17 Aug 2017 23:38:32
Yes exactly.
I have heard a theory that where the ice has melted (if it has) .
They believe they have found pyramids under the ice proving to some sort of advanced civilisation was about long before the ice cap was there.
also there is the inner earth theory that you ed have pointed to also being a theory which would be more of an explanation as to why the secrecy for the amount of time it has been in place.
southampton87’s profile
southampton87
Published posts and replies
17 Aug 2017 23:41:05
Not alone in your thinking, CTR.
Read discussionNot alone in your thinking, CTR.
17 Aug 2017 22:10:36
Yes I agree with both.
But that is exactly how I look at it and where problem does exist.
the concept runs into a lot of criticism, but when u get past the obvious problems like is there an edge, or if we are not a globe what with the magnetics of it how would this be possible.
But I still cannot find anywhere where they have proven curvature in all mass bodies of water that points to the earth size. considering were 72% water to land apparently .
And why have there been so many attempts to prove the earth is moving and fail.
And the ones they say have been questionable and could easily be manipulated through math as they do.
Also why is no one allowed to go to Antarctica without special permission
And companys in controlled areas.
But do I think the earth is flat, no.
But what if admiral Byrd was right and when he flew over the Antarctic there really was a continent the size of America and a government there to.
And as you say when u look it proves a lot more they talk of is psychological more than the actual reality.
But also as ed says it does also have the opposite
Where if there is real next level tech out there then
The science we're judging things on are bound to be wrong.
Read discussionYes I agree with both.
But that is exactly how I look at it and where problem does exist.
the concept runs into a lot of criticism, but when u get past the obvious problems like is there an edge, or if we are not a globe what with the magnetics of it how would this be possible.
But I still cannot find anywhere where they have proven curvature in all mass bodies of water that points to the earth size. considering were 72% water to land apparently .
And why have there been so many attempts to prove the earth is moving and fail.
And the ones they say have been questionable and could easily be manipulated through math as they do.
Also why is no one allowed to go to Antarctica without special permission
And companys in controlled areas.
But do I think the earth is flat, no.
But what if admiral Byrd was right and when he flew over the Antarctic there really was a continent the size of America and a government there to.
And as you say when u look it proves a lot more they talk of is psychological more than the actual reality.
But also as ed says it does also have the opposite
Where if there is real next level tech out there then
The science we're judging things on are bound to be wrong.
16 Aug 2017 21:31:12
Yes hsf I too believe most ufos seen are human built,
Dr Greer has some good info on it.
Only thing I think is a bit of are the meet ups he talks of and photos of (extra dimensional beings)
But u never know .
And I get the heads up cheers
Lol.
Read discussionYes hsf I too believe most ufos seen are human built,
Dr Greer has some good info on it.
Only thing I think is a bit of are the meet ups he talks of and photos of (extra dimensional beings)
But u never know .
And I get the heads up cheers
Lol.
15 Aug 2017 22:54:00
One good bit of footage that hasn't been proven fake or tampered hsf.
Is a ufo hovers in Jerusalem flashes then takes off.
nothing they build at the minuet with the tech they admit to having, is possible to do that.
Literally takes off in a flash.
Read discussionOne good bit of footage that hasn't been proven fake or tampered hsf.
Is a ufo hovers in Jerusalem flashes then takes off.
nothing they build at the minuet with the tech they admit to having, is possible to do that.
Literally takes off in a flash.
15 Aug 2017 23:01:32
Also I will add
Two weeks ago I saw three lights in a triangle.
Not the hole thing if it was anything at all just lights through the cloud traveling north west had not a whimper of sound.
Where there was so many clouds I only see it for two seconds then thick cloud blocked it from view.
I wasn't even going to mention it where I see it so briefly and as you do it makes you question whether you see anything.
But thinking about it I deffently see something slip through the clouds to big to be a commercial drone.
Read discussionAlso I will add
Two weeks ago I saw three lights in a triangle.
Not the hole thing if it was anything at all just lights through the cloud traveling north west had not a whimper of sound.
Where there was so many clouds I only see it for two seconds then thick cloud blocked it from view.
I wasn't even going to mention it where I see it so briefly and as you do it makes you question whether you see anything.
