Southern Monkey’s profile

03 Jan 2020 14:05:12
This may, or may not interest you Ed.

CIA document on advanced weaponry

Thanks for the work.

31 Dec 2019 14:02:27
Just searched for an explanation for this effect and its comical.

"The researches discovered that acoustic waves, also known as sound waves, in the earths upper atmosphere pile up along the the leading and trailing edges of the moons shadow as it moves across the earth, like the waves when a ship plows through water"

"First the wave capture, this is simply caused by vibration of the air around the moon, caused by the effective hit of a solar bow wave, pressure wave which the moon and indeed even the earth to a certain extent also will have this mini flutter occur. "

So now shadows have mass? and there is air on the moon?

31 Dec 2019 14:11:18
They would probably think it was a good idea and be stupid enough to try. Has there been any recent updates on what HAARP is up to?

My yt searches just bring up the opposite of what I'm trying to find these days. Is there anyway of searching yt without using their search algorithms? a back door so to speak.

31 Dec 2019 12:19:10
The vacuum argument has me perplexed, Ed. The main stream answer would be gravity does it. Yet this doesn't make sense as gravity is weak and the force of which is easily counteracted by ourselves by the mere act of picking something up. If the same said object was the seal of a vacuum that was fixed point. The force used to break the vacuum would be exponentially greater than, that of gravity. So, by that very thought experiment, the system is flawed. And as you suggest, the atmosphere would be instantly ripped away.

I have seen the light show that is what we know as stars. And yeah its puzzling, but I have always put this down to atmospheric conditions being turbulent. That's the narrative we are taught anyway. Having looked at the moon a lot, you see whatever this effect is, very clearly. Almost like watching something through crystal clear waters. Having dabbled in the world of parachuting/ paragliding I have been trained to think of air acting the same way as water. So this effect of the moon and stars has up until now, always made sense.

31 Dec 2019 10:12:50
So, hypothetically speaking. If the flat earth dome system existed. Pretty much everything we have been told is fake.
Is everything outside the dome real? or a projection onto said dome? .
Gravity or the effect of the force we know as gravity, would become very complex to explain with what would become defunct main stream science.

I have spent a very, very long time outside in the cold, looking at, and collecting digital camera data from such named objects as M51, horsehead nebulae etc etc. I'm going to be pretty pissed if it turns out I was taking an image, of an image. haha :)

31 Dec 2019 09:50:03
What do all the "experts" say about the pollodium 218, Ed? . Tried searching for anyone in the mainstream talking or addressing this and no one seems to. I guess I should not be surprised by the empty rhetoric.

30 Dec 2019 17:21:38
Cheers, Ed. Knew you'd have a, albeit mind-bending, plausible explanation up your sleeve.

30 Dec 2019 11:39:54
If you were anywhere on a flat earth, and its was sunny. Would it not be sunny everywhere on that flat earth?

27 Dec 2019 16:31:50
Great footage, Ed. Thanks. I think I just heard hsf's head explode ;)

27 Dec 2019 13:54:33
If you were there, the sight would be incredibly overwhelming and yes, you would expect there to be some more references to the amazement of seeing what would probably appear like a super earth. Even so much as speechless moments. But there isn't, that I am aware of.

The only footage I can recall offhand where you can see the earthrise from lunar orbit was some VT on what were these lunar flashes that 2 astronauts describe. On more than one occasion they saw flashes coming from the same lunar location. The footage doesn't show what they see, just voices and lunar landscape which then shows an earthrise. All would be easy to fake if you had the resources.

You could make a case for only a few "apollo" photos of the moon because the cameras were fixed POV apart from one? I believe, which was manual. And what with limited time, they were trained just to get their job done. But to counter argue. They had time to play golf and test Newtons theory of falling objects, but not to film the earth?

The big question is, why have we never been back?

27 Dec 2019 07:44:11
I agree with that. The problem is you would need to be standing on the moon to see that, from that point of view (your own eyes) .

I was trying to get the point that, for instance, If I look at the moon with my yes and think i'll take a nice picture of that, then use a cameraphone let's say, to take a pic. Then moon appears a lot smaller than what i expected it too, when I looked at it using my eyes.

Hope you follow me, Ed?

You statement question is valid, but you would need to compare photos using exactly the same equipment. Or we can start a crowd funding page to get you too the moon? :)

I will see if I can find out the Apollo camera specs and take a picture of moon using same specs then we can compare.

Just a quick follow up. As far as I can tell it was taken by the 70mm Hasselblad.

lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS11-44-6552.

Sadly I have left my camera charger at home and won't be back until the new year. So can not take a 70mm comparable pic just yet. Not that I expect to see the moon anytime soon with this weather we're getting, anyhow.

For the time being here is a photo of the moon someone that is not me has taken at 70mm. It shows the point I am trying to make quite well.

26 Dec 2019 22:31:09
For the moon to be that big in a photo you would have to use a telephoto lens zoomed into a distant horizon. Do you know what lens was used, Ed? . I would think it was probably a lot smaller lens. If you used the apollo equipment to take a photo of the moon it would look at lot smaller than the earth in the above image.

But this is by no way me saying that the photo isn't fake.

26 Dec 2019 10:42:51
Never really delved to these depths of the rabbit hole without the pre-programmed mindset shutting down any unbiased thoughts, before.
Very compelling, Ed. Thanks for sharing.

26 Dec 2019 10:35:29
I am trying to fight the algorithms, Rian. No luck yet. Hoping its on an old hard drive in a friends attic. Watch this space.

I did stumble across yourstrawman.com which has a lot of info on this subject for those that don't know.

Wishing the Ed's and everyone else, all the best for the new year! Thanks for all the research.

15 Dec 2019 00:42:48
There was some old YT videos of a Canadian women/ legal case, where she bought her house using her birth certificate (bond) . She documented it over several months. Using notices to keep people from entering the property etc. She eventually got the house. Lawfully. Can't find anything about it any more.

08 Dec 2019 20:27:15
Yeah, true. But it is too simple to understand that its flawed with the evidence that is currently presented. I think its just too many people just don't care to be honest, Ed. I have spoken to quite a few people about this and after 5 minutes they get on with there self obsessed lives.

"I know this steak doesn't exist. But when I put it in my mouth the matrix will tell me its juicy and delicious. After nine years. You know what I realise. Ignorance is bliss"

Hence the poll I asked for.

08 Dec 2019 07:49:49
OK I understand now.
I was generalising about all things in that middle statement. I should have put. How has it taking me this long to realise this when I have actively sort out truth for several decades. There seems to be relatively little information about this glaring hole in the theory of evolution. But yet it only takes a simple paragraph to get someone to seriously question it.
I'm asking this more rhetorically just so you get an idea where my minds at. Thanks.