Great find edd, I never heard of that base before, I have heard of human mutilations connected with alien abductions before and I think it would shock everyone how many times this happened, there is a rough estimate that 1 million children a year go missing now and in the uk and the usa there are 10 million reported cases alone were people are not found, now I am not saying all these cases are ufo related but let's just say 1% of those incidents are related to ufo activity, that's 100000 people just from the uk and usa, that's a full house at wembley, I have tried to search for a while to get a rough idea how many people worldwide that go missing and its near impossible it will be just rough estimates in fact there was a Campaign to unlock secrets of people who go missing in the uk around 2012 because the bureau reveals lack of research, it seems every country has no official data on people for a better word just vanish of the face of the planet, in my opinion I think this information is getting suppressed to not alarm us all, on a side note edd do you think the rays/beams that are supposed to take down these ufos are from a different species?
There is a thread on David Icke's site all about whether Jackie shot JFJK, there is a guy called Rodin on there who has done some extensive work on the theory. I would highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in the subject although some of it is a bit too technical/scientific for me:
I love the theory that JFK and Marilyn Monroe were killed because JFK was thinking about telling the world about the existence of ET's and shared this with Marilyn which got them both killed. Intriguing I think. Can't remember where I heard it.
Yes, I think that theory first came ot in the 1970s, but I don't think he fired a bullet from his weapon, what is interesting to me is the shooting of jfk at the kill point was filmed from 3 different angles, zapruder, and right across the other side of the street 2 men in dark suits are filming too, you can see them in the zapruder film, I think they are cia/navy intellience, this footage has never been seen, also it was filmed from behind in the motorcade, there's footage of this on some youtube videos of the motorcade driving though the city centre a bit before they come to elm street. lfc
Even early in the day of 9/11 there would have been hundreds of tourists walking around with camcorders (very popular until about five years ago) in NY, and yet the only footage we have of the so called first plane was that now famous video taken by the Naudet brothers. We have no other evidence to corroborate their video. Nobody saw the plane. Only the explosion. Unless you include the actors who were interviewed, who evidently saw it all in detail.
Just like all the video cameras at the Pentagon failed at the only moment in history they needed to work. But luckily the ahem plane hit the one part of the Pentagon that was under redevelopment, but happened to have lots of files about the missing 2.3 trillion dollars Rumsfeld spoke about the day before 9/11. And the poor people who lost their lives in the Pentagon were accountants and budget analysts. So it was no longer possible to find any hard data after 9/11 on how that 2.3 trillion disappeared.
So it had to have been 19 muslim terrorists from the middle east who all died on 9/11 who did this, but oddly 11 of them are alive and well today? All orchestrated by their boss Osama from a cave in Afghanistan, in collusion with Saddam who clearly had WMD's or as we call them, Oil for Euros. And David Kelly clearly topped himself by slashing his wrists with a penknife and yet there was no blood, just like United 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania but there was no plane.
Well that all makes perfect sense. How dare we question the official 'story'.
Jackie killed jfk-the hidden hand, a closer look, youtube. see cia agent jackie bouvier murder jfk- youtube. having looked at every story from bush, james files, the mafia etc, etc, it really is there in plain sight, jfk was shot from within the car, you can see the smoke from the gun discharge and the actions of john connally and jackie, we all know the film has been messed about with, but there's still enough there to really tell what happened, I have always wondered why would anyone alter the film, if it was shots from other buildings etc, would it not just be took for granted that there was more than one shooter, no the big reason for the cover up and set up of lee harvey oswall was jackie and connally killed jfk right there in the car,. lfc
Shanksville is pathetic. We're supposed to believe that flight 93 hit the ground so fast it just got swallowed up. Here's a video that shows the scar was there long before 9/11. I agree there was no plane at the Pentagon either Franky. But at least the had a building to hide that fact. Shanksville was just a hole in the ground with no aircraft debris. I'm genuinely baffled that most people still believe the official story.
I find the pentagon crash more interesting than the other 9/11 events, one if not the most protected buildings on earth and no protection and not one conclusive picture/video of a plane hitting it.
The much overlooked tower 6. As for the so called impact site in Shanksville, I remember seeing a b&w photo from the sixties of that very field. There was a very wide narrow slit in the field and on 9/11 they used this as evidence of the wing impact.
A very thorough and well researched piece. As good as anything I have seen on Sandy Hook.
The most revealing piece of information here for me was that 35 properties in Sandy Hook changed hands on December 25th 2009 and the sale price for each was zero. All in and around the Lanza property on Yogananda Street. Can't wait to hear the explanation for that.
An alternative theory based on some of what the presenters describe:
The Nazis kept a secret base in the Falklands where they performed experiments. From what we know from operation paperclip they where experimenting with electricity, magnetics and high-frequency phenomena among other things. The holy grail of electromagnetics is achieving room temperature superconductance.
For the sake of the argument let us assume that the oily substance described, is a stable superconductive liquid. From most of what is attributed to the "oil" and the description of its various effects it could very well be just that. Such a liquid would exhibit varying viscosity levels according to the electromagnetic activity in its environment, would most certainly interfere with electronic devices and even brain activity.
The brain uses electromagnetism to perform its functions so any device emitting such waves has an effect on the brain, irrelevantly if we are conscious of it or not, by way of interference. For example cellphone signals, wireless internet signals, tv and radio signals etc. can cause restlessness, stress and even tumors. A superconductive substance would have far stranger effects on the human brain as that is the area where spacetime limitations are practically non-existent, something akin to quantum state. Taking into account that the building block of life, as we know it, is carbon 12 (6 electrons, 6 neutrons, 6 protons) a superconductive form of carbon, say carbon 7 (6 electrons, 1 neutron, 6 protons), could perhaps even initiate a chain reaction and cause the human brain to loose neutrons so as to achieve resonant frequency with the substance.
That could explain the bizarre deaths of the scientists as such an event would definitely alter their perception and would potentially drive a limited mind mad with the lack of structure and relative infiniteness of higher dimensions. One of the presenters mentioned of encountering this liquid in transceivers. If properly utilized in such a configuration it would act as a superb amplifier. Such a substance would also have use in advanced quantum computers which again could be what the main presenter was referring to.
frankyscouser · 19 Mar 2014 07:45