Ed033’s profile

31 Dec 2018 21:58:58
Well there we go! One of us is talking BS in regards to fracking. If you want my certs I can send you them. But like you say you believe whatever resonates with you. Funny enough he reminds me of someone I worked with ten years ago and he was a wire liner with sclumberger. But that was a long time ago. I do appreciate what you put on here and this is most certainly not a dig at what you do or what you believe. Just thought I’d chip in.

The world is a mine field and I believe no one has a bloody clue what goes on. Just wanted to put out there what I see in this fracking nonsense. Thought it might help. But I don’t know what you think of ANTIFA but can tell you I’ve seen dozens at both fracking protests and ANTIFA protests. Just saying.

31 Dec 2018 20:34:55
Ok well my main point is that I don’t have the knowledge and expertise to comment on the other things he talks about. So would have to blindly follow. As for a top oil and gas executive how do you know that. Have you seen his certs. Now as I do have a very good knowledge on the subject I can safely say that even if the other things he speaks about are correct (although I would not have a clue) the shale gas thing is absolutely nonsense, in the sense that it is a lot less damaging than conventional drilling if you like.

Of course there can be mistakes and things that go wrong as there can be in any job. For example plane crashes, car crashes etc. Are people up in arms saying that plane or car travel should be banned because they are ruthless killers? So if you compare the OTT coverage of fracking that I believe was set off by the sun newspaper or some other awful tabloid to the Gulf of Mexico that ended up been a blockbuster film after the absolute devastation it caused to the area then you have to put it into perspective!

So after watching a few of the guys videos and knowing that what he speaks of is utter nonsense then it would be fair to reason that the other subjects he speaks of are also flawed. By the reasoning on this very page and presuming that he is in fact some top oil and gas executive (although I believe it’s a lie or an exaggeration) could he be a planted dis info agent that is trying to divert attention away from the more damaging conventional drilling (which I do! Not shale) that covers 95% of the drilling world in far more delicate eco systems than what are been tracked in the uk.

It’s 100% hype and I’m honestly trying my best to give a good insight into a situation that is probably more propaganda than you would believe (unless I’m a half awake moron that doesn’t post you tube videos) I do believe this guy is charging for his videos on fracking, now if he was on the moral high ground and it was his passion to wake people up he wouldn’t be charging daft money for his stuff. Screams hypocrite and phoney all day long to me. Just my take ED ✌️.

31 Dec 2018 09:03:41
🤔. Anyway regardless of fossil fuels. The point I’m making is that if he was such a high flier in oil and gas I don’t know why he has said the things he has and is targeting shale gas in particular. If he is what you say he is then he would surely be putting more efforts into traditional methods of extraction. The main point I am making is the protesters themselves, they are horrible human beings that are attacking and stopping workers going home to their family’s after what is a long enough day as it is and a fairly dangerous job where you need the time off between shifts to safely perform their duties. Surely you can’t be advocating this can you? They are also wasting lots of tax payers money on another note.

30 Dec 2018 21:25:41
Ed I work in the industry it’s not believing the mainstream it’s something I see and do every day. I would suggest that the whole fracking nonsense originally came from a tabloid newspaper . I could write an essay debunking the whole thing. I would suggest that the whole thing could be a different agenda making people look away from more conventional techs that people don’t appear to have any problem with that are far worse and more destructive. I know this for a fact Ed I’m not lying to you.

The whole anti fracking movement are been played like puppets. I’ve seen this first hand and also seen the same faces at these movements that are also affiliated and seen amongst ANTIFA . I can’t comment on the other stuff he talks about and I’m not trying to feather my nest. I’m telling you as real 100% first hand knowledge that it’s utter rubbish.

On another note these idiots that are protesting at sites are nutcases I have had experience with this and these people are obstructing humans and stoping people getting home to there families after what should be a 12 hour shift is turning into 16-18 hour days . They are physically detains people and been offensive and provocative to people and damaging people’s personal stuff. This is totalitarian and fascist by there own logic.

