20 Jan 2021 17:30:54
This is the alleged plan of the group behind Trump - The Corporation known as United States has been dissolved, the military temporarily takeover until March 2021, then Trump comes back in as the 19th President of the American Republic?
Apparently the flag above the Whitehouse has been taken down, which allegedly signifies the Military are in power.
Latest replies
20 Jan 2021 11:13:14
Cheers Bluey, really enjoyed that.
Read discussionCheers Bluey, really enjoyed that.
20 Jan 2021 14:10:30
I'm not saying this to cause trouble (I've been reading this page for years), but I think it's wishful thinking all of this.
The Hunter photos were doing the rounds on twitter long ago. Nothing has come of it. Then there were the rumours about Trump laying a trap regarding the election, nothing came of it. Charlie and Simon said they're 95% sure Trump will be the next president. He's just left the Whitehouse.
I just think this has done more harm than good for conspiracy theorists. Constant promises of things about to happen. It's made a mockery out of anyone who questions what they're fed. If I didn't know better I'd say Trump is in on it and did it to shut down free thought.
Read discussionI'm not saying this to cause trouble (I've been reading this page for years), but I think it's wishful thinking all of this.
The Hunter photos were doing the rounds on twitter long ago. Nothing has come of it. Then there were the rumours about Trump laying a trap regarding the election, nothing came of it. Charlie and Simon said they're 95% sure Trump will be the next president. He's just left the Whitehouse.
I just think this has done more harm than good for conspiracy theorists. Constant promises of things about to happen. It's made a mockery out of anyone who questions what they're fed. If I didn't know better I'd say Trump is in on it and did it to shut down free thought.
19 Jan 2021 22:55:24
Far from it from what I have seen China has sent 3 hard drives over showing Hunter biden with underage girls also showing that biden along with the CCP rigged the election also rumours swirling round the CIA headquarters has been raided by the marines with thousands of documents being seized showing Hilary Clinton rigged the election in 2016 and had discussed (caught on tape) arranging the murder of judges it's going to go off big time if true.
Read discussionFar from it from what I have seen China has sent 3 hard drives over showing Hunter biden with underage girls also showing that biden along with the CCP rigged the election also rumours swirling round the CIA headquarters has been raided by the marines with thousands of documents being seized showing Hilary Clinton rigged the election in 2016 and had discussed (caught on tape) arranging the murder of judges it's going to go off big time if true.
20 Jan 2021 00:30:06
The exaggerated military presence in DC, for what is now a virtual event, along with the personnel changes at FEMA and the DHS within the past week or so, indicate that something big may happen tomorrow.
Read discussionThe exaggerated military presence in DC, for what is now a virtual event, along with the personnel changes at FEMA and the DHS within the past week or so, indicate that something big may happen tomorrow.
19 Jan 2021 19:28:27
Wow ok will look into that ty.
Read discussionWow ok will look into that ty.
19 jan 2021 14:31:58
game of football anyone? . three liars on the shirt song.
url: bitchute.com/video/tbEWyOnJUEWQ/
Read discussiongame of football anyone? . three liars on the shirt song.
url: bitchute.com/video/tbEWyOnJUEWQ/
19 jan 2021 14:31:56
u.s. major general william walker - "peaceful transition to military power"
url: bitchute.com/video/uCaQ86j2ilF0/
Read discussionu.s. major general william walker - "peaceful transition to military power"
url: bitchute.com/video/uCaQ86j2ilF0/
19 Jan 2021 14:31:54
Hi Ed033, Ladies and Gentlemen. I have made no secret of the fact Trump and Biden are two sides of same Roman coin. There are many theories going around about 20/ 1/ 21 inauguration. I just can't get away from the fact Zionism is Globalism in itself. Noahide Laws are very frightening if you dig deep.
Very prominent Zionists and Zionist Puppets in place throughout the World. Pompeo, Pence, Trump, David Steele ( ex CIA ) . Bojo, Tommy Robinson and many more. I will post a few videos and sites alluding to the fact. FEMA Zionist controlled? Who are the FEMA camps really for? Military controlled NWO. Centralised Digital Currency? We will soon see. Oh yes Zionism is Satanism too.
exposetheenemy.com
url: bitchute.com/video/q8dF3RCdTAsi/
Read discussionHi Ed033, Ladies and Gentlemen. I have made no secret of the fact Trump and Biden are two sides of same Roman coin. There are many theories going around about 20/ 1/ 21 inauguration. I just can't get away from the fact Zionism is Globalism in itself. Noahide Laws are very frightening if you dig deep.
Very prominent Zionists and Zionist Puppets in place throughout the World. Pompeo, Pence, Trump, David Steele ( ex CIA ) . Bojo, Tommy Robinson and many more. I will post a few videos and sites alluding to the fact. FEMA Zionist controlled? Who are the FEMA camps really for? Military controlled NWO. Centralised Digital Currency? We will soon see. Oh yes Zionism is Satanism too.
exposetheenemy.com
url: bitchute.com/video/q8dF3RCdTAsi/
19 Jan 2021 10:59:53
Apparently In Poland, restaurants temporarily hire each customer for the duration of their dinner as a food taster / food control person and are therefore legally allowed to open and serve food.
