Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #592Talk Sense

05 Dec 2011 15:04:53
Alleged Student Abuse, Pornography Cover-up at Oxford & Cherwell Valley College

tinyurl.com/bw6xfxg

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #591Talk Sense

05 Dec 2011 10:01:59
Having just watched appollo 18, how far from the truth is it and the fact that most of the moon rocks supposedly brought on earth being either missing or unaccounted for. In hindsight, if moon landings were faked, what were those moon rocks or that's why they were lost, to stop truth about fake landing to come out? Or is it just a movie and there is nothing in it?
U.P.

 

There are plenty of moon rocks i was in america a month ago and was in a geologic museum and they had several moon rock and they where nothing like you get here on earth you could tell they weren't from earth and if man can send a self functioning robot to mar i think they could send people to the moon ,and there as loads of moon rocks on display across america anyway just most of them are still being worked on i think a more interesting question would be is if the moon was a boring waste land why spend all this time working on its rocks what minerals or materials they have found on the moon that they can exploit i personally believe man was on the moon simply because it was one of the technological and pioneering achievement of our species we finally left our planet for another world cant see why people would try to dirty it up.. its only my opinion {Ed001's Note - how did they shield the craft from the radiation in the Van Allen Belt?}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
I dont no ed but im sure it would be the same way that they protect our satellites today or the way they protect the satellites that went to mars or the rover that went to mars all of them need protection from the radiation to protect their special components , our satellites orbiting earth need protection but only if their orbit spends significant time in the radiation belts maybe they used the same methods that the ufo's use lol {Ed001's Note - they don't need protecting, radiation is not going to give a satellite cancer is it? Perhaps you should read up about why it is that the Shuttle would only go so far from the Earth, because you will find it is the difficulty shielding it that stops it. The Apollo missions certainly had no shielding capable of blocking it.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I think you should read up more about satellites then my friend as well as your mobile phones your internet would not work with out protecting the satellite that witch it works off the components witch work the satellites today are very complex and very fragile ,, radiation does not jst effect life it also effects technoligie as well my friend {Ed001's Note - not in the same way and check the satellites orbit and you will find they are this side of the Van Allen Belt and never enter it. So your point is irrelevant.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Satellites do cross into it and can be protected against the radiation protection is protection ,, the radiation has to be stopped from damaging the satellites if they can protect satellites they they can protect astronauts {Ed001's Note - if you say so. But you are talking about protecting tiny little parts from radiation damage, not a human being. Obviously you don't understand how much weight that would add to the equation, and that would increase the power needed to launch massively.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not agreeing/disagreeing but in regards to the Van Allen Belt and Astronauts this is the explanation provided on Wiki, checked the sources quoted "The Apollo astronauts traveled through the Van Allen radiation belts on the way to the moon; however, exposure was minimized by following a trajectory along the edge of the belts that avoided the strongest areas of radiation.[18] The total radiation exposure to astronauts was estimated to be much less than the five (5) rem set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity"

Dutch {Ed001's Note - if that was the case, why could they not continue to travel that path with the Shuttle?}
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Read all 11 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #590Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 23:33:34
I look at this as one big game. Who will win the War.
You have the US supplying weapons to everyone, Israel with aparent Nuclear bombs, the Nazis, russians, turks with secret weaponry....bla bla bla....The most successful and feared country will rule the world. Smoke a joint and you'll realize lol This is one huge war game.

Azza

 

Amen to that war will never be won its just been postponed
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #589Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 23:23:38
Around a month ago The israelis come on to a turkish boat via helicopter and shot a few turkish troops because they were sending aid to the palastines. When asked about it the israilis denied it ever happend however People on the boat were adamant the attack came from the jews. Discussions are still going on as to whether The turks should take further action. The turks were a very strong force many years ago wouldn't like to anger them to be honest. Just something i thought i should share.

