Ah just seen the clip where he updates us on the Skull, not to worry cheers lads
Read discussionLatest replies
No. no. no and no
the monarchy own the US, the us is just a registered company, as is the UK.
There is no democracy but with pc and buzzwords, people believe we are democratic.
Read discussionthe monarchy own the US, the us is just a registered company, as is the UK.
There is no democracy but with pc and buzzwords, people believe we are democratic.
There is another story about her spurning the advances of a Russian boss. Who then cheesed off ordered the hit. It seems any crime linked to anything that involved powerful Russians in any way gets completely scrubbed around. Litvinenko, Berozovski, stephen curtis (british accountant for berozovsky whos helicopter mysteriously crashed in bournemouth), British agent in bits in a locked suitcase etc
Supasub
Read discussionSupasub
Why did Proesmans suddenly distance himself from the result of the trial?
Ryan.
Read discussionRyan.
I only live a few miles away from where Dr Kelly was killed. this is a complete cover up.
Read discussionClearly Paul Hellyer is a very learned and decent man. At his age, he has nothing to lose by speaking his mind publicly. But his comment that 'there is no country on earth powerful enough to protect it's citizens from fanatical hate, as we learned from the Boston Marathon', suggests that be believes the official (Boston) story. He wants us believe in the possibility that there are four different species of aliens on earth, but roll over on Boston and accept the official story?
If you're going to make such a bold claim in such a public forum as that, then at least hang your hat on it. Don't mumble vaguely for nine minutes, so your critics can eat you alive or even worse just laugh at you. Even if he is right his delivery is so bad it makes him look like a silly old man. Sorry, he's sincere and likeable, but utterly unconvincing even to a sceptic like me. Ryan.
Read discussionIf you're going to make such a bold claim in such a public forum as that, then at least hang your hat on it. Don't mumble vaguely for nine minutes, so your critics can eat you alive or even worse just laugh at you. Even if he is right his delivery is so bad it makes him look like a silly old man. Sorry, he's sincere and likeable, but utterly unconvincing even to a sceptic like me. Ryan.
Hey fellas, first time poster to conspiracy talk. lots of fascinating stuff on here. this clip keeps crashing on me and when I look for vids on other sights they invariably have been removed or are otherwise unaccessible but before jumping to the "those in the know don't want you to know" conclusion, i'd like some links, if available, to other sites so I can process the info for myself.
Cheers. DB
Read discussionCheers. DB
If its true what he says, then we can assume that 50% of the aliens visiting earth are hostile (why else would they be in cahoots with the USA?) and the other 50% don't care about the rest of the planet, otherwise they would intervene to stop the USA marching us all towards a NWO.
Personally I think its disinfo, for what reason I don't know, maybe Bluebeam or something similar.
MrTrotskysGhost
Read discussionPersonally I think its disinfo, for what reason I don't know, maybe Bluebeam or something similar.
MrTrotskysGhost
Didn't enjoy the book in terms of entertainment, but as you said it raised some interesting points.
I found some of the facts interesting, and enjoyed the bit about geometric progression, but his numbers for current population and projected global population aren't consistent with official UN figures (not saying they're correct either, just that they don't match).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2013/jun/13/nigeria-larger-population-us-2050
The ending did, as you say have a bit of a twist. But I don't think it's too realistic. War would be a far more realistic occurrence to drastically reduce global population. Just my opinion though!
Read discussionI found some of the facts interesting, and enjoyed the bit about geometric progression, but his numbers for current population and projected global population aren't consistent with official UN figures (not saying they're correct either, just that they don't match).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2013/jun/13/nigeria-larger-population-us-2050
The ending did, as you say have a bit of a twist. But I don't think it's too realistic. War would be a far more realistic occurrence to drastically reduce global population. Just my opinion though!
Brilliant!
Peace
Jay
Glasgow
Read discussionPeace
Jay
Glasgow
Never been convinced Titor is real. Not sure my last post was real either since it disappeared lol :)
Ryan
Read discussionRyan
We all know that the Mccanns put their kids under certain sleep drugs that night so they could go out. But due to either heat or wrong dosage Maddie died and they got rid of the body.
