Latest replies

I agree with Franky and 10 is way too young!

Its not just about what is out there that they can access etc its about their understanding. How do you test a 10 year old has understood a sex education DVD. They would just giggle and most would not ask any questions.

It's too young ~ Mrs E

The Rothchilds are not the ones at the top, sounds out there but I seriously belief the ones at the top are not human. i'm talking Archons.

There is a belief that low down in the deep web, underneath all the disgusting and scary stuff, you have an Archon interface which is only accessible through impossibly high level clearance etc.

No doubt the Rothschild family are rich and powerful but I have always had a opinion that the most powerful figures are nameless.

Sorry Ed didn't mean to patronise. If you don't think Rothschild's are the most powerful, who do you think are really in power?

ConspiracyKen

Totally agree ed! The rothschilds are just a wealthy family! Don't get me wrong I do think they have some say in what happens! Maybe could be classed as an elite! But we all know that there are powers above with a lot more power and wealth than all the word put together!
RR!

I'm fine with 10 year olds learning about sex education but showing them two adults having sex is just wrong.

Sex education should be diagrams on a white board and an animated video.

You do get more mature kids developing than some other kids and there will always be the odd case of very young kids getting pregnant but guys I think you are missing my point, you mention kids having porn on a phone/internet easy to access which is my whole point, I will give you a example there has been a big crackdown on downloading torrents for movies and the chipped satellite boxes , the corporations were losing money big-time solution? they all got together and stopped it or made it very hard, now ask yourself could they do the same for anything pornographic? of course they could, there solution is to make it normal and that is there agenda and I am sorry that's what I genuinely think, let kids be kids because if this is going to be the norm god help kids in twenty years time.

btw I think the right age for sex education is when kids develop 12/13 average.

Migration is seeing many populous nations move elsewhere. This is nothing new. I fear China much less than I fear the UK govt. right now.

What age would you say is right then? Because kids are accessing horrible stuff far younger. There was a case in our local primary school when 2 lads were caught with porn on their phones- they were 7. Attempting to show them what's normal is important, even if it seems too young to you and I think it's slightly ludicrous to suggest there's an agenda to promote paedophilia in this. Attitudes to that have got far stricter over the years.

What is an appropriate age? Some kids are more mature than others.
I could have handled sex education at eight years old. At that age I already understood that other mammals did it. I have read about cases of young girls becoming pregnant as young as 11. If that's the case, then their sex education should have started at 9 or 10 to prevent it. Is that too young, Franky?


Jimi 88

Sex education fine at an appropriate age not ten years old and under and yes I agree kids can easily stumble on porn on the net, but showing nine and ten year olds two adults have full penetrative sex and the same thing with masturbation is way to young, and there motives I treat with suspicion.

I think you have got this wrong, Franky.
The sexualisation of our children is coming from the media and is not being dealt with by parents.
Look at the music industry, Beiber, in particular. There is someone, a near child himself, who has been marketed at 10-15yr old girls. Corporations selling sex to children is the only way you can describe that. Parents can choose to moniter their kids accessibility to such things but choose not to. If parents are not dealing with this properly and teaching their kids about this topic, the only place left to educate them in such matters is the schools. My brother-in-law is a primary school teacher and he says that the fellow teachers he has spoken to do not want to be teaching kids this stuff, it's a parents job.

The audio and visual bombardment of this generations children, from the media, celebrity and music industries, in particular, is where the blame should lie.

Jimi88

Unfortunately Kids are able to access sites at such an early age that the need to teach them what is reality is very important.
Back in the day it was blue movies on your brothers VHS tapes and maybe a dirty mag you found now its everywhere and much more graphic.

Kopping a feel

Don't get what you mean- sex is normal isn't it? Most theorists agree that teaching kids about sex early is the best way to avoid increased teenage pregnancies and STD's etc. Sex education in no way is encouraging paedophiles. If anything, it helps youngsters to grow up understanding what is acceptable and what isn't. They need to learn this stuff before they get access to pornsites on the net which will really warp their perspectives on sex.

Mate, china have ghost towns built all over china, there are a few reasons why they are doing this, one is they are the richest nation on earth but also know the debts that other countries owe them count for nothing if there other countries can't or won't pay them back so the wise thing is to build or buy all over the world, look at it on a smaller scale, you have a bit of money in a bank, do you you leave it in there doing nothing with the real possibility that it could get frozen or taxed or do you buy something that everybody needs like housing etc? I really do not think its a tactic to invade anyone, just they are in a strong position compared to most countries and because they are getting a good deal to boot.

You are right the bloodlines are the most important thing, every american president in history are related to each other including the opposition.

The i'm convinced that all the western leaders are related, even the most powerful working class are not innocent. Bloodlines are the key 2 all our conspiracy theories imo.

Food 4 thought, you know Cherie Blair?. well in her bloodline there is an interesting freemason, called John Wilks Booth. the guy who shot Abraham Lincoln. there are strange coincidences.

Yea definitely the people have been robbed blind and fooled on scale too big to comprehend monarchy realised long before anyone else it would be easier to pull strings from the background than worry about running country day to day it works even better now that they have the media to falsely reinforce the perception this is very much a multilayered society with a super elite we know virtually nothing about except they rob us blind and even that they have covered up fantastically, always remember watching clip from House of Lords where lord blackheath says a group was willing to wipe out uk debit but it want to talk to someone in uk of top 6 security clearance in the world, which in itself is an amazing statement. Top 6 in world and if there is a top six who where the group that had more money than them? We can only ever guess this lot have far too much power for us to ever scratch the surface their identity or intent

Could not agree more mate, it turns out the royal family descended from Dracula{Vlad the impaler}and Illuminati founder Weishaupt's sugar daddy (Duke Saxe-Gotha) its on dispatchers 8pm monday says tony gosling.

Yea I laughed other day when news was on they said about the increase in sovereign payment but when on to stress how frugal the queen was and how she looked after the finances, if she was that worried she could sell 1 piece a year of her vast jewellery or art collection most of that stuff is near priceless it's worth so much, royals have pulled master stroke of keeping power and money but people think they defunct, why does the priminister have to go there every week to update a so called powerless figure head? It's not like he has nothing else to do, always found it strange it's never commented on