If you have read some of the post on this site implies that you are interested in some of the views? personally if i think something is a load of rubbish i would not be on the site reading it and second i would deffo not bothering posting a comment.your in denial my friend .
frankyscouse
Latest replies
Hi edd's i reckon this site is really good some of the post's are real eye openers.You must be both blind and a little crazy not to think otherwise!
redblancmonge {Ed001's Note - I can understand someone saying they don't believe a lot of it, but there are some things even the most blinkered of people have to accept are conspiracies. Just look at all the years we were told margarine was the healthy option, even though they knew it wasn't all along.}
Read discussionredblancmonge {Ed001's Note - I can understand someone saying they don't believe a lot of it, but there are some things even the most blinkered of people have to accept are conspiracies. Just look at all the years we were told margarine was the healthy option, even though they knew it wasn't all along.}
On a slightly seperate note, listening to Radio 5 today (and someone else hear will be able to give more detail) heard brieflt discussed that apparently some scientist(s) have found that there is no evidence that mobile phone's have any link to cancer.
Yet last year 31 top scientist's voted 29-2 in favour of mobile phone's being considered as potentially carcinogenic.
They considered that use over 10 year's at approximately 2 hours a day could increase the risk of cancer. Now does that include internet use also on multifunction phones/ Ipads etc as 2 hours a day becomes a smaller amount in theory. Would anyone here know? I'm not sure about any of it but everything that comes out seems to be contradictory.
I've seen evidence years ago of workmen who developed tumor's say in the same area as they kept their phone's in their pockets or on their belt's.
Supasub
Read discussionYet last year 31 top scientist's voted 29-2 in favour of mobile phone's being considered as potentially carcinogenic.
They considered that use over 10 year's at approximately 2 hours a day could increase the risk of cancer. Now does that include internet use also on multifunction phones/ Ipads etc as 2 hours a day becomes a smaller amount in theory. Would anyone here know? I'm not sure about any of it but everything that comes out seems to be contradictory.
I've seen evidence years ago of workmen who developed tumor's say in the same area as they kept their phone's in their pockets or on their belt's.
Supasub
Yes I fully understand your point and I am wary of many things in this world, but I think we mostly all damage our bodies far more in other ways these days with alcohol smoking fast food caffene etc..... As Ive said before I am open minded but I dont worry so much about this issue, the hospitals are in financial dire straights as it is and making the governments look bad without them giving us all gut rot I reakon. If peope want to worry about fluride thats fine, its their choice to brush their teeth with toothpaste but dont go breathing near me !
Matt_RFC {Ed001's Note - toothpaste doesn't need to have flouride to clean your teeth, it certainly has no effect on your breath. There are toothpastes on the market that are flouride free.}
Read discussionMatt_RFC {Ed001's Note - toothpaste doesn't need to have flouride to clean your teeth, it certainly has no effect on your breath. There are toothpastes on the market that are flouride free.}
In tests over the years, adverse effects to fluride have been in the stomach, there is a correct term for what it can give you but for arguments sake, it can give you the sh*ts. There is no evidence to suggest it 'dumbs' you that is of any significance.
Matt_RFC {Ed001's Note - there was no evidence aspartame was harmful according to tests. Funny how tests can manage to not find evidence that would cost large corporations money isn't it?}
Read discussionMatt_RFC {Ed001's Note - there was no evidence aspartame was harmful according to tests. Funny how tests can manage to not find evidence that would cost large corporations money isn't it?}
I do realise there is dangers from anything with any toxidity content but it is in such mynute doses that it wont have an effect unless you swap butter for toothpaste and start eating minty ham sandwiches with mercury sauce.
Matt_RFC {Ed001's Note - how do you know that? Aspartame is in minute doses, but there is a hell of a lot of circumstantial evidence to suggest it causes major harm to the body.}
Read discussionMatt_RFC {Ed001's Note - how do you know that? Aspartame is in minute doses, but there is a hell of a lot of circumstantial evidence to suggest it causes major harm to the body.}
Stephen Fry is an outstandingly intelligent accademic but still of flawed character ie has made some bad decisions in his life regarding drug use etc. Does that mean because of him cocaine consumption doesn't effect you?
Doesn't mean anything either way Matt but I see the point your making.
Supasub
Read discussionDoesn't mean anything either way Matt but I see the point your making.
Supasub
Can I confirm please thatStephen Fry has drunk our tap water and used toothpaste all his life.
Seriously guys there are all sorts of chemicals and natural substances that may make our bodies or brains slightly slower for a period, but then there are ones that speed it up and make it more alert like coffee. This conspiricy is right up there with reptillian overlords and planet X. Sorry, and this is coming from someone who has been interested conspiricy theories for 15 or so years. Ps the federal researve had JFK executed and 911 was a controled demolition organised by the global financial elite, and the governments run/organise/profit from the global drugs trade, now these are real stop faffing about thinking about with the daft ones :) !
Matt_RFC {Ed001's Note - you do realise that flouride is a toxic chemical right? That is not in question. The only question is what effect it actually does have on us? That is something we still don't really know, nor will it be easy to find out for certain, due to the fact we imbibe so many other chemicals during our lives.}
Read discussionSeriously guys there are all sorts of chemicals and natural substances that may make our bodies or brains slightly slower for a period, but then there are ones that speed it up and make it more alert like coffee. This conspiricy is right up there with reptillian overlords and planet X. Sorry, and this is coming from someone who has been interested conspiricy theories for 15 or so years. Ps the federal researve had JFK executed and 911 was a controled demolition organised by the global financial elite, and the governments run/organise/profit from the global drugs trade, now these are real stop faffing about thinking about with the daft ones :) !
