22 Aug 2017 10:07:05
Yes ed33 exactly.
southampton87’s profile
southampton87
Published posts and replies
22 Aug 2017 01:10:26
As always enjoy
The conversation hsf, ed and others.
A bee apparently can't fly as a bee defies gravity
There is one law in our world
Either You know Or you don't know!
It's all about resonance
Inside a bee there is a cavity that is hollow
When he beats his wings it resonates
What In turn helps it defy (gravity)
What mainstream science tells you this
Before you try to work things out.
We live in a mad world run and controlled by even more mad persons.
22 Aug 2017 01:28:11
Why does the sun gravity that is stronger than ours
Not steal our sun?
Read discussionWhy does the sun gravity that is stronger than ours
Not steal our sun?
21 Aug 2017 23:21:28
hsf, I know what the text book says mate, but it don't add up.
And when I take a step back NASA is fake same as the Russian Japanese and Chinese space agencies
What model / theory are you working from i. e.
The sun is shooting through the galaxy and the planets following
Or the sun and the planets shooting through space in order
Because common sense tells us we can't do both
And what are you working this out by?
Because as far as I can see gravity is unproven best guess maybe, but solid without doubt proven no chance!
So by saying anything past this point is pointless.
To me the image looks like Stanley Kubrick working his magic from the grave
No matter what rip Stanley
But can I prove it no.
The fact the sun comes from one angle can give you the position of our planet and sun
But beside the fact .
If I drum up fake evidence I'm going to look at how science explains the workings.
Then put that working into the fake evidence
So that if a clever hsf popped up it would make sense .
But let's take it back to something like gravity
Without it your whole concept falls apart
But is it proven, No.
So from there your whole theory and what you have learned from space is bull and you couldn't argue the difference.
Because where you come from is false to begin with.
Have you seen the experiment with a extra long slinky
When held from a balcony
You would expect with the pull of gravity the hole thing when released would drop
Does it, no.
The bottom does not move while the top does. If gravity was in effect this would not happen. So as I said, I don't doubt your knowledge in space but I do doubt the theories you work by.
To come to a conclusion.
And what I asked was why do we not see the (dark side) of the moon.
Passing In front of our earth instead of cgi
As a computer generated image is not a real picture.
And thank you for letting me know what light pollution is.
21 Aug 2017 23:52:24
Well killed any fun to be had there aye hsf
Lol
Yes ed33
It would be good to see.
Read discussionWell killed any fun to be had there aye hsf
Lol
Yes ed33
It would be good to see.
21 Aug 2017 23:23:43
Sorry for not replying sooner
Yes that is what my opinion would be on these two.
ASwell ed
Thanks for replys.
Read discussionSorry for not replying sooner
Yes that is what my opinion would be on these two.
ASwell ed
Thanks for replys.
21 Aug 2017 14:47:19
Hsf
So how is the side pictured got light on it
Surely the sun would have to be behind no?
And as you just put it's not the side facing earth.
Because where is the earth.
21 Aug 2017 15:07:38
Rogan sells out regularly.
He sold out for fame and to avoid being forced off youtube through censorship.
If u want an indication of what people believe, look how many people tuned into watch Eddie Bravo on the Rogan show two weeks ago compared to this show.
Apart from that these specialists tell you things we know nothing about. Ie they talk about the time the first comet hit it caused an ice age. Well this is apparently what happens when the sun gets blocked by the dirt and dust getting kicked up into the atmosphere.
Then they go on to say and about 1600 years later another comet hit to cause a massive rise in temperature. How about after the dust settles, the sun being able to peer back in, it would naturally start to melt the ice and in turn create clouds witch would then rain and then flood.
But a bigger question gets left unanswered. We are covered in water where did it come from? Because these same specialists try to say water was first brought to the planet by a comet. But these specialists also try to say the water has resided as well, meaning there was a lot more at one point. It's all best guesses.