But thinking about it I deffently see something slip through the clouds to big to be a commercial drone.
15 Aug 2017 22:47:00
Good vid ed .
Read discussionGood vid ed .
14 Aug 2017 15:05:26
Look for the Dark side of the moon lol.
The face once caught my eye when they came out but then I watched a doc with more images and apparently it's shade cast as it moves kind of ruined it.
I also see the lines mention and that too looked interesting .
They also claim to have a picture they claim is similar to the Grand Canyon.
Apart from that they have it first before releasing.
And they apparently employ people to air brush things out they don't want people to see.
Read discussionLook for the Dark side of the moon lol.
The face once caught my eye when they came out but then I watched a doc with more images and apparently it's shade cast as it moves kind of ruined it.
I also see the lines mention and that too looked interesting .
They also claim to have a picture they claim is similar to the Grand Canyon.
Apart from that they have it first before releasing.
And they apparently employ people to air brush things out they don't want people to see.
13 Aug 2017 13:24:37
Foot not miles sorry.
Edge of our atmosphere 330,000 ft
Late night last night lol.
Read discussionFoot not miles sorry.
Edge of our atmosphere 330,000 ft
Late night last night lol.
13 Aug 2017 13:25:09
Good morning / afternoon.
Read discussionGood morning / afternoon.
13 Aug 2017 12:11:02
They didn't mind showing people killed in 9/11
And they don't mind showing people bombed in war .
It's all part of vampirism get people low to feed of the worry.
To me honestly if I train for a space mission and this is a dream come true.
I already know I could float off in space no chance of rescue.
Drones round the other side of the world is done by apparently bouncing frequencies of the ionosphere .
And how do you know they are not doing the controlling from and "outpost"as u put it with nibiru.
Even if you double the distance require to travel the circumference of the world .
It's not even a inch on the travel needed for mars.
And mars is not in a fix postition not that I'm saying u couldn't work out a math or formula to work out where it would be.
Just that doing the two things are massively far apart.
Look at the continent of Africa double and triple on nasa cgi.
I'm not saying space travel is fake or impossible.
I'm saying with what the science tells us of space the tech they use does not travel it.
And to believe in space travel u must be to some degree believe conspiracy.
Becuase in my view space travel can not be done with the tech they talk of.
And I heard u talk of a star that is in the red spectrum.
Does this include the in far red to
Becuase red and in far red are two different things.
Even when we talk of proof the earth our planet! Moves
The mickelson and Morley experiment failed .
They say the fualcort pendulum proves movement too but this is proven to change direction of travel.
I'm not saying we don't move or anything.
Or we don't travel space.
Just that most of what is said as fact and truth is in fact a theory.
And I agree most are the best theory to stand up to date but they are still a theory and a best guess.
When it comes to telescopes
There are what I call real telescopes that u directly look though and see an image with your eyes.
But real deep search telescopes are scanning frequency and wavelengths then the computer creates the image.
But who has programmed the computer and is what this person sees what others would see?
They depict space in films movies and documentaries .
Even when it comes to maps they document certain continents a lot bigger than they are.
To make an enemy look more threating to school kids.
They say we have sate-lights that gives signal around the world.
If so why deep sea cables and so many antennas being put up.
They say the moon is how far?
Really u can see objects on the moon.
So why can u not see something on earth from 290,000 miles away it's just inside what nasa say the true edge of the atmosphere is .
They also say we know more about space than our own planet and the deep sea.
I reckon there is one reason for this .
Many humans will never be able to disprove space but if they lie about what is on the planet they could be disproven.
But it don't really matter how much they prove to be lying .
People will still eat there crap.
Please feel free to dig holes in my post .
This is why I come on here.
I don't come on hear to dig holes in what they love .
As I to still dig for space films to watch .
Good day peoples.
Read discussionThey didn't mind showing people killed in 9/11
And they don't mind showing people bombed in war .
It's all part of vampirism get people low to feed of the worry.
To me honestly if I train for a space mission and this is a dream come true.
I already know I could float off in space no chance of rescue.
Drones round the other side of the world is done by apparently bouncing frequencies of the ionosphere .
And how do you know they are not doing the controlling from and "outpost"as u put it with nibiru.