Kopping a feel
Read discussionKopping a feel
Completely agree with you NI Gunner on all the points you made, except the Saurez one, he called Evra the and word at least 7 times which Suarez said was normal in his country and then in their next meeting refused to shake Evra's hand, anyway on the whole I agree with you. I hope my correction doen't OFFEND you!
Read discussionOr burying the truth
Read discussion18 Jul 2013 19:27:47
Wouldn't work in Newcastle :-)
Read discussionWouldn't work in Newcastle :-)
Agree with frankyscouser here regarding BB.
Only reason I watch is for psychoanalytical purposes. It's intriguing to watch how people in that show interact, from a psychological standpoint.
It is even more interesting how BB reprimands housemates, and manipulates situations. Honestly don't believe the voting is genuine and have never done it.
ConspiracyKen, you're right too. I think PC is mental. It's all centred around people getting offended. Hypothetically, I could get offended at absolutely anything.
An example of just how ridiculous it is. Here in NI there was a story in the paper about a man who was ordered by police to take his Christmas decorations down as his next door neighbour found them offensive. JOKE!
Hell, even look at the FA and Luis Suarez. Harshly treated for calling Evra a "little black man". How does THAT constitute racism? People seem to miss the fact racism is about oppression etc. Then compare that to what John Terry said, which was much worse. Less punishment. Xenophobic?
Speaking of xenophobia. In the celeb version of BB Heidi and Spencer were shunned because they were American. They were a bit obnoxious and what not but did stand on principle quite a bit, but anytime they were slated, it wasn't because the were "obnoxious" it was always "obnoxious Americans". What 's that got to do with it!
So many double standards and contradictions. I just say what I want to say, and couldn't care if someone gets 'offended' because this attitude of "this offends me" and "that offends me" like they're entitled to get offended as though it's a right. It's not, it's a choice. People are getting wrapped in cotton wool.
Read discussionOnly reason I watch is for psychoanalytical purposes. It's intriguing to watch how people in that show interact, from a psychological standpoint.
It is even more interesting how BB reprimands housemates, and manipulates situations. Honestly don't believe the voting is genuine and have never done it.
ConspiracyKen, you're right too. I think PC is mental. It's all centred around people getting offended. Hypothetically, I could get offended at absolutely anything.
An example of just how ridiculous it is. Here in NI there was a story in the paper about a man who was ordered by police to take his Christmas decorations down as his next door neighbour found them offensive. JOKE!
Hell, even look at the FA and Luis Suarez. Harshly treated for calling Evra a "little black man". How does THAT constitute racism? People seem to miss the fact racism is about oppression etc. Then compare that to what John Terry said, which was much worse. Less punishment. Xenophobic?
Speaking of xenophobia. In the celeb version of BB Heidi and Spencer were shunned because they were American. They were a bit obnoxious and what not but did stand on principle quite a bit, but anytime they were slated, it wasn't because the were "obnoxious" it was always "obnoxious Americans". What 's that got to do with it!
So many double standards and contradictions. I just say what I want to say, and couldn't care if someone gets 'offended' because this attitude of "this offends me" and "that offends me" like they're entitled to get offended as though it's a right. It's not, it's a choice. People are getting wrapped in cotton wool.
Yes its called sweeping it under the carpet
Read discussionCases are time locked to ensure all involved are dead when the case reopens.
How many corpses do you see in court?
Jimi 88
Read discussionHow many corpses do you see in court?
Jimi 88
If it is making them money they are going to roll with it, I assume you are talking about illegal drugs?but even legal drugs like alcohol suit there purpose, sell it cheap enough in supermarkets that in turn kills of the pubs which was a social meeting for everyone, ten years down the line pubs are dead, people do not mix as much because it is cheaper to drink at home and now they say we all drink way to much and it is bad for everyone, so they raise the prices.
Read discussionPolitical correctness has blurred the lines between freedom of speech and slander IMO. When I think of something I'm about to say, I never know if it's genuinely insulting, politically incorrect or whether I have the right to say what I feel. Poor example, but if anyone has been watching coronation street, you'll know that you can't say the slightest adverse phrase for fear of being called racist/ homophobic/ xenophobic etc.!
ConspiracyKen
Read discussionConspiracyKen