We cannot get honest clear pictures of the deepest of our oceans or the deepest parts of space or even real full pictures of the earth or the moon that passes in front of our Earth. They can give false evidence all day though.
Humanity in the past most probably where massively advanced. We today just like to think we are. So I do hope there is hidden tech because at least we could then be seen to be advancing in space and seas as we like to believe we can.
Read discussionRogan sells out regularly.
He sold out for fame and to avoid being forced off youtube through censorship.
If u want an indication of what people believe, look how many people tuned into watch Eddie Bravo on the Rogan show two weeks ago compared to this show.
Apart from that these specialists tell you things we know nothing about. Ie they talk about the time the first comet hit it caused an ice age. Well this is apparently what happens when the sun gets blocked by the dirt and dust getting kicked up into the atmosphere.
Then they go on to say and about 1600 years later another comet hit to cause a massive rise in temperature. How about after the dust settles, the sun being able to peer back in, it would naturally start to melt the ice and in turn create clouds witch would then rain and then flood.
But a bigger question gets left unanswered. We are covered in water where did it come from? Because these same specialists try to say water was first brought to the planet by a comet. But these specialists also try to say the water has resided as well, meaning there was a lot more at one point. It's all best guesses.
We cannot get honest clear pictures of the deepest of our oceans or the deepest parts of space or even real full pictures of the earth or the moon that passes in front of our Earth. They can give false evidence all day though.
Humanity in the past most probably where massively advanced. We today just like to think we are. So I do hope there is hidden tech because at least we could then be seen to be advancing in space and seas as we like to believe we can.
20 Aug 2017 17:52:21
Also what do people think of the Lunar wave and the other videos that claim to show a star through it.
20 Aug 2017 17:50:58
What do people think about the far side of the moon
Ie every space agency refuses to show it
Like a Japanese and Russian clips of the moon passing in front of earth .
I know it's clearly cgi with the moon just blotted out.
But why we not able to be shown or see this.
20 Aug 2017 15:11:02
Oh yes them beautiful sleepless nights
Lol only joking
Congratulations.
Read discussionOh yes them beautiful sleepless nights
Lol only joking
Congratulations.
19 Aug 2017 23:11:54
That would be my opinion too ed33.
Read discussionThat would be my opinion too ed33.
19 Aug 2017 23:20:08
Lol
That would make sense hsf.
Read discussionLol
That would make sense hsf.
19 Aug 2017 22:28:06
CTR i was agreeing with ya mate about curve.
But if u think the planet is just twice the size, you would have to go twice as high.
Same with 3 or 4 times
And 40,000 feet isn't that high you would probably need to be at least 90.000-130.000 feet up to start seeing curve or flatness .
August piccard back in 1930 or something when't up to around 90.000 I may be wrong .
I knew Boylan was the one u was speaking of and his view is quite interesting.
But there has been a load of miss info and what not put up about it now.
HSF it was Stephen hawkings website u visit was it mate lol jokes.
Read discussionCTR i was agreeing with ya mate about curve.
But if u think the planet is just twice the size, you would have to go twice as high.
Same with 3 or 4 times
And 40,000 feet isn't that high you would probably need to be at least 90.000-130.000 feet up to start seeing curve or flatness .
August piccard back in 1930 or something when't up to around 90.000 I may be wrong .
I knew Boylan was the one u was speaking of and his view is quite interesting.
But there has been a load of miss info and what not put up about it now.
HSF it was Stephen hawkings website u visit was it mate lol jokes.
19 Aug 2017 18:23:32
Matthew Boylan was the nasa painter that first got my attention he was employed to drum up the actual image we see and know as the planets quite funny dude to watch as well in my opinion.
Then a few years later Eric dubay caught my attention.
He has a different way of giving what he calls his evidence.
Read discussionMatthew Boylan was the nasa painter that first got my attention he was employed to drum up the actual image we see and know as the planets quite funny dude to watch as well in my opinion.
Then a few years later Eric dubay caught my attention.
He has a different way of giving what he calls his evidence.
