Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
29 Dec 2019 21:22:37
NASA Documents state they assume Earth is flat and non rotating.
30 Dec 2019 11:39:54
If you were anywhere on a flat earth, and its was sunny. Would it not be sunny everywhere on that flat earth?
If you were anywhere on a flat earth, and its was sunny. Would it not be sunny everywhere on that flat earth?
{Ed033's Note - Maybe looking at these series of videos might help you comprehend:
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
30 Dec 2019 17:21:38
Cheers, Ed. Knew you'd have a, albeit mind-bending, plausible explanation up your sleeve.
Cheers, Ed. Knew you'd have a, albeit mind-bending, plausible explanation up your sleeve.
{Ed033's Note - You could install The Flat Earth Sun, Moon & Zodiac Clock app on your Mobile Phone (costs $3)
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
31 Dec 2019 10:12:50
So, hypothetically speaking. If the flat earth dome system existed. Pretty much everything we have been told is fake.
Is everything outside the dome real? or a projection onto said dome? .
Gravity or the effect of the force we know as gravity, would become very complex to explain with what would become defunct main stream science.
I have spent a very, very long time outside in the cold, looking at, and collecting digital camera data from such named objects as M51, horsehead nebulae etc etc. I'm going to be pretty pissed if it turns out I was taking an image, of an image. haha :)
So, hypothetically speaking. If the flat earth dome system existed. Pretty much everything we have been told is fake.
Is everything outside the dome real? or a projection onto said dome? .
Gravity or the effect of the force we know as gravity, would become very complex to explain with what would become defunct main stream science.
I have spent a very, very long time outside in the cold, looking at, and collecting digital camera data from such named objects as M51, horsehead nebulae etc etc. I'm going to be pretty pissed if it turns out I was taking an image, of an image. haha :)
{Ed033's Note - How do you have a vacuum (the alleged vacuum of outer space) directly next to our atmosphere / atmospheric pressure? unless one of them is inside a container.
Try creating a vacuum anywhere on the surface of Earth. Can't be done unless you have the vacuum in a container. Then try recreating a pocket of atmosphere / atmospheric pressure inside that vacuum without it also being in its own container.
Also, If you take a Nikon P900 camera and zoom into any 'star' in 'outer space' (luminary is a better word for star), this is the type of thing you see:
Try creating a vacuum anywhere on the surface of Earth. Can't be done unless you have the vacuum in a container. Then try recreating a pocket of atmosphere / atmospheric pressure inside that vacuum without it also being in its own container.
Also, If you take a Nikon P900 camera and zoom into any 'star' in 'outer space' (luminary is a better word for star), this is the type of thing you see:
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
31 Dec 2019 12:19:10
The vacuum argument has me perplexed, Ed. The main stream answer would be gravity does it. Yet this doesn't make sense as gravity is weak and the force of which is easily counteracted by ourselves by the mere act of picking something up. If the same said object was the seal of a vacuum that was fixed point. The force used to break the vacuum would be exponentially greater than, that of gravity. So, by that very thought experiment, the system is flawed. And as you suggest, the atmosphere would be instantly ripped away.
I have seen the light show that is what we know as stars. And yeah its puzzling, but I have always put this down to atmospheric conditions being turbulent. That's the narrative we are taught anyway. Having looked at the moon a lot, you see whatever this effect is, very clearly. Almost like watching something through crystal clear waters. Having dabbled in the world of parachuting/ paragliding I have been trained to think of air acting the same way as water. So this effect of the moon and stars has up until now, always made sense.
The vacuum argument has me perplexed, Ed. The main stream answer would be gravity does it. Yet this doesn't make sense as gravity is weak and the force of which is easily counteracted by ourselves by the mere act of picking something up. If the same said object was the seal of a vacuum that was fixed point. The force used to break the vacuum would be exponentially greater than, that of gravity. So, by that very thought experiment, the system is flawed. And as you suggest, the atmosphere would be instantly ripped away.
I have seen the light show that is what we know as stars. And yeah its puzzling, but I have always put this down to atmospheric conditions being turbulent. That's the narrative we are taught anyway. Having looked at the moon a lot, you see whatever this effect is, very clearly. Almost like watching something through crystal clear waters. Having dabbled in the world of parachuting/ paragliding I have been trained to think of air acting the same way as water. So this effect of the moon and stars has up until now, always made sense.
{Ed033's Note - I wonder whether the atomic/nuclear blast tests in the upper atmosphere is them trying to blow a hole in / crack the 'Dome' above us.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
31 Dec 2019 14:11:18
They would probably think it was a good idea and be stupid enough to try. Has there been any recent updates on what HAARP is up to?
My yt searches just bring up the opposite of what I'm trying to find these days. Is there anyway of searching yt without using their search algorithms? a back door so to speak.
They would probably think it was a good idea and be stupid enough to try. Has there been any recent updates on what HAARP is up to?
My yt searches just bring up the opposite of what I'm trying to find these days. Is there anyway of searching yt without using their search algorithms? a back door so to speak.
{Ed033's Note - HAARP, i don't know, but they probably bounce frequencies off the Dome.
I don't know of any alternative Youtube search.
I don't know of any alternative Youtube search.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
