Latest replies

I see signs of a genetic supremacy every time i look in the mirror mates. A pure specimen.

RAZ have you just had a toke then watched
X-MEN First class ?
JR

There is no , repeat no new imformation ever added to genes through time , only a lost of imformation , think of the oringal two humans , then think of a photo-copyier - as each copy of the oringal is made, it becomes sightly less than the oringal , hence you get mistakes , disformaities etc , indeed even a virus becomes resitenant to modern medicines through loss of imformation , not adding any , now we can see we are, if anything just a far weaker copy of the oringal , but who made the oringal or upgraded a more primative man , now thats why we are all looking into the old texts, books, legends..............lfc

If we humans have been genetically tweaked multiple times as suggested what Raz said originally would make sense

Yeah, you're right about the bad breeding. The royalty in-breed so much that they are inferior.

Would people say they are in favour or against the movement ? i personally am but i am quite curious about everyone else .. {Ed033's Note - As long as they are on the people's side, I am in favour of them.}

Nope never heard of that. Was it beside the Aron Islands

Irish Red {Ed033's Note - No further southwest of the Aran Islands. The island of hy-brasil is under the sea now.}

Who is it?

Anonymous Movement is a group, spread through the Internet, initiating active civil disobedience, while attempting to maintain anonymity. Originating in 2003 on the imageboard 4chan, the term refers to the concept of many online community users simultaneously existing as an anarchic, chaotic, global brain. It is also generally considered to be a blanket term for members of certain Internet subcultures, a way to refer to the actions of people in an environment where their actual identities are not known.

Isn't it Blackbeard's treasure? Tunnels have been rigged to flow into any excavation making it impossible to dig right down. It is a really clever network.

Adam

I do agree with a lot you have said. Nearly all games that children play are about survival and killing etc, Manhunt, Hide & Seak.

It is only natural that we will play with toy guns and swors because of the reasons you have suggested.

However, these games aren't filled with propaganda, whereas things like Call of Duty are loaded with it. Likewise, we don't actually 'kill' when playing Manhunt or shooting someone with a toy gun. In contrast, Call of Duty, or kids games such as Mario has a format which is, 'kill and you survive'. In essence it is all true to our nature, as you say, but when we follow through the actions you could argue it makes us immune to the idea of killing something/somebody.

That's just my take. Either way, it is quite sad really that we can't 'evolve' out of our natural desires, because the fact is, we don't NEED to kill anymore in order to survive.

Adam

Raz , did you know a new born baby loses 50 per cent of its brain cells ,simply because of the air we breath , maybe nasa are right , that thousands of years ago the air was purer , would explain why aminals people and plants were so much bigger at the start of recored history...........lfc

Forgive me for stoking the fire, and please know I don't disagree with what anyone is saying about this, but I just want to put forward a different angle.

We are a product of nature (well...if some theories on this page are not true after all....but that's for another convo...) and we all have instincts and surprisingly primitive traits despite being an 'advanced' species.

We are territorial and, born without natural weapons, we have learned to construct weapons. For thousands and thousands of years since the dawn of time, human species have made weapons out of whatever resources they can. Do not be fooled into thinking this is purely for hunting. In fact, revolutions such as the iron and bronze ages were based on or started by the desire to manufacture weapons. Humans have an intrinsic need to have ownership of something, and to protect it, rather than simply abandoning that which is taken from them. So we have an built-in will to fight when necessary. To the death if needs be.

So since the dawn of man, children have been taught to use weapons for killing animals and people just as they have been taught to use tools.

So really, are these video games 'desensitising' us? Is this not just a continuation of themes that have been with us since the dawn of man? It is a fact that humans are lazy - almost every single technological advance has been invented in order to make something easier, and now people can learn how to aim and shoot, act stealthily, think tactically etc, from the comfort of their sofa. I don't think being 'desensitised' to killing a threat to your own life is a bad thing, in fact it is a perfectly natural albeit somewhat primitive facet of behaviour, is it not?

Whether or not video games are bad in this respect is surely just as relevant as, say, one's upbringing? And one's learning of what is right and wrong? I do not know anyone who in their right mind would be happy or willing to kill because they had a lifetime of video game playing.

AT the end of the day people liek realistic games, and this means war games. Not games like Resistance and Halo where aliens are everywhere, but games where you get to sue real technology and you can imitate the soldiers of today - typical kids' heroes.

So although I see where you're coming from, I think it's too easy to say 'they're desensitising us!' when in actual fact this sort of thing has been in our nature since day one.

Raz

You don't need to look into human origins conspiracy theories to know that there are genetically superior humans than others. All you need to do is look around you and it's pretty blooming obvious. Never heard of 'bad breeding'?

I like the theory of something being down there, why would some one or thing build this just for fun ?? treasure, arc of the covenent, secrets, alien tech.......i could go on, send master chief in he'll sort it.......matty b

LMAO. Look up Seattle 1999. It's clear what they're for.

Len

Think the only way to ever get to the bottom of it is take the sea back half a mile off the island and that would cost too much money , i think theres 3 tunnels running off onto the sea , if they keep drilling down into the island itself there will be nothing left of it but big potholes all over the place............lfc

Cheers Ed just thought i'd throw an example in there.

So JR your only allowed to be into conspiracies if your not a Tory?

So labour never screwed the country over?

And what the hell is face shining?

Or more likely its just planning for the next disaster? After something like Katrina they were caught short weren't they. {Ed033's Note - yes, that's part of what I said.}