that potential debris has been located at the extreme edge of Flight 370's range. The most telling part of the report to me was that Australian authorities were informed by none other than US Intelligence sources. If this is the case how come its taken a fortnight for this info to be released.
Always thought it strange that a plane can disappear from a high radar coverage area and that only one of the myriad spy satellites picked anything up. There seems to be a lot of red herrings and wild goose chases reported of searching north of the direction the flight was last reported heading.
As for why someone would take a plane of 300 people? Show of strength maybe? Look what we could do to anyone commercial fleet.
Personally, I think that something not someone was on board that flight that shouldn't have been. Maybe Trident was selling biological arms to China and it was stolen from US supplies? Seen wars started for less in history.
Well I'm now waiting for the whitewash story about there being a catastrophic failure on board and the plane hitting the sea when it rang out of fuel. This will be followed by showing us 3 or 4 pieces of wreckage that may or may not be the plane. (Pentagon plane on 9/11 anyone?)
Either the one or both of the pilots will be blamed for not following procedure or hailed as heroes for actions that they supposedly made.
As a side note - keep watching the news as I like the suggestion by another poster that this is a diversion while other more inflammatory stories are being played out. Just a thought - Russia invade Ukraine and then a civilian airline tragedy played out at the same time - the Sheeple love a good human interest story and well let's be honest - Ukraine isn't near them so that story is boring ain't it? (sorry sarcasm mode disengaged now).
Keep up the good work people, just remember its the authorities that want everyone to Be Pure, Be Vigilant but most of all Be Have :)
Sorry forgot to login or tag my post
Tigerwhenroused
Cheers edd I am on a high and enjoying the liverpool ride so nothing is going to make sense :)
20 Mar 2014 13:12:32
Tigerwhenroused, I take it you're a 2000AD fan?
Nice one Lucas! Was a fan many moons ago - surprised anyone remembered Nemesis :)
Tigerwhenroused
Really good forum in the link that I will post at the end of this, the forum is for professional pilots and even though a few but forward theories they are at a lost.
www.pprune.org/rumors-news-13/
Jonty
21 Mar 2014 14:30:05
There's still a few of us "old ones" around! Was more of a Torquemada fan myself, always preferred the baddies.