Even if you double the distance require to travel the circumference of the world .
It's not even a inch on the travel needed for mars.
And mars is not in a fix postition not that I'm saying u couldn't work out a math or formula to work out where it would be.
Just that doing the two things are massively far apart.
Look at the continent of Africa double and triple on nasa cgi.
I'm not saying space travel is fake or impossible.
I'm saying with what the science tells us of space the tech they use does not travel it.
And to believe in space travel u must be to some degree believe conspiracy.
Becuase in my view space travel can not be done with the tech they talk of.
And I heard u talk of a star that is in the red spectrum.
Does this include the in far red to
Becuase red and in far red are two different things.
Even when we talk of proof the earth our planet! Moves
The mickelson and Morley experiment failed .
They say the fualcort pendulum proves movement too but this is proven to change direction of travel.
I'm not saying we don't move or anything.
Or we don't travel space.
Just that most of what is said as fact and truth is in fact a theory.
And I agree most are the best theory to stand up to date but they are still a theory and a best guess.
When it comes to telescopes
There are what I call real telescopes that u directly look though and see an image with your eyes.
But real deep search telescopes are scanning frequency and wavelengths then the computer creates the image.
But who has programmed the computer and is what this person sees what others would see?
They depict space in films movies and documentaries .
Even when it comes to maps they document certain continents a lot bigger than they are.
To make an enemy look more threating to school kids.
They say we have sate-lights that gives signal around the world.
If so why deep sea cables and so many antennas being put up.
They say the moon is how far?
Really u can see objects on the moon.
So why can u not see something on earth from 290,000 miles away it's just inside what nasa say the true edge of the atmosphere is .
They also say we know more about space than our own planet and the deep sea.
I reckon there is one reason for this .
Many humans will never be able to disprove space but if they lie about what is on the planet they could be disproven.
But it don't really matter how much they prove to be lying .
People will still eat there crap.
Please feel free to dig holes in my post .
This is why I come on here.
I don't come on hear to dig holes in what they love .
As I to still dig for space films to watch .
Good day peoples.
12 Aug 2017 15:43:37
Space may be the final frontier
But it's made in a Hollywood basement
Lol.
Read discussionSpace may be the final frontier
But it's made in a Hollywood basement
Lol.
12 Aug 2017 01:28:50
Yes I do not doubt if the "deep state" has superior tech
It could 100% percent be possible .
But with what nasa and space x talk of no chance.
Read discussionYes I do not doubt if the "deep state" has superior tech
It could 100% percent be possible .
But with what nasa and space x talk of no chance.
12 Aug 2017 00:48:58
I think if anything can be manipulated through a conspiracy
The "timeline" people talk of deffently can
Second is nasa space and mars talk
In my personal opinion.
How do rockets work in a "vacuum"
Or them air jets they like to talk of?
U need atmosphere for rockets to thrust against to give u the thrust in the first place .
How did they get past the van Allen radiation belt
In the moon lading or to mars lol.
Hsf u like space so have u seen the latest model they talk of how the sun speeds through the universe with our planets
We would be like a flee lost forever with no fuel to get back.
Most of a rocket fuel that is used in take off so how much could the shuttle possibly carry to work rocket engines that couldn't possibly work in space
Check out how Brandon's plane thing
Soon as it was supposed to be in "space" it ignited it's engine and did a 360 in high speed when't nowhere and won't either.
Space x I swear have put mars talk back again
Nasa are a massive fraud
How on earth do they still pretend they are remotely controlling a device on mars
More like it's done in a desert and had the image altered.
Float high in our atmosphere yes
Space travel with the tech they talk of No
And it's back to conspiracy again
Becuase in my view they need much more advance than they admit technology wise to do so.
And I think this is why so many lies.
Read discussionI think if anything can be manipulated through a conspiracy
The "timeline" people talk of deffently can
Second is nasa space and mars talk
In my personal opinion.
How do rockets work in a "vacuum"
Or them air jets they like to talk of?
U need atmosphere for rockets to thrust against to give u the thrust in the first place .
How did they get past the van Allen radiation belt
In the moon lading or to mars lol.
Hsf u like space so have u seen the latest model they talk of how the sun speeds through the universe with our planets
We would be like a flee lost forever with no fuel to get back.