Read discussionApparently In Poland, restaurants temporarily hire each customer for the duration of their dinner as a food taster / food control person and are therefore legally allowed to open and serve food.
19 Jan 2021 08:40:56
So £7000 was the the first payout from a company [service provider] for trying to force a no mask no entry company policy. Here is a pdf file that could be the template letter that led to the £7000.
Dear Sir / Madam
Equality Act 2010 Letter Before Claim – Disability Discrimination arising
from your company’s reaction to me being unable to wear a face covering
This is a pre-action letter for disability discrimination.
I have the following condition(s):
[list of medical conditions]
These have a substantial impact on my life and so I have the protected
characteristic of disability as defined in Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
My condition means I am unable to wear a face covering.
[Outline here more of what happened – include quotes from staff and how it
made you feel / any damage to your health – make sure you give dates and
times, the location of the incident(s) and, if you know the identity of any
perpetrators, also include them here].
Your attention is drawn to the press release of 24 July 2020 from the
Government which references more detailed Guidance you are encouraged to familiarise yourself with:
I was following the rules when entering your premises unmasked. I am entitled
not to wear a face covering to protect my health and well-being. The response
of your staff outlined above was, however, outside the rules and, more seriously,
unlawful as explained below.
As a service provider you must not discriminate against me.
Section 29 Provision of services, etc.
(1) A person (a “service-providerâ€) concerned with the provision of a service to the public or a section of the public (for payment or not) must not discriminate against a person requiring the service by not providing the person with the service.
(2) A service-provider (A) must not, in providing the service, discriminate against a
person (B) -
(a) as to the terms on which A provides the service to B;
(b) by terminating the provision of the service to B;
(c) by subjecting B to any other detriment.
Additionally, under Section 13 (1) A person (A) discriminates against another (B)
if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or
would treat others.
And Section 15 provides me with extra protection against discrimination arising in
consequence of my disability.
And there is also a special rule for discrimination cases: if I can prove some of the facts, you will then have to prove there was no discrimination. This is sometimes called 'shifting the burden of proof'.
It is set out in section 136 of the Equality Act 2010:
Section 136 Burden of proof
(1) This section applies to any proceedings relating to a contravention of this Act.
(2) If there are facts from which the court could decide, in the absence of any other
explanation, that a person (A) contravened the provision concerned, the court must hold
that the contravention occurred.
(3) But subsection (2) does not apply if A shows that A did not contravene the provision.
The disability discrimination you perpetrated against me is covered by the Vento Scale
as outlined in the Equality and Human Rights Commission Guidance regarding the
value of discrimination claims. You can find it here:
The Commission indicates the lower band of £900 to £8,600 is for one off cases.
However, the lower band was revised to £900 - £9,000 for the financial year we are
now in. In considering the level of compensation that applies the Commission states
the following,
"While the court will assess the award of damages for injury to feelings in an objective
way, the perception and the individual reaction of the claimant will be an important
factor for the court to consider. The more upsetting the conduct is to the individual, the more seriously the discrimination is likely to be viewed by the court, and the higher the award for injury to feelings. Where a one-off act of discrimination is particularly humiliating or serious and the victim suffers serious consequences as a result, an award in the higher bands could be justified...".
And,
"Where the discrimination happens in a public place in front of a number of members
of the public, and so is more likely to be considered as humiliating...".
As well as being committed in public, the discrimination committed caused me
substantial distress.
I therefore seek £XXXX to settle this case along with specific information regarding
how you will ensure that no further incidents can occur.
I trust you will take this opportunity to remedy matters. You are reminded that under the Civil Procedure Rules you are required to engage in constructive communication to minimise any possible need for assistance from the
County Court.
I look forward to hearing from you with proposals for settlement within the next 14
days.
Yours faithfully,
Read discussionSo £7000 was the the first payout from a company [service provider] for trying to force a no mask no entry company policy. Here is a pdf file that could be the template letter that led to the £7000.
Dear Sir / Madam
Equality Act 2010 Letter Before Claim – Disability Discrimination arising
from your company’s reaction to me being unable to wear a face covering
This is a pre-action letter for disability discrimination.
I have the following condition(s):
[list of medical conditions]
These have a substantial impact on my life and so I have the protected
characteristic of disability as defined in Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
My condition means I am unable to wear a face covering.
[Outline here more of what happened – include quotes from staff and how it
made you feel / any damage to your health – make sure you give dates and
times, the location of the incident(s) and, if you know the identity of any
perpetrators, also include them here].
Your attention is drawn to the press release of 24 July 2020 from the
Government which references more detailed Guidance you are encouraged to familiarise yourself with:
I was following the rules when entering your premises unmasked. I am entitled
not to wear a face covering to protect my health and well-being. The response
of your staff outlined above was, however, outside the rules and, more seriously,
unlawful as explained below.
