Latest replies

21 Dec 2014 06:27:48
Fan of the topic, not the actual Radiation lol. Should have been a tad more pacific

What a disgrace calling me a utd Fan, even worse than being called a Liverpool fan :P

Yeah I have been told you are easily pleased nowadays.

Ah sorry edd, steve I will tweet to tom sleman and see if he has any info.

I disagree steve on this subject sorely for the fact that ufos have been recorded for 100s if not thousands of years, I have no doubt the nazis were trying to build there own type of ufo but for me anything around that time was extra terrestrial.

Big fan of Fukushima? lol only a United fan can say that

.........deleted............

Exactly edd, this guy is calling everyone a shill.

just been out for a few pints here is the link to chris spivey who they are accusing of being shills as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgd2zGdPCKw#t=1451

Not too sure if it's a coincidence or not but the police have admitted that it is highly likely that a Westminster paedophile ring is responsible for at least one child's murder dating back to the 70's. They have appealed for more witnesses. Elm Guest House was also mentioned in the same article. I think the entire thing is going to be blown wide open in the coming months, then we will be able to work out who is on the level with their information.
I think I had a bit of a run in with the man you are both talking about, darkish haired lad? He was 'exposing' the male host of the UK Column with some pretty bizarre arguments and, basically, ramblings. I took him to task over him saying that all gay man were borderline paedophiles but his answers were just as crazy as his logic. I pointed out that paedophiles were both male and female, probably gay and straight. He wasn't having it though haha. Definitely a bit of a strange one him.

Right here is a link to the kent freedom movement who give a different take on ben fellows motives, for the record I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with anything but I have mentioned this kent freedom movement site a few times, I first got to know one of the fellers who had many interesting links etc and just mentioned the conspiracy site is also a great place to look into as I have learned heaps about different subjects, in fact I said to him to write a post on here as regulars would be interested.

then I got a load of abuse for being a shill and this site is a shill site, I was thinking wtf is this lads problem? anyways cut a long story short he never did write anything on here but I have been reading his links and members links and there seems to be a pattern, to call everyone a shill and they are not to be trusted, as he admitted to me his group HAVE been infiltrated by agencies, either the feller is paranoid or he is the one putting disinfo out, who knows?

i am just putting a alternative story about ben fellows and people can make there own mind up on this subject, for all I know he could be right I could be wrong.

Yeah by arresting him is only going to draw more heat to the subject as people now know who a Ben Fellows is and now MSM reporting this case is interesting. I agree KC is going to be untouchable add to the fact there is no real evidence but make no mistake they are panicking now with this csa inquiry it emerges david cameron said he is unconcerned about these reports and thinks we should move on, when the top guy says that it really means he is very concerned and a lot of people could be moving on, to the nearest court.

The police interview he recorded on his webcam was the first that I'd heard of him and his allegations Franky, a year or so ago. Watched quite a few things since then and I came to the same conclusions as you. If you were not guilty of such a crime then you would sue the other party as publicly as you could, if only so people knew there was no basis to the allegations. For me KC's silence speaks volumes. As you say, he can't remember what he did that day, well if you or I tried to use that as an alibi we would be charged quick smart. Thanks for the link, I'll watch and get back to you mate.

Ed033, you have hit the nail on the head as to why this man hasn't even been officially approached over this matter. The police in BF's own video practically confirm he is above the law. Crazy, nobody should be above the law of the land whether that be a factory worker, an unemployed person or a government official. I'm hoping that more comes of this case now he is in jail awaiting trial. The very fact that the police have been hounding him for silly charges shows me that something is amiss.

{Ed033's Note - The problem we all have to realise is that there's a level at which people are untouchable. Maybe Ben fellows didn't know that Ken Clarke was on the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg group, which places him above the untouchable level.

Here is a link from early 2014 it explains why Ben fellows has been so quiet and the end of this link is very interesting.

http://tinyurl.com/n7axnw7

{Ed033's Note - The following is a bigger picture look at things for those that might be interested.

Britain was in 1666 officially taken over by a corporation (with shareholders) which replaced any type of 'administration/government' we had.

When this corporation took over, they brought with them their version of a legal system and their version of a language called legalese and in 1666 while their agents were burning down the [rat infested/disease ridden] London to remove the people that were living there and give them a cleared location to do business (now called the City Of London) and a another cleared area they could create a new modern city in we call London, this corporation's agents in parliament declared everyone who was living here, dead and lost beyond the seas.

Now with no one living in here, their legal system could perform a salvage operation on this country and all the proceeds from this salvage operation could go to the shareholders of the corporation.

This salvage operation is still going on today. Everything the government and the legal system does is to benefit the shareholders of this corporation that took over.

All what we the people owned, all the natural resources and anything we the people pay for are supposed to be held in trust by a lawful 'administration/government' for we the people's benefit. If any natural resource was to be sold, then we the people (who were born here and therefore are the beneficiaries) should be given an equal share each of any profits.

But because this corporation's legal system/government doesn't recognise we the people, then the corporation's shareholders get the money.

Politicians and all public/civil servants/ employees (persons who work for the corporation/government) should be working for we the people but it's obvious they don't. Why not? Because they're working for the shareholders of this corporation, whether they know it or not.

The government creates legislation to serve the shareholders of the corporation not to benefit we the people.

What the FUQ entertaining documentary

By studying the plethora of recent examples, of government and press cooperation for falsifying/not divulging the accurate debt of countries one can find the answer to that question.

There is an example of an EU member which first reported a debt of 20 billion euros and minimal deficits, which became a debt of 250 billion euros in less than a year. Citizens didn't even make a fuss about it because they were told it was done so as to protect the price of local bonds and so as to not deter foreign investors.

Once the people comprehend that governments are using citizens as guarantee for increasing the government's line of credit, then they will realize that they are commodities in what appears to be the modern slave trade.
zari

Not 20 billion then, only 2.8 lol, well anyway according to the news, do you believe they're lying?

This is a strange case, remember watching him interviewed by police with the secret camera then later on with bill maloney, this is the time when all the saville stuff came out and the ken clark allegations came out and esther rantzen parties were kids were drunk and taking drugs, he was very detailed on what he was saying then he went of the scene for weeks, his g/f put out a appeal threw social media that he has gone missing and she was worried about his safety because they were getting phone call threats, then he turns up alive and well at the bilderberg rally in luton telling the people he was on the run, ask yourself this question, if you was a high profile mp and someone made allegations about you, would you not sue them and clear your name? ken clark can not remember what he was doing on that day, you make your mind up on who you believe.

Obviously by my avatar I am a big Che admirer, a vicious and complex man who murdered people at the end of the day and there is no way getting away from that fact, I do not agree with everything he believed in and everything he done but he stood up to the biggest terrorists on this planet and he lived and died by the sword, that is why we should always question history and who is public enemy number1, no doubt if Che was around he would be classed as another bin laden.

I'm a big fan of Fukishima. Shocking how we are not told about it.

Cheers for large response.

It is difficult to not believe what is being told by you by people who should be telling you the truth. Everything you, and others on this thread have said has made sense.

When you're asked a question, like what was the point, it does raise the question. The gov loss, the flag and speaking to tony abbot, the fact he didn't kill them all, does raise questions.