They believe that there opinion is absolute. I’m not for a second defending oil and gas cartel I believe that fossil fuels are only needed for about 10%. I am currently working on geothermal and that should be the future but the same idiots are protesting these rigs as well. It’s shocking what these morons are doing and the fact is “conventional “ drilling is far worse as they are using oil based muds and synthetic muds that also fracture (frack) the formations when lack off occur. Fracking is just high pressure water mate. Fact. I’m just giving you the heads up so you don’t get conned by this MSM agenda. Surely your not buying this.

Also research what he did about CBL (cement bond living) And nuclear sources . They are typical for MWD (measure whilst drilling) CBL is run on wireline using resonance for determining the validity of cement jobs. He is simply making it up. A person with no experience in the field piecing stuff up to make himself sound like some sort of expert. Those nuclear barriers would have been for the MWD. I’m not lying just letting you know that he is very very wrong. And to be fair fracking jobs are absolute peanuts in the world of oil and gas. Don’t believe the hype mate.

30 Dec 2018 14:16:16
Oh he’s one of those anti fracking nut jobs who actually don’t know anything about fracking. Dis info at its best there. God forbid they look into conventional oil and gas drilling 😀 I’ve had the misfortune of bumping into a fair few of these highly confused lefty students (just looked on his YouTube channel) dear oh dear.

16 Dec 2018 09:16:53
Excellent interviews that are somewhat undermined by the clumsy segue into James Ussher and all that creationist nonsense about the earth being 30,000 years old or thereabouts. It really does Alex no favors.

11 Dec 2018 07:43:35
Anyone interested in JFK should watch this. Thanks for sharing Ed033.

23 Aug 2018 00:06:25
Jamie off our page starred in it Steph lol.

22 Aug 2018 13:50:07
I read about that. People not allowed back to rebuild due to contamination etc. I'll keep looking at this. If it is the beginning of enforced migration to so called safe urban areas, then we should see more and more of this happening.

22 Aug 2018 13:10:34
There is possible evidence of DEWs in California. I'm on a steep learning curve here, so I'm reluctant to say it's definitely DEWs, but the patterns of the fires seem tailored. Also the trees burning from the inside out is something I have never seen before. If they are using DEWs then why here, and why not in combat scenarios. Is it because they need HAARP, and that's not so easy to export?

21 Aug 2018 12:51:08
I've been checking out lots of stuff about The California fires and DEW's, and there's plenty to think about, but Jamie Lee is a fully committed flat earther which makes me just a little sceptical about the rest of his work. He also claims the Athens fires were started by DEW's.

18 Aug 2018 03:04:10
Reminded me of the film, Wolf of Wall Street.

16 Aug 2018 12:06:54
No regulatory oversight as long as the money keeps coming in. Really interesting and cautionary tale. Didn't realise until the end it was made by the same crew who did Blackfish.

06 Aug 2018 18:52:39
This is essential viewing for anyone who wishes to understand what really happened on 9/11.

04 Aug 2018 00:28:39
I 100% believe that cookers and such survive fire lol.

03 Aug 2018 13:02:59
Perhaps an event such as the fire allows them to test it in plain sight without anyone noticing. Maybe it is to demonstrate just how specific they can be on a smaller scale with pin point accuracy. Now translate that to a real war scenario and the possibilities are endless. I wonder what distance they can operate from the target, and was the fire the energy source for the DEW?

03 Aug 2018 11:47:52
How can you incinerate a house to dust and the tree next to it is untouched?

This reminds me of 9/ 11. One side of a car incinerated, and the other side was completely intact.

Direct energy weapon as hypothesised by Dr. Judy Wood perhaps?

23 Jul 2018 08:44:48
well worth watching.

10 Jul 2018 16:44:11
If you use the book of Genesis that a place called Eden existed then you also have to use Genesis as evidence of the flood. And the biblical account states that the water covered all of the mountains. This should also include Eden.

10 Jul 2018 16:05:48
I think the Younger Dryas hypothesis can cover much of the Bible stories personally. If you want to know more, then you can find quite a few 3 hour podcasts with Randall Carlson, Robert Schoch, Graham Hancock and a few others, which go into great detail on the theory.

He's been on the Joe Rogan Experience about 6 or 7 times, I believe this was his second solo appearance on there: