03 Nov 2016 10:02:41 unfortunately this will get no media time on main stream or alternate, its almost like everyone who has airtime is trying to make us so skeptical that we believe nothing not even each other, which is kind of enforcing divide and rule.
31 Oct 2016 17:11:47 Edd033 they're taking the complete p*ss and laughing at the American people meanwhile the majority of msm talks about irrelevant Trump garbage. Hilary's girlfriend gets immunity for being a criminal.
30 Oct 2016 17:05:35 Yeah Saudi who executes people by beheading and stoning. Outrageous.
I've been the first to say Russia's recent record on human rights hasn't been spectacular but for Arab countries to even say anything is outrageous hypocrisy.
30 Oct 2016 14:20:11 listened to George Galloway on talk radio who mentioned that and they have kicked the Russians out as well, if you made a film about this you would think its far fetched.
26 Oct 2016 19:32:52 Ed001 I think the majority can see that neither are the perfect choice. I respect your opinion but I think a lot differently than you on Trump.
Trump has vocalised his discontent at the corrupt mainstream media. I believe if he becomes President he will make moves against the corrupt establishment. However its likely his life will be the risk then you have Mike Pence who will be just another puppet.
26 Oct 2016 17:18:08 Edd001 he's vocally been against globalism. If I was an American I'd be voting trump. I believe he will help the American economy and provide a lot more jobs. I don't know how you can parallel him with hilary Clinton. Especially concerning her connections with Saudi Arabia. Trumps no Saint but he would make some sort of difference. Hilary wants and will force ww3 with Russia. Trumps a better potential president.
26 Oct 2016 15:38:44 Sad edd033. The hate towards the man and the sheer ignorance towards hilarys corruption will make America crumble. It's astonishing that something new comes out about Clinton each day and no one, hilary supporters don't want to hear or don't care as long as trump doesn't become president. People's mindsets are astonishing. He said some outrageous comments about women but you have another candidate who's much much worse and should be in jail . I actually believe trump could stop and dismantle a lot of corruption especially corporations and the nwo but the zombies want hilary.
26 Oct 2016 15:57:16 Animal testing is not used in carbon dating, and the small percentage of clinics you refer to that have different security considerations are not relevant here. Labs that perform carbon dating are easily found, and some labs will even carbon date an item for a fee even for the general public. Not everything is shrouded in secrecy as you would like to make it seem. You don't need to be actively in the academic community to have access to such publications. They are usually subscription based, and easy to access.
If a so called 'John Smith' really did carbon date this aluminium at 250,00 years old, let's see the report, and what journal it is in and when was it published. I look forward to reading his credentials, his report, and most of all how he feels about his credibility being on the line if he really did make that claim.
I already acknowledged to Ed033 that even if it was just a couple of thousand years old it raises questions about who would have been capable of making it.
This type of claim must be subjected to rigorous scientific examination by credible scientists in controlled conditions in an attempt to replicate it's findings. I strongly suspect this will never happen. It makes for a good tabloid headline, nothing more.
26 Oct 2016 13:32:47 Ridiculously naive? You do know that laboratories carrying out certain work are not named because for example they might carry out research that uses animals and would attract protests or more violent action from animal rights protesters. That's just one example. The same as certain clinics in America are not named for security reasons.
Unless you are actively in the academic community and receive such publications and other material you won't find out which lab tested what and that it was carried out by Dr John Smith.
I actually agreed with your general point regarding the artefact in question. The age is questionable. Although I do agree with the editor. If it is not a recently produced item incorrectly dated then it raises fundamental questions.
26 Oct 2016 11:59:08 Its a harsh thing to say but i'm so glad I don't live in the US! they don't seem to want to give power and look after their people, they look like they just want power and want to extort their populace for said power.
26 Oct 2016 11:55:47 That's right Ed001 you have no idea. None of us do.
The 'appropriate publication' you referred to was just a guess, as was KP's ridiculously naive claim that laboratories are rarely publicly named.
Until we have the name of the lab, and the name of the research team who conducted the carbon dating, and the published findings, this claim has no merit.
MrJonesy · 03 Nov 2016 09:06