Most of a rocket fuel that is used in take off so how much could the shuttle possibly carry to work rocket engines that couldn't possibly work in space
Check out how Brandon's plane thing
Soon as it was supposed to be in "space" it ignited it's engine and did a 360 in high speed when't nowhere and won't either.
Space x I swear have put mars talk back again
Nasa are a massive fraud
How on earth do they still pretend they are remotely controlling a device on mars
More like it's done in a desert and had the image altered.
Float high in our atmosphere yes
Space travel with the tech they talk of No
And it's back to conspiracy again
Becuase in my view they need much more advance than they admit technology wise to do so.
And I think this is why so many lies.
12 Aug 2017 00:28:54
Like I said I don't personally care.
I bet it's just a light you can see through the telescope imagination and indoctrination does the rest.
But on the other i appreciate your view
It was an interesting theory I came across.
This is a conspiracy site last time I checked.
The way I see it if u can't do anything about it why worry.
I just replied because where I posted the other day about nibiru and u continued the thread .
In light of the facts u and ed speak of I'm not arguing with either.
I respect your views and I don't personally think the world is going to end just yet lol.
Read discussionLike I said I don't personally care.
I bet it's just a light you can see through the telescope imagination and indoctrination does the rest.
But on the other i appreciate your view
It was an interesting theory I came across.
This is a conspiracy site last time I checked.
The way I see it if u can't do anything about it why worry.
I just replied because where I posted the other day about nibiru and u continued the thread .
In light of the facts u and ed speak of I'm not arguing with either.
I respect your views and I don't personally think the world is going to end just yet lol.
12 Aug 2017 00:31:19
That is I don't care for the nibiru/ planet x/ nemisis/ dark twin
Thing to much to look overly into it sorry.
If there is nothing u can do there is no need to worry.
Read discussionThat is I don't care for the nibiru/ planet x/ nemisis/ dark twin
Thing to much to look overly into it sorry.
If there is nothing u can do there is no need to worry.
11 Aug 2017 22:41:39
Nothing wrong with the flat earth crew lol.
Read discussionNothing wrong with the flat earth crew lol.
11 Aug 2017 22:19:56
Yes hsf but the theory does state it is a dwarf star that is only visible in the infrared spectrum apparently.
And there is only one to look in that spectrum apparently.
Not to mention it 7 to 10 times larger than our planet .
Read discussionYes hsf but the theory does state it is a dwarf star that is only visible in the infrared spectrum apparently.
And there is only one to look in that spectrum apparently.
Not to mention it 7 to 10 times larger than our planet .
11 Aug 2017 21:28:39
Yes hsf there are plenty of holes in sitchin theory,
And I hear what u say.
Good post.
Read discussionYes hsf there are plenty of holes in sitchin theory,
And I hear what u say.
Good post.
11 Aug 2017 19:00:27
To be honest I don't know what to believe in regards to this.
I just listen to bits here and there and think is it possible .
I think nibiru is 1 planet of a few that is part of a mini system with its own dwarf start that is a twin to our own sun,
As 70% of stars out there are supposed to be binary.
So it is possible if 70% of systems out there in my eyes that this planet is there
Not to mention rt have openly talked about a Planet X that has the same trajectory as what sitchen spoke of.
But do I believe it, don't have a clue
But theoretically let's say some sort of advanced being on there own planet worked out how to heat a planet that has it own mini star just enough, by spraying a certain mixture in there own atmosphere that would allow this. could possibly support a life .
But again who could know .
Read discussionTo be honest I don't know what to believe in regards to this.
I just listen to bits here and there and think is it possible .
I think nibiru is 1 planet of a few that is part of a mini system with its own dwarf start that is a twin to our own sun,
As 70% of stars out there are supposed to be binary.
So it is possible if 70% of systems out there in my eyes that this planet is there
Not to mention rt have openly talked about a Planet X that has the same trajectory as what sitchen spoke of.
But do I believe it, don't have a clue
But theoretically let's say some sort of advanced being on there own planet worked out how to heat a planet that has it own mini star just enough, by spraying a certain mixture in there own atmosphere that would allow this. could possibly support a life .
But again who could know .