Southern Monkey’s profile

02 Mar 2020 07:19:09
I only explained a few days ago that mainstream science had to make up dark energy and dark matter to make the theory of gravity work. There is absolutely no proof in either other than the fact that if they are not there gravity is wrong.

Name any other theory where so much has been made up, for it to work?

Maybe do some research in to incoherent magnetism [gravity].

01 Mar 2020 18:37:17
Thing is hsf, you can buy a microscope for next to nothing and look at the 'microbial life' yourself.

Not so easy getting into 'space'.

01 Mar 2020 01:14:08
Charlie Chaplin speech from the above video

29 Feb 2020 22:08:33
*some subtext from videos I post.

Whatever the slant of whatever video, it aggravates me that people feel the need to mock the other side. It just takes weight out of the debate. You believe what you believe. Too be shamed for that in any shape or form is subhuman.

I have never said I was right. I will be happily proven wrong.

Prove me wrong on the videos I post. I encourage it.

29 Feb 2020 21:46:20
Yeah, I put Anon out of respect of the origin of the point of view.

If they want to respond. Kudos.

29 Feb 2020 18:48:59
only a short clip so watch the whole thing.

At 2m8s was the part I was referencing earlier.

Astronauts on wires:

29 Feb 2020 18:00:13
Don't worry, Ed. They're in a nice warm studio.

Rian, I am not sure if they were posted on here, but there are videos showing Astronauts floating back to there feet after falling over. (Basically them struggling with the wire harness, or it was the harness operators first day. ) .

You have to remember though, that these are the best of the best and they don't need to concentrate or care about what they are doing. Much like the lunar launch on Apollo 15 when all they are worried about is playing some music on a tape player, to celebrate how great the US is. It's not like if one minuscule thing goes wrong, they are all dead hundreds of thousands of miles from Earth.

28 Feb 2020 18:50:48
Was strange to find this as the first post, as I watched a different video on old maps, this morning. This lead me to Urbano Monte's map of 1587. Its width is 10 feet. It's in Italian but can be translated.

Urbano Monte map

"Monte made his map to serve not only as a geographical tool but also to show climate, customs, length of day, distances within regions - in other words, to create a universal scientific planisphere. "

The question with the OP video is, why make a map with Islands and towns if they are not actually there?

Do you happen to know the context of this map, as in why it was made and who commissioned it? .

From thinking across topics like chronology changes, hidden past etc. It does seem to point to some big changes in the I600s. And isn't this the time that the printing press became a thing? . I'll have to check but sure the first printed book was the 'Gutenberg Bible'. Thought that is probably debatable.

28 Feb 2020 07:20:12
Standard. I can only speak for myself but it's not a case of believing that the Earth is flat. (And I don't believe anyone on this site has said space doesn't 'exist'. It just doesn't in the form of mainstream perception. )

It is more a case of NASA faking space and the fact there is no photos of the Earth that haven't been run through the 'Blue Marble' framework (basically photoshopping) where they layer 2d images across a globe model.

NASA even sent a 'satellite' into 'space' just to take photos of the Earth. Yet on closer examination, they are still using the 'Blue Marble' 3d model to run the images through. Now why is that? Why not just take a picture and show us the raw image. Why are they altering the image? for what purpose?

NASA also faked the Moon missions. If you care to take the time on these pages you will find the NASA footage they didn't want you to see.

The question of the flat Earth becomes a possibility because of these things.

Then to add weight you have the Antarctic Treaty. You can not go beyond 60 degrees south latitude without permission from higher powers. And then It would be impossible to explore because of the limitations.

The say it is 'pure' down there. But I have seen uninhabited island/ lands strewn with crap from the western world. How does this not get to Antarctica? . I assume all climatic airflow also circumvent this part of our world, as there is no pollution down there?

Basically things just don't add up. I have just posted a video on the 'dogma' of science as we know it. How they make us believe things are fact when it true reality they are no better than unproven theories with no one bit of proof to back it up.

Gravity is something that is also brought up with the flat Earth model. But gravity has a serious flaw. And to cover up this flaw mainstream science has created 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' to patch the glaring holes in this flaw. That's 96% of our supposed Universe. So they have a theory that is 96% incorrect.

Things like this go unnoticed when people just believe what they are told. If you want a serious career in the sciences, you dare not question the dogmatic truth.

I could go on, but I feel my words fall on deaf ears.

26 Feb 2020 19:42:26
Just to add to this thread.

The 'experts' tell us space in Sunlight is 250C and in darkness is -140C to -170C.

If you had a standard kitchen oven big enough to fit a car in and set to max temp, circa 250C, what do think would happen? .

If you had a freezer that could hit -140C or below and put a car in it, what do you think would happen.

If you put a car in a box that went from -140C to 250C in an instant, what do you think would happen?

Now think of the fakery of Tesla's 'Starman'. Earth glitches at 3:20 and 3m36 onward you see the flat earth satellite projection spread across the 3D globe model.

and you have to love a bit of Bowie (RIP)

26 Feb 2020 19:48:14
People, as in you the reader of this post, SPACE AS WE KNOW IT IS FAKE.

26 Feb 2020 19:24:05
I love watching through old archive footage, Ed. Back then, 'they' didn't have to worry about whether people believed 'them' or not.

Difficult to imagine a time, nowadays, where most had to go to the cinema to watch the 'Pathe News'.

A time where, 'We', the 'public' were just in awe of the 'moving pictures', 'flicks'. And things like, 'We', 'the public's trust' of those in power', were taken advantage of far more easily.

Hang on, is that no different from today? Just that we have a far more technological 'elite', with a greater budget?