19 Aug 2017 13:41:25
Yes I think the old theory of (dark bodies) in and around the sun and moon could be more sense. Then there is the theory the moon was placed into orbit.
Being that the moon is too big to be a satellite for our planet unless it is hollow.
CTR, curve of the planet is that wrong like you said NDT had to even change the shape of the planet. and 8 inch to every mile squared is unprovable.
people have proven this to be a lie on youtube with high power lasers.
There is a physicist on youtube that agrees with everything listed. He even talks about how the ISS couldn't be where they say it is With there own math. Then he even talks on planes flying with the spin against the spin and across the spin.
And the problems that the arises from trying to land at these angles and speed.
I agree fully they cannot keep giving math and cgi for proof. And I do know the man that used to paint the images. blond hair man cannot find his video or name?
Strange because he was one of the first about 3-4 years ago I listened to him.
Read discussionYes I think the old theory of (dark bodies) in and around the sun and moon could be more sense. Then there is the theory the moon was placed into orbit.
Being that the moon is too big to be a satellite for our planet unless it is hollow.
CTR, curve of the planet is that wrong like you said NDT had to even change the shape of the planet. and 8 inch to every mile squared is unprovable.
people have proven this to be a lie on youtube with high power lasers.
There is a physicist on youtube that agrees with everything listed. He even talks about how the ISS couldn't be where they say it is With there own math. Then he even talks on planes flying with the spin against the spin and across the spin.
And the problems that the arises from trying to land at these angles and speed.
I agree fully they cannot keep giving math and cgi for proof. And I do know the man that used to paint the images. blond hair man cannot find his video or name?
Strange because he was one of the first about 3-4 years ago I listened to him.
19 Aug 2017 13:45:05
Hsf,
Not taking the piss in anyway. Respect for the knowledge in what you talk of.
But how much of what you say, do you know from proving and doing yourself.
Like when you say Proxima Centauri is so far, and how much is from the text book?
Read discussionHsf,
Not taking the piss in anyway. Respect for the knowledge in what you talk of.
But how much of what you say, do you know from proving and doing yourself.
Like when you say Proxima Centauri is so far, and how much is from the text book?
18 Aug 2017 15:11:51
Nasa themselves tell u in the little print on there website
That there cgi
Look at the billionaires in there on private space expedition attempts space x elon musk, virgin galactic Branson.
Don't seem to be going anywhere
Not heard about Bob Bigelow and his Aerospace venture.
And the navy I mean nasa lol and other government connected agencies are the only ones that can do it.!
There's is a reason for this money and propaganda in my opinion.
I don't doubt they can fire things into space but I don't believe they control anything from earth.
Pre programmed at best even then to do this on earth we have to map the planet to do so.
How would u pre program some you don't know about.
And a lot does say they advance tech or it's lies.
Read discussionNasa themselves tell u in the little print on there website
That there cgi
Look at the billionaires in there on private space expedition attempts space x elon musk, virgin galactic Branson.
Don't seem to be going anywhere
Not heard about Bob Bigelow and his Aerospace venture.
And the navy I mean nasa lol and other government connected agencies are the only ones that can do it.!
There's is a reason for this money and propaganda in my opinion.
I don't doubt they can fire things into space but I don't believe they control anything from earth.
Pre programmed at best even then to do this on earth we have to map the planet to do so.
How would u pre program some you don't know about.
And a lot does say they advance tech or it's lies.
18 Aug 2017 15:14:04
Nasa in Hebrew
Means deceive.
Read discussionNasa in Hebrew
Means deceive.
18 Aug 2017 15:00:02
Yes and Coriolanus effect
Can affect a bullet but not a plane, even through a plane thrust it's self like a bullet
But travels a lot slower over a greater distance.
good posts
And interesting reads people.
Read discussionYes and Coriolanus effect
Can affect a bullet but not a plane, even through a plane thrust it's self like a bullet
But travels a lot slower over a greater distance.
good posts
And interesting reads people.