Azza

 

Thanks for sharing mate sounds interesting - n ur right the turks can kick ass lol
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
They might have been a nasty bunch in the first war and their football thugs might be handy against lost football fans but they would last about 5 minutes in a modern firefight against the yanks, russians or chinese.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Thats your opinion and you may well be right but i have to disagree. At this day and age theres no one on one fight, If Turkey were to go to war i'm pretty sure and confident they will be backed by Germany who were also a major force back then. They don't lose their hunger and knowledge over night. Its just like if America go to war they will be backed by us. Don't underestimate 2 countrys who have stayed out of the lime light. They don't run their mouths like us and the Yanks. The less they stay out of the lime light the more time they can go undetected in developing their bombs lol. You just don't know these days.

Azza
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
You also should know that it is (or at least was not too long ago) compulsary for turkish men to serve for their country in some form of armed service. So taking that into account and if there was a war thats alot of potential soldiers who could step up. Thats not including the sheer size of turkey and their population
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
PLenty of countries still have national service doesn't make them a power. The Turks couldn't even get the Greeks out of Cyprus so that ends ur obvious weak armed forces knowledge.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

Read all 8 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #588Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 23:17:32
does anyone think that there is no such thing as usa vs russia and that they are just using all these excuses to kill of a few more people to keep population down. us brits should make friends with russia and be peace keepers.

im gonna rant here but there is no need for these wars fighting is not needed we are all part of this earth and we are neigbours of each other and dont believe all this bulls##t of we've got enough power to end the world 1000's of times over who in their right mind would have that much power to kill them selves and end human life?

i won't say to much you never know who's watching or who wants to silence you because of x, y & z

remember DTA(dont trust anyone)

 

Friends with Russia? We operate alongside America on all fronts especially when concerning the Russians the cold war may be over but there is still no trust and a recent increase in Russian weapons ensures there is uneasy times ahead again
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
The americans are the aggressors here, along with Britain and Israel, look into the military industrial complex. JR
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
I agree with the above post but I wouldn't trust Russia or China either
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
America and china sell dead bodies for research they also sell body parts (fancy a Kidney?) from people who are still alive, at least the russians don't do this.

So while no country can be trusted not even your own America is one of the least to be trusted
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Been reading a few things lately about biblical prophecies, very much believed that the following=

King of the North- Revived holy Roman Empire( Church of Rome and German led- always has been)

King of the South- Iran

But there is also mention of an army consiting of 1million soldiers, China/ Russia.

Who knows.........................we will just have to wait and see
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #587Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 23:15:24
silly question but what effect would WW3 have on us? If there was one.

Azza

{Ed033's Note - You would expect that WW3 would culminate in thermal nuclear strikes.}

 

There will NEVER be a nuclear strike . Think about it..........

Nothing to gain , just radiation sickness for everyone . No crops , oil production or industry .

Nuclear war - everybody loses
No Nuclear war , but the threat exists - everybody does what they're told .


jimi88
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
That's the plan, read the Georgia guide stone's, research population reduction, they'd be delighted with a nuclear war !

{Ed033's Note - The ruling class have the idea that they can go into their underground bunkers just before the nuclear strikes with army personnel plus a few scientists and then emerge afterwards and round up whoever is left as slaves and start again. This appears to be their wet dream.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
So you feel that man will not use nuclear weapons on fellow man? A little foolhardy, I would suggest. Maybe you are right though.......................there is SO much love in this world of ours. It will happen
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
There will be NO nuclear holocaust , period . The weapons they possess are vastly more powerful than the two dropped on Japan . USA , China and Russia claim to have thousands of these warheads and that they are capable of poisoning our entire atmosphere for many decades , maybe centuries .

Who gains from that ?

