Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
21 Aug 2013 23:33:38
Risk of dying from cancer approx 1 in 4.
The odds of dying in a terrorist incident in the last decade are 1 in 10, 408, 947. By contrast, the odds of being struck by lightning are about 1 in 500,000. You could board 20 flights per year and still be less likely to be the subject of an attempted terrorist attack than to be struck by lightning.
Why is cancer research funded mainly by charity? Why are we surrendering our liberty to more anti terror laws? Why do the govt spend billions of taxpayers money fighting 'terror'?
Its time to wake up people.
MrTrotskysGhost
I understand your logic but if they stop trying to prevent terrorism the odds will decrease you can't prevent a lightning strike or an illness
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Powerful pharmaceutical companies make too much money treating cancer that they will never allow the government will never dip into their own pocket to find a cure.
Plus, the Government already know that a cure exists so there's no point funding a research program that will only end up being swept under the carpet.
I, along with many others, think that the cure for cancer has been found but radiotherapy/ chemotherapy/ tablets etc. generate billions and billions of pounds and that's why the cure has never been made public.
I think it's Franky who always says 'When was the last time some one high up died of cancer?'.
It's treatable but why would these massive, profit-oriented companies want to cure an illness while they can screw the public for a pay day?
The same can be said for other diseases and illnesses such as HIV/Aids too, IMO.
ConspiracyKen
Plus, the Government already know that a cure exists so there's no point funding a research program that will only end up being swept under the carpet.
I, along with many others, think that the cure for cancer has been found but radiotherapy/ chemotherapy/ tablets etc. generate billions and billions of pounds and that's why the cure has never been made public.
I think it's Franky who always says 'When was the last time some one high up died of cancer?'.
It's treatable but why would these massive, profit-oriented companies want to cure an illness while they can screw the public for a pay day?
The same can be said for other diseases and illnesses such as HIV/Aids too, IMO.
ConspiracyKen
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
