A disagree from me here Franky.
i mostly click agree.
JK92
Latest replies
There is a video of the dogs in the apartment, and they went mad barking in two specific places. One was the cupboard in the bedroom, and the other behind the sofa. There is also some other stuff online showing how accurate the dogs are. Extraordinary animals. A neighbour of the McCanns said every time she passed by their place, the boot door of the hire car was open day & night. The McCanns apparently said that it was meat from the butchers that had spilt in the boot. They had cleaned it and were airing it. Hmmm. Ryan.
Read discussionI don't think Jay understands that people know Evolution IS REAL but it DIDN'T create mankind.
Even the church now accepts Evolution.
If it did create mankind then where is the missing link?
JK92
Read discussionEven the church now accepts Evolution.
If it did create mankind then where is the missing link?
JK92
Reply · 
frankyscouser · 30 Apr 2013 20:14
frankyscouser · 30 Apr 2013 20:14Jay I have to agree with the edd its just our opinions so do not take offence mate after all nearly everyone ticks my disagree box when I write something lol
Read discussionI'm sure I recall reading an article that the sniffer dogs went mental in the apartment and their hire car. Dogs don't lie!
Read discussionSM they don't care who they killed it was what they wanted to destroy & how they wanted to fortify there grip on mankind!
Rise & Shine
Read discussionRise & Shine
But ed, surely you seen he has great evidence, or at least knows of it, yet he won't share? a little preculiar that he talks about having/knowining of evidence, yet doesn't want asked about it! that's just not right, and i'm quite surprised at you jumping to his/her defence. You've been quick to do similar things on other posts too! probs best I just stay away from now on, cause seems likes everyones opinion has merit apart from mine, which is your perogitive. but I remember being one of the first people to visit this site daily and now it seems my views may not be as welcome as others. So with that, i'm thinking I may take a break from here because it seems like my views offend some!
Peace
Jay
Glasgow
Ps! (reply to the actual post)
well I disagree about the evidence! the greatest minds on the planet back up evolution to our being, people like the great richard dawkins, christopher hitchens, neil degrasse tyson, darwin etc. and i'm happy to agree with them than mental beliefs made up from nothing! {Ed001's Note - I am not offended mate, merely pointing out that there is no actual evidence, hence the huge search for a missing link. Without one, evolution just doesn't explain humanity. Like I said earlier, a lack of evidence to back up evolution is clear here, regardless of those people you list, who are quite capable of being wrong as well. Show me evidence of something to explain human origins, not just a list of random people who have a theory. I find that the greatest minds claim is often overblown, no matter how great your mind is, you can't possibly know everything, though that is my ambition in life!
I think you are being extremely disrespectful suggesting that not believing in evolution is mental and made up from nothing. It is quite the opposite, when the evidence suggest a great leap forward in cranial capacity, with no obvious reason or evolutionary chain for such a leap. Right now, the evidence suggests that we all evolve, but not that humans evolved from anything else, just that they appeared fully formed.
As things stand, evolution does not have the evidence to back up the theory, no more than any other theory. There is, on the other hand, plentiful evidence of ancient civilizations with advanced technology, including the capability to do brain surgery on what, we are told, were cavemen with stone implements. Evolution also suggest a slow improvement over millions of years, with changes happening over millenia, yet humanity is meant to have appeared, in evolutionary terms, the blink of an eye.
Until questions such as the missing link and why we evolved so fast can be answered adequately, rather than fudged over as they are currently, evolution can not be considered the absolute answer. I am very surprised you are so set in stone over this, surely you should have an open mind to all things, even those things that you don't like? After all, could the strange belief that ancient man has passed down to us, of gods, not be possibly explained by it being a more advanced race creating us in a genetic experiment? God/s don't actually have to be any more than beings with powers we couldn't explain, would modern day man, flying in planes and helicopters, not seem godlike in the way they are described in the Old Testament and ancient Indian texts etc?
Not that I am saying that is the answer either, I am just saying I am keeping an open mind until the day one theory can be proven conclusively.}
Read discussionPeace
Jay
Glasgow
Ps! (reply to the actual post)
well I disagree about the evidence! the greatest minds on the planet back up evolution to our being, people like the great richard dawkins, christopher hitchens, neil degrasse tyson, darwin etc. and i'm happy to agree with them than mental beliefs made up from nothing! {Ed001's Note - I am not offended mate, merely pointing out that there is no actual evidence, hence the huge search for a missing link. Without one, evolution just doesn't explain humanity. Like I said earlier, a lack of evidence to back up evolution is clear here, regardless of those people you list, who are quite capable of being wrong as well. Show me evidence of something to explain human origins, not just a list of random people who have a theory. I find that the greatest minds claim is often overblown, no matter how great your mind is, you can't possibly know everything, though that is my ambition in life!
I think you are being extremely disrespectful suggesting that not believing in evolution is mental and made up from nothing. It is quite the opposite, when the evidence suggest a great leap forward in cranial capacity, with no obvious reason or evolutionary chain for such a leap. Right now, the evidence suggests that we all evolve, but not that humans evolved from anything else, just that they appeared fully formed.
As things stand, evolution does not have the evidence to back up the theory, no more than any other theory. There is, on the other hand, plentiful evidence of ancient civilizations with advanced technology, including the capability to do brain surgery on what, we are told, were cavemen with stone implements. Evolution also suggest a slow improvement over millions of years, with changes happening over millenia, yet humanity is meant to have appeared, in evolutionary terms, the blink of an eye.
Until questions such as the missing link and why we evolved so fast can be answered adequately, rather than fudged over as they are currently, evolution can not be considered the absolute answer. I am very surprised you are so set in stone over this, surely you should have an open mind to all things, even those things that you don't like? After all, could the strange belief that ancient man has passed down to us, of gods, not be possibly explained by it being a more advanced race creating us in a genetic experiment? God/s don't actually have to be any more than beings with powers we couldn't explain, would modern day man, flying in planes and helicopters, not seem godlike in the way they are described in the Old Testament and ancient Indian texts etc?
Not that I am saying that is the answer either, I am just saying I am keeping an open mind until the day one theory can be proven conclusively.}
I am very much pro evolution, that's the reason we are here today! some people get confused thinking that we must have a purpose, nothing could be further from the truth! we'd be here with or without purpose as a result of evolution!
and Pea, ducking out of the difficult questions and ending the conversation? i'm quite surprised tbh. any other poster on here will at least refute what they say, not shy away! and why are you taking this so personally, these are only people opnions on here!
Peace
Jay
Glasgow {Ed001's Note - but you are asking for evidence, when you yourself can provide none of humans evolving to where we are. Where is the step before humankind? There is nothing, no evidence at all, of any kind of 'missing link' between ourselves and apes.}
Read discussionand Pea, ducking out of the difficult questions and ending the conversation? i'm quite surprised tbh. any other poster on here will at least refute what they say, not shy away! and why are you taking this so personally, these are only people opnions on here!
Peace
Jay
Glasgow {Ed001's Note - but you are asking for evidence, when you yourself can provide none of humans evolving to where we are. Where is the step before humankind? There is nothing, no evidence at all, of any kind of 'missing link' between ourselves and apes.}
30 Apr 2013 15:22:00
I have no interest in this conversation with you anymore. Thought i'd give you the courtesy of letting you know, that with all due respect, I just can't be bothered, mate. Been there, done that. pea
Read discussionI have no interest in this conversation with you anymore. Thought i'd give you the courtesy of letting you know, that with all due respect, I just can't be bothered, mate. Been there, done that. pea
I'm confused, I thought Jay was Pro Evolution? (as in it created us)
Read discussionA don't get it if 9/11 was faked why would america kill their own people that were in the towers
Read discussionBeen looking at the bodytalk of him on youtube and he looks edgy.
Read discussionReply · frankyscouser · 30 Apr 2013 13:47
frankyscouser · 30 Apr 2013 13:47I never knew that mate.
Read discussionGerry is not Madeleine's biological father by the way. We probably wouldn't have found that out if the police hadn't visited him in Birmingham to eliminate him as a suspect. Ryan.
Read discussionNothing really "created" us as such, but the human species is a result of evolution, the evidence is there for all to see!
Pea:
Where is this "overwhelming" evidence, and where does it come from? What does it say? Sounds a bit of a cop out not to mention any recognised scientist who are providing this evidence! And why the pop at atheists?
Peace
Jay
Glasgow
Read discussionPea:
Where is this "overwhelming" evidence, and where does it come from? What does it say? Sounds a bit of a cop out not to mention any recognised scientist who are providing this evidence! And why the pop at atheists?
Peace
Jay
Glasgow
Followed this a while ago, and my opinion is pretty much close to ed's. Something bad happend to Madeleine maybe by them or not, but seems they covered it up to save face. They came across to try too hard to make themselves shown in good light, but never fully shifted blame on their selves for not protecting their daughter. Did they ever say "its our fault" for not being there when she "disappeared"?that would be the first thing that would haunt me!
Read discussionYou just hit the nail on the head MrTrotskyGhost. Ryan.
Read discussionMartin Smith's statement left me thinking he might have seen Gerry that night. If it was Gerry, it doesn't look great for him. We'll probably never know for sure, but the McCann's attempt to discredit the sniffer dogs doesn't help either. Ryan. {Ed001's Note - as far as I am concerned, at the very least they were guilty of neglect, could you imagine the uproar if they had been a pair of chavs that left their kids alone while they went out? Because they are well to do, that doesn't make them any better at being parents, but it seems to let them get away with things that no poor person could.}
Read discussionMy opinion is we are here as either a punishment or for our own protection.
{Ed033's Note - Seems to be some sort of weird prison planet where the criminals run things.
Read discussion{Ed033's Note - Seems to be some sort of weird prison planet where the criminals run things.
What we have going on here, as part of a concerted effort to conceal from the human race both it's origins and present state of existence, is a total mind-job being done on the people. It's mission is to polarise people into two opposing camps, neither of which is entirely true.
On the one side we get Creationists and Bible Thumpers, and on the other we get the Crusading Athiests and Stormtroopers of Darwinism. Neither is truly rational, because they let their emotions guide them, and can be quick to mock those that don't agree with them.
Which brings us to the crux of the matter, the elusive 'truth in the middle' (being covered up by the. media) which is that we here on Earth live in Modified Evolution.
"Where is the evidence" they say, well, it's not in a textbook, it's not going to be in the news, there are no university degrees, no boffin will be wheeled out of some stagnant "educational" instituion to parade up and down the streets,
and yet, the evidence is truly overwhelming. It is a preponderance of circumstantial evidence, all pointing at the truth, we live in Modified Evolution.
pea
Read discussionOn the one side we get Creationists and Bible Thumpers, and on the other we get the Crusading Athiests and Stormtroopers of Darwinism. Neither is truly rational, because they let their emotions guide them, and can be quick to mock those that don't agree with them.
Which brings us to the crux of the matter, the elusive 'truth in the middle' (being covered up by the. media) which is that we here on Earth live in Modified Evolution.
"Where is the evidence" they say, well, it's not in a textbook, it's not going to be in the news, there are no university degrees, no boffin will be wheeled out of some stagnant "educational" instituion to parade up and down the streets,
and yet, the evidence is truly overwhelming. It is a preponderance of circumstantial evidence, all pointing at the truth, we live in Modified Evolution.
pea