frankyscouser’s profile

frankyscouser

Replies to these posts

Reply · Not Registered · 15 Jun 2014 12:42
15 Jun 2014 13:31:56
Ah but that is the question, what happened to 4 plane loads of people if the planes were not destroyed in the way we are lead to believe?

Kim Philby
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 14 Jun 2014 19:01
If we agree it was not a plane, then were are the people that were alleged to have crashed in the towers?we have seen plenty of stories of victims in the towers but its awfully quiet on 9/11 plane victims.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 15:53
That's an interesting thought Franky. I wonder if any families have sued the airline or whoever they could sue for damages?

Ryan.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 15:47
Have to say i'm leaning that way to. its implausable

(last no name was mine to)

gerrymcgin1888
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 15:36
Redact my last statement, its pretty good footage but my original point stands. not one other person has this footage? i'm pretty clued up on this and agree with the structural engineers pilots etc that its boll##ks but why has there not been more footage. this should have been completely blown wide open by now?

gerrymcgin1888
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 15:13
'Even saying that a plane really could melt into the building'

Who is saying that Ed001?

Ryan.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 14 Jun 2014 15:13
Just watched the updated thoughts, interesting one thing we never seem to hear about is the alleged plane victims family members, that interests me more than what actually hit the wtc.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 15:13
Right that's cool franky but really not a single one of those millions of people have an original photo or video? I fully beleive in suggestion (ed) and black tech but that's surely not possible? the law of averages alone would say so.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 13:25
{Ed033's Note - The above Richard D. Hall video presentation is not the latest conclusion that Richard D. Hall has come to. The below 2 video presentations are the latest conclusions on video that Richard D. Hall has come to, which is different from the above

http://richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=178&part=1
http://richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=178&part=2
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 14 Jun 2014 13:13
Gerry check this out ans see what you think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4VQs57m4So
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 12:56
I believe the idea of a missile cloaked by a 'plane' hologram is highly plausible Ed033.

The speed according to NIST is 510kts, which is consistent with a missile such as a tomahawk.

The 'aircraft' that hit WTC2 appears to have a missile or similar shaped object under it's fuselage.

The 'aircraft' is dark grey and doesn't look at all like a commercial airliner, and does not reflect the sun.

Ryan.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 11:26
No one has footage of an airliner hitting the Pentagon, but we're supposed to believe that?

And no one has footage of an airliner crashing in Shanksville, or even debris on site, and we're supposed to believe that?

The only footage I have ever seen of WTC1 being hit was from the Naudet brothers, and the 'aircraft' seemed to disappear into the building like in a Disney cartoon.

Ryan.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 10:46
Yes Franky all those thousands of tourists walking around Manhattan with camcorders and not one of them picked up even a few shaky seconds of footage? The fact that the Naudet brothers footage is the only image we have is highly suspicious.

But Al Suqami's fireproof passport was found near the WTC so that's that right?

Ryan.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 14 Jun 2014 10:46
Surely then franky by that rational, in a city of 10 million netoriously easy to piss off new yoikers. there would be masses of photos/videos showing a missile/unknown object hitting the towers? it seems odd that as you say there is so little footage either way? I woulda thought in new york of all places that many people would be hard to contol? I fully believe 9/11 to be ropey at best. just seems odd that rather than disecting the plane footage, no one seems to have video evidence of anything else hitting the towers? your thoughts?

gerrymcgin1888
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 12 Jun 2014 19:14
Cheers will bookmark it and see if anything interesting turns up.

http://www.forteantimes.com/
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 12 Jun 2014 13:59
You know what edd the bizarre news I tend to believe more because no one tends to believe it.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 12 Jun 2014 12:29
Stanley Kubrick definitely had some inside knowledge. There was a very interesting video link posted by ed033 some time ago on that matter.
zari
Read discussion
Reply · Geordiesteve · 12 Jun 2014 12:28
Minority reports also had targeted advertising, as Cruise's character walks through the concourse.
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.