Matt_RFC {Ed001's Note - you do realise that flouride is a toxic chemical right? That is not in question. The only question is what effect it actually does have on us? That is something we still don't really know, nor will it be easy to find out for certain, due to the fact we imbibe so many other chemicals during our lives.}
{Ed033's Note - The Dangers Of Fluoride and Water Fluoridation
Read discussionBecause its in our drinking water.
But does anyone know if prolonged use of a non-fluoride toothpaste and avoidance of tap-water would make any diifference to someone in their 20's, 30's, 40's etc when someone has already had alot of exposure?
Supasub
{Ed033's Note - If any proper studies have been done, then it has not been communicated to the people through the government. So there's something wrong there. If no proper studies have been done, there's something wrong as well. Fluoride doesn't just effect intelligence level. There are multiple negative side effects. The one that the controllers like is that it pacifies people. This is why fluoride was added to the Nazi concentration camps. Fluoride possibly has a cumulative effect like mobile phones. The more times you use a mobile phone, the more holes you get in your brain.
Fluoride allegedly increases infertility and will cake-up the pineal gland in the brain. Fluoride allows aluminium to pass into the brain through the blood-brain barrier which can cause Alzheimer's disease.
Originally the aluminium industry had an expensive hard time getting rid of the fluoride they used in the making of aluminium as this fluoride is a health risk to humans. Allegedly, there is no evidence that drinking fluoridated water is good for the teeth. Now the aluminium industry sells the fluoride and this is possibly poisonous to humans. If a child swallows toothpaste they could die because of the fluoride in the toothpaste.
Read discussionBut does anyone know if prolonged use of a non-fluoride toothpaste and avoidance of tap-water would make any diifference to someone in their 20's, 30's, 40's etc when someone has already had alot of exposure?
Supasub
{Ed033's Note - If any proper studies have been done, then it has not been communicated to the people through the government. So there's something wrong there. If no proper studies have been done, there's something wrong as well. Fluoride doesn't just effect intelligence level. There are multiple negative side effects. The one that the controllers like is that it pacifies people. This is why fluoride was added to the Nazi concentration camps. Fluoride possibly has a cumulative effect like mobile phones. The more times you use a mobile phone, the more holes you get in your brain.
Fluoride allegedly increases infertility and will cake-up the pineal gland in the brain. Fluoride allows aluminium to pass into the brain through the blood-brain barrier which can cause Alzheimer's disease.
Originally the aluminium industry had an expensive hard time getting rid of the fluoride they used in the making of aluminium as this fluoride is a health risk to humans. Allegedly, there is no evidence that drinking fluoridated water is good for the teeth. Now the aluminium industry sells the fluoride and this is possibly poisonous to humans. If a child swallows toothpaste they could die because of the fluoride in the toothpaste.
Never been sure about Argos. Apparently it's got everything in it...........but you can't see it. Oooooh.
Supasub
Read discussionSupasub
Thats because argos marketing team were sat down by FBI, MI6 and revealed to them the existince of alien life form far from our galaxy and advised them to prepare their customers for contact. My aunt works there and she was told by her CEO. Creepy stuff man.
Read discussionActually not taking the piss.im on this website everyday and iam in to all the conspiracy stuff.i just find that advert strange as if to familiarize people with what the greys look like.DORSET RED
Read discussionNothing proved CASE CLOSED...
with him inside..
Read discussionwith him inside..
Here is something else to think about: ameirca is a "sue" happy country. Why did none of the family of the people allegedly on the planes sue the airlines. This happens all the time in america. Remember the woman who sued McDonald's because she spilt hot coffee on herself? She was awarded $5,000,000.
an american red
Read discussionan american red
Russian spies were after him so he hid his body just in case lol
JWalk
Read discussionJWalk
Obviously Argos are the illuminati and are trying to symbollically tell us something ;) tbh if its the one im thinking of its just an advert and tbh i just think your taking the piss.
JWalk
Read discussionJWalk
There was no planes crashing, its a case of a few thousand death threats, a few billion stupid people, some ropey doctored footage and some pre-planned explosions.
LIAM
Read discussionLIAM
Couldn't agree more ED033. BTW there are couple of good videos on youtube about Dr Judy Woods theory on DEWs used on 9/11. Search "where did the towers go". Thought provoking stuff
{Ed033's Note - There were a number of military drills going on on 9/11 to confuse the military as well.
Yes, the only proper investigation into 9/11 is Judy Wood PHd's book, Where did the towers go
Read discussion{Ed033's Note - There were a number of military drills going on on 9/11 to confuse the military as well.
Yes, the only proper investigation into 9/11 is Judy Wood PHd's book, Where did the towers go
Dr. Judy Wood being interviewed on her book on Richplanet by Richard D. Hall
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=76&part=1
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=76&part=2
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=76&part=3
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=78&part=1
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=78&part=2
www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=78&part=3
Another Interview with Judy Wood PHd on Edge Media about Directed Energy Technology Used On 9/11 to cause the twin towers to turn to dust before our eyes
I saw the documentary, purely out of interest. It was mainstream tripe. Showed the ineptitude of the US Military, including some interviews, played recordings of Air Traffic Controllers and some conversations with Airline staff supposedly on the planes.
It was interesting only in the fact that it highlighted how bad the military were at responding to it, perhaps given mis-information by others?
KPS
Read discussionIt was interesting only in the fact that it highlighted how bad the military were at responding to it, perhaps given mis-information by others?
KPS
