Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
15 Nov 2011 11:50:18
for all the zecharia sitchin followers , and i must admit i liked his stuff , have a look at - micheal heiser phd , who clearly shows that sitchin was a fraud , and indeed was no expert in any lingo, hes on youtube and he backs up what he says , a bit heavy -going , but truth is worth finding out about.
heres something else for the jews and germany thing , which i didnt know ,check out a 43 min show on youtube -a jewish defector warns america , by benjamin h freedman , around the 1960s .truth about ww1 , jews , great britain , all the ins and outs of how countrys and war are not quite what you were taught, and it tells why the germans turned on the jews, it was nothing to do with what you might think. ..................lfc
Can you give me a link lfc
{Ed033's Note - I have listened to this guy who says zecharia sitchin was a fraud. When sitchin first started talking about this information, a couple of people had a debate with him but always lost because he knew way more than they did on this subject. Obviously now zecharia sitchin is not with us it's easy to say anything about him.
The reason zecharia sitchin said some things that can't be backed up with anything was because he thought that he was channelling information from the entity / group of entities called Enki / EA. He then added this channelled information into his books on the subject. The only question is whether this channelled information is correct or incorrect.}
{Ed033's Note - I have listened to this guy who says zecharia sitchin was a fraud. When sitchin first started talking about this information, a couple of people had a debate with him but always lost because he knew way more than they did on this subject. Obviously now zecharia sitchin is not with us it's easy to say anything about him.
The reason zecharia sitchin said some things that can't be backed up with anything was because he thought that he was channelling information from the entity / group of entities called Enki / EA. He then added this channelled information into his books on the subject. The only question is whether this channelled information is correct or incorrect.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
The links are on youtube , just put in- micheal heister, sitchin , and - a jewish defector warns america , ed033 , i think heister tryed to debate sitchin for years , he stuided all this for 15 years or so , as much as it pains me to say he looks to be right , you would really have to look at what he says, shows about sitchin to come to a reasonable decision about it , as i say in these matters i find this happens a lot , but its up to everyone to it find out , and make up their own minds............lfc
{Ed033's Note - I'm not saying this michael guy is wrong, I have listened to him before for about 2 hours. All I said is that sitchin channelled the info that has nothing backing it up and we don't know including michael whether the channelled info is correct or not.}
{Ed033's Note - I'm not saying this michael guy is wrong, I have listened to him before for about 2 hours. All I said is that sitchin channelled the info that has nothing backing it up and we don't know including michael whether the channelled info is correct or not.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Read and heard a lot of the stuff about sitchins findings not to be as he translated. But a lot of other specialists in the field do translate an awful lot of the same things he did, with only slight differences. Plus, there is a tablet or writing in stone in the British museum of London which mentions a lot of the same stuff sitchin talks about, Anunnaki, the flood etc...
I also agree with ed! Very ease to cast doubt on someone who isn't around any longer to at least try and explain themselves and work.
Don't get me wrong, maybe he wasn't 100% correct on his 30 odd year work in this field, but he at least stumbled across a great alternative story to our being and origin.
Peace
Jay
I also agree with ed! Very ease to cast doubt on someone who isn't around any longer to at least try and explain themselves and work.
Don't get me wrong, maybe he wasn't 100% correct on his 30 odd year work in this field, but he at least stumbled across a great alternative story to our being and origin.
Peace
Jay
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Agree , what is interesting is the sitchin or more important the clay texts , anicent bible and other various writing , putting it all together , its clear to see mankind was put here by angels , superhumans , people much like us , or other agents , the real problem we have is the unseen spirt world , as ed033 said sitchen , believed in channelling , and when i look at the occult , forbidden knowledge, right up to mordern times top people , governments , and a lot of the ufo stuff is from this , which also begs the question were did these writers in the old bible texts get some of the imformation, =ie - a angel of the lord etc , its very interesting and the more you look into it the more you just know that there's more to mankinds history than what the mainstream say............lfc
{Ed033's Note - According to John Lash, 20% of the Nag Hammadi texts talk about a group of ETs called Archons.}
{Ed033's Note - According to John Lash, 20% of the Nag Hammadi texts talk about a group of ETs called Archons.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0