As a service provider you must not discriminate against me.
Section 29 Provision of services, etc.
(1) A person (a “service-providerâ€) concerned with the provision of a service to the public or a section of the public (for payment or not) must not discriminate against a person requiring the service by not providing the person with the service.
(2) A service-provider (A) must not, in providing the service, discriminate against a
person (B) -
(a) as to the terms on which A provides the service to B;
(b) by terminating the provision of the service to B;
(c) by subjecting B to any other detriment.
Additionally, under Section 13 (1) A person (A) discriminates against another (B)
if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or
would treat others.
And Section 15 provides me with extra protection against discrimination arising in
consequence of my disability.
And there is also a special rule for discrimination cases: if I can prove some of the facts, you will then have to prove there was no discrimination. This is sometimes called 'shifting the burden of proof'.
It is set out in section 136 of the Equality Act 2010:
Section 136 Burden of proof
(1) This section applies to any proceedings relating to a contravention of this Act.
(2) If there are facts from which the court could decide, in the absence of any other
explanation, that a person (A) contravened the provision concerned, the court must hold
that the contravention occurred.
(3) But subsection (2) does not apply if A shows that A did not contravene the provision.
The disability discrimination you perpetrated against me is covered by the Vento Scale
as outlined in the Equality and Human Rights Commission Guidance regarding the
value of discrimination claims. You can find it here:
The Commission indicates the lower band of £900 to £8,600 is for one off cases.
However, the lower band was revised to £900 - £9,000 for the financial year we are
now in. In considering the level of compensation that applies the Commission states
the following,
"While the court will assess the award of damages for injury to feelings in an objective
way, the perception and the individual reaction of the claimant will be an important
factor for the court to consider. The more upsetting the conduct is to the individual, the more seriously the discrimination is likely to be viewed by the court, and the higher the award for injury to feelings. Where a one-off act of discrimination is particularly humiliating or serious and the victim suffers serious consequences as a result, an award in the higher bands could be justified...".
And,
"Where the discrimination happens in a public place in front of a number of members
of the public, and so is more likely to be considered as humiliating...".
As well as being committed in public, the discrimination committed caused me
substantial distress.
I therefore seek £XXXX to settle this case along with specific information regarding
how you will ensure that no further incidents can occur.
I trust you will take this opportunity to remedy matters. You are reminded that under the Civil Procedure Rules you are required to engage in constructive communication to minimise any possible need for assistance from the
County Court.
I look forward to hearing from you with proposals for settlement within the next 14
days.
Yours faithfully,
19 Jan 2021 08:13:05
Katie Hopkins: Watch how the MSM set the stage to peddle their lies.
Katie Hopkins: The truth of what it is ACTUALLY like in DC
Read discussionKatie Hopkins: Watch how the MSM set the stage to peddle their lies.
Katie Hopkins: The truth of what it is ACTUALLY like in DC
18 Jan 2021 13:08:19
This is definitely worth a watch about the new world order
Read discussionThis is definitely worth a watch about the new world order
17 Jan 2021 18:24:59
British Scientists Developing World’s First Covid-19 Vaccine Smart Patch
Read discussionBritish Scientists Developing World’s First Covid-19 Vaccine Smart Patch
17 Jan 2021 18:16:25
Mark Steele - The 5G weapon evidence, a crime (Version 2) [uploaded 3 months ago]
Read discussionMark Steele - The 5G weapon evidence, a crime (Version 2) [uploaded 3 months ago]
17 Jan 2021 18:13:56
Example 2 [a law student] - as soon as a manager appears and hears the words 'I am exempt', unmask shopping is allowed in the Supermarket.
Read discussionExample 2 [a law student] - as soon as a manager appears and hears the words 'I am exempt', unmask shopping is allowed in the Supermarket.
17 Jan 2021 17:40:13
2 examples below showing that Supermarkets Head office have told only the managers that as soon as someone says 'I am mask exempt', that is the end of the conversation and you can shop without mask, but everyone under the manager is being told 'No mask no shop', what is wrong with Supermarkets?
Example 1 - as soon as a manager appears and hears the words 'I am exempt', unmask shopping is allowed in the Supermarket.
Read discussion2 examples below showing that Supermarkets Head office have told only the managers that as soon as someone says 'I am mask exempt', that is the end of the conversation and you can shop without mask, but everyone under the manager is being told 'No mask no shop', what is wrong with Supermarkets?
Example 1 - as soon as a manager appears and hears the words 'I am exempt', unmask shopping is allowed in the Supermarket.
17 Jan 2021 09:31:01
corona virus bill tabled in jan 2019 - over 1 year ago [video published may 2020].
Read discussioncorona virus bill tabled in jan 2019 - over 1 year ago [video published may 2020].
17 Jan 2021 09:30:58
Cannabis activists in Washington, D.C. are planning to offer a free bag of marijuana to those receiving the Covid-19 vax.
Read discussionCannabis activists in Washington, D.C. are planning to offer a free bag of marijuana to those receiving the Covid-19 vax.
