Heskeyfenwa’s profile

Gbi hence my point, we all do not agree on certain subjects on this site but we have a inkling something is not right.

The report last year. I was young when hillsborough happened and didn't even know of the hatred towards the sun newspaper regarding there portrayal of the fans that got caught up in the tragedy. Only in the last year, since the report I have seen how big a cover up it was, and made me re-asses my views on certain events and how our media go about reporting it I mean If they can try and sweep something as horrible and tragic as that disaster under the rug, what else are they capable of.

GBI

{Ed033's Note - The main stream media are capable of misrepresenting everything except sport scores.

Which report?the taylor report or the report last year?well to be honest it doesn't really matter as the vile comments made by the establishment and media a couple of days after hillsborough, my point is not just me but nearly everyone from liverpool knew it was a coverup and it has took a report that has took nearly a quarter of a century for people like you to believe, like I mentioned I question most things, I think its our duty to scrutinize what we are being told.

I was never really interested in hillsborough. Then I read about it in the paper. Then the report came out. That's about it. My beliefs differ from yours on certain theories on this sight, in sorry for that. I may be of the 'brainwashed' kind from the media and so on, but I'm cool with that. Would rather get my info from these sources than from that money grabber David icke or a man that was made to look like a complete and utter person by some1 as vile aspiers Morgan, Alex jones being that 'man'

GBI {Ed001's Note - money grabbers? You mean totally unlike the big corporations feeding you 'truth' such as Sky or ITV? Because they are definitely not out to make money are they? Or are you going to suggest the BBC, that well known bastion of truth, so long as by truth you mean government propaganda or else they lose their license?}

GBI you say after the first Boston blast and before the second, the net was awash with theories, and you cannot believe this (and how repugnant it is) Yah I can't believe it too as they where seconds apart. Am I mistaken or did you really have some sort of reasoning here?

Out of interest when did you realize hillsborough was a coverup?

I've seen a programme where all the conspiracy theories are put to test, it has the guy from the loose change group. Every theory is put to bed. Stuff like that is enough for me, but any1 who wants to see a different event will eventually see what they want to see. As I said b4 to u franky my mind is as open as it can be espicially since the hillsborough cover up. The Boston bombers are there to be seen along with the aftermath.

GBI

{Ed033's Note - "Every theory is put to bed." That is nonsense.

Gbi you remind me of a twitter follower who wants bona fide evidence wrapped up with the words the real truth, let's be straight none of us know what the real truth is but we do a bit of research from various outlets, then we look at the pros and cons of any event and what impact it makes in the future and finally we make a educated guess and give are opinion, no doubt you would have questioned the bay of tonkin incident when it happened as not being true which is your prerogative but some of us on this site like to keep a open mind.

I'm sorry. where is there any spread of evidence or suggestion the knew the bombings would happen?! Yes, the FBI interviewed/were meant to interview one of the suspects years ago, but how on earth does that automatically mean the government knew the bombings were meant to happen?

J. G

I think this could possibly be the case, that's my take on 9/11 also.

GBI

{Ed033's Note - You obviously haven't heard about Judy Wood PHd or her book, Where did the towers go. Unless the alleged 9/11 hijackers had control of black technology that can turn building including the steel to dust, then the alleged 9/11 hijackers did not cause what happened to happen

The show mixes various theories together to come up with the truth they want to present. I love the shows but it can let itself down on simple mistakes. On many occasions they show artworks with what they call 'UFO's'. These artworks are usually of a religious nature and are merely showing the moon and the sun, left and right on the artwork. The debunked show mentioned above is at the other extreme and uses similar techniques to 'prove' its theory. As a believer in advanced alien species I like how Ancient Aliens at least addresses the point that civilization may have at various times been far more advanced than we think. There is a new documentary coming out soon that will be worth a look. The trailer is available to view here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htAh0g6RO4w

Some people maintain Steven Greer (who is behind the documentary) is part of the disinformation lobby, but the points raised in the trailer would seem to dispute this, to me. I've been lucky enough to have flown over the Nazca lines, which often feature in Ancient Aliens, and nobody can convince me that they are not meant to be viewed from above.

Captain Needa

You wanna check out ancient aliens debunked. CM68

The underwater towns is very good and some parts of the cowboys is too.