Latest replies

Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 15:57
To the poster who said his facebook post was blocked .... the same rubbish happened to me yesterday and all i was putting up was monday evenings are just as boring as sunday mornings .. wtf who decided this was offencive or spammy as they put it !! when did this become a policy ?
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 13:54
This is laughable.... Arron is the same guy who moans on here about the goverment taking away our rights.... Then he starts moaning when rightly or wrongly a guy uses his human rights to protect him!! Astonishing Arron..... Oh and then he realises its not even the guy with the hook hes talking about.... It proves the Point some folks on here will post nonsense just for the sake of it.

Mr No Name
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 13:51
I knew you would get there in the end ed. Thankyou no name poster.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - sorry I just don't follow 'reality' TV.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 13:51
I was just asking the question ed, I've seen it a few times on news channels including the usual burning of a US flag. My point was if someone is to be potentially prosecuted for burning a symbol such as a poppy then the same should be applied at some of these rallies, that's all wether its correct or not.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - I just wish people would stop getting so hot under the collar about things like flags, they are meaningless.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 13:10
The UK consider him a threat to National security, yet he gets out on bail due to the 'Human Rights' that he hides behind. The same human rights he violates when carrying out his alleged terrorist acts. It makes my p*ss boil. He'll get police protection too. If I were the UK Gov, I'd be hinting to the Jorndanians exactly what his movements would be and suggest an extended toilet break for his Police guard.
Khakipillowslip
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 13:02
Ed he's talking about the conservative mp who has gone on i'm a celebrity get me out of here instead of looking after her constituents i think david cameron has suspended her without pay until she gets back so she won't be donating anything {Ed001's Note - ah right, got him now. He is right then, it is disgraceful, just like any MP doing another job at the same time as being a Member of Parliament. It should be illegal for them to do so, if they have time to consult or sit on a board, then clearly they are not doing their job as an MP.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 12:39
What about burning a flag ed? a union jack for instance?

Supasub {Ed001's Note - what about it? It is a Union Flag unless on a ship, by the way, but it is just a flag. I fail to see that it matters one way or the other, unless you are a sheeple that thinks patriotism is any more than a way of getting you to fight other people's wars, to make them richer and more powerful.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 12:39
Someone has chips on there mind lol
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 12:39
Ill try and upload the dvd for yous, 'doctors' are on it saying its the nxt best thing, if you get rushed into hospital they can just scan your arm and see your previous health problems and when medication ur on, it says they use them in mexico at airports and bus stations so anyone that is kidnapped that has one in them can be easily found. It sounds like they are already in use quite a bit, im amazed no one has ever heard about it myself included
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 10:59
It's great thank's to human right's lawyer's like Cherie Blair. What about my human right's regarding his human right's that infringe on my human right's of my human right's? And thus I think the law come's about like this as it's decided by Judge's who sit in places like House of Lord's and other law deciding establishment's that want grey area's and confusion as they make alot of money from it.

Supasub
Read discussion
Reply · · 13 Nov 2012 10:39
Upload the dvd to YouTube then post a link

{Ed033's Note - Yes, I have heard of it. Katherine Albrecht speaks on this subject. The plan would be something similar to these steps:
1. All special forces would have to consent to being chipped otherwise they can't be special forces
2. Everyone in the forces (army, airforce, navy) to consent to being chipped otherwise they are discharged.
3. People entering prison consent to be chipped to lower their sentence slightly
4. All police officers to consent to being chipped otherwise they are sacked
5. All government employees consent to being chipped otherwise they are sacked
6. No one can enter a government building without a chip
7. All new born babies to be chipped as standard unless both parents before or immediately after birth sign to say they refuse to have their baby chipped
8. All schools require the children attending the school to be chipped. Their parents consent to this or must homeschool their children instead
9. People cannot get a passport, drivers license, government benefits/state pension without consenting to being chipped
10. Being extremely difficult to operate in society without being chipped virtually anybody else not chipped will consent to it

Everyone chipped by their own consent or by their parents consent. Overtime the chip becomes more complex so people can be controlled by the chip (Lando Calrissian controlling the guy with the head device in Starwars - Empire Strikes Back)
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 22:54
Talking of freedom of speech I was watching I'm a celeb earlier (for those that didn't see- two 'celebs' where buried alive whilst bugs poured in through holes) I tried to post a joke about it on a social network site, the joke being..conservative MP in a box full of maggots is this a dress rehearsal for thatchers funeral and I got this response 'this post contains blocked content that has previously been flagged abusive or spammy' so posting about thatchers funeral is blocked content? I understand my joke may not be to everyones taste but i found the response strange {Ed003's Note - It's the same reply I got from my local council over a grievance last year,must be a common reply}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 21:14
Freedom of speech should mean freedom of speech regardless of persons or trouble causes ,i think some of you are missing the bigger picture, a site like this or a social network site in the future were we question mps police, banks whoever they can arrest you,they are trying to moderate the internet as it is now they want to censor what we say, smell the coffee guys this is much bigger than persons burning poppies or homophobic tweets its a lot bigger.
frankyscouse
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 21:07
Sorry it wasn't hooky it's qatarda. My mistake

Aaron
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 20:01
99% of Muslims in this country are British. So obviously they have the same rights as any other British citizen. There protests seem to be for the British government to stop attacking/causing wars in Muslim countries. There does not seem to be anything wrong with that all they are after is peace. I will give you an example if the British were to go to war with Homer Simpson I am certain the whole of Springfield will have something to say about the British! I apologise for an immature example but I did not want to offend anyone by using real people/country.

Love&peace2theworld
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 20:01
The ones like Hamza and Qatada weren't born here and are/ were happy to rake in fortunes in benefits, and those 2 were calling for detah to all non muslims.

I've no problem with people protesting but there's a right way and wrong way and very often they choose the wrong way.

I'm not pro war by any means but i have a lot of mates in the forces and it is distasteful in the extreme when bodies are coming back and the hate mobs are on stirred up by fantatic preachers who should have been deported long ago, instead of hiidng behind the laws of a country they clearly despise. {Ed001's Note - I agree, but putting a stop to it isn't the way to deal with it. All that does is stir up even more ill feeling.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 17:39
Imo ed if they want to do their protesting it should be done in their own country, it causes to much trouble between the two.

JK92 {Ed001's Note - sorry but they have every right to protest here and how do you know they aren't British anyway?}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Nov 2012 17:30
Jk92 it is distasteful for anyone protesting about soldiers forced to go to afganistan then coming home in a parade or a coffin ,to me the protesters let them selves down and should protest at the real culprits the government , we should be careful what we want if people are happy with police charging anyone that might cause offense but they can not charge well known pedo rings of the rich and famous then the sh$t will deffo hit the fan.
frankyscouse
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.