Answers on the back of a stamp , to the usual address .

jimi88
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Jimi, get a fkn grip. There will be a nuclear war, and it will probably be not too far in the future. Do you believe that every one who has access to these weapons, is rational in their thoughts? Don t know if you have noticed the amount of suicide bombings etc that go on. All it takes is for a ROGUE unit to get theri hands on these weapons, do you think MAN will cure all the problems in the world first? Gonna be a strong wind blowing soon.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 8 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #586Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 21:14:16
Anyone else watching black mirror on 4? think the opening answers my post on MI 5 controlling the media.

 

It was bizarre. And if you mean the d notices, then that goes on a lot as well. If you haven't seen it i think you would the Jason Statham film Bank Job which covers similar area's. With a more believeable plot.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #585Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 21:05:08
The Cold war propaganda is rearing its ugly head again, Russia and the US continue to flex their muscles with threats of "if you do this we will do that". Syria and Iran will probably be the tipping point, does anybody else find it strange that all the troubles in Libya, Syria and Egypt kicked off at the same time at a guess i would think the US stirred up the hornets nest, maybe even as one of the ED's suggested NATO sent in hired guns to make sure the 'job' was done right.

I also don't understand how the media manage to get people worked up about Iran 'possibly' having a nuclear warhead when Britain, America and Russia have enough of an arsenal to destroy the world 1000's of times over, surely that is the very definition of hypocritical. Also if Iran were to attack Israel not with not with missiles but with troops on the ground (which is impossible as they would have to go through Iraq to get their) would it not be just? Israel have not become the power they have by pure luck, on the surface it appears they pander to Americas ego needing protection, but if you dig a little deeper you see that door swings both ways.

I know this is a bit of a rant so i will try and wrap it up. my history is not great but during the 90's didn't the US claim to be going into Iraq (the first time) because Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and also order the extermination of the Kurdish people, now fast forward 20 years Turkey are in the EU (well more or less in) and Turkish and US forces are fighting against the terrorist cell called the PKK. What a difference 20 years makes once a people in need of protection and now terrorists that need to be dealt with. Although during the 80's while Russia was in Afghanistan America backed the Afghans will all the money and weapons they could spare and now look.

The less people watch the news or read the papers the better, the media is a very powerful brain washing machine. I would imagine less than 10% of it is eventrue, this scene from Good Morning Vietnam probably isn't too far from the truth.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UY2uw3yoIA

great site ed the links posted are always interesting lets hope more and more people see through the lies and stop all this evil and injustice in the world.

always a red

 

How will we be able to get info if we can read the paper or watch the news. Not having a go i'm just intrested because i want ot learn more.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I wouldn't say can't watch the news or read the paper, but just take it with a pinch of salt. The only news i watch is 'The Daily Show with Jon Stewart' purely because he points out the madness of Fox News and their Republican masters, and that's always good for a laugh.

If you look on the internet you come across some genuinely interesting and eye opening stuff. But even then you have to keep your own mind and take from it what you like.

always a red
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Thats the thing, everyone has their own bias, non of them are 100% reliable, its all down to your own personal bias.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #584Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 19:15:21
US spy drone claimed to have been shot down over Iran.

2 theories.

1. Iran made it up and have some wreckage they;ve taken from Iraq or Afghan and mocked it up to claim they have shot down a spy drone and put pressure on the US regards these sanctions.

2. America let them shoot down an old drone although not sure why.

Yes i am rejecting the obvious one cos if you were using any kind of spy craft over a hostile country, and i do agree that the yanks are, then you'd use soemthing that wouldn't get shot down. Or more likely with the tech the yanks have i don't think the Iranians would have anyhting that could touch them hence theory 1 or 2.

 

Very possible both off your theories,probably never be told the real story anyway...why was the drone flying over Iran?Is it legal for the U.S to fly the drone in another countries airspace?Tbh the U.S are a bigger threat to the world than Iran.
Agree · 6 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #583Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 18:31:28
It makes me laugh how so many people come on here slating the Yanks and prasing the Russians, and then you see stuff like just on the BBC news.

Putin's got the army out by the Kremlin in these huge trucks, no reason given just blatent intimidation.

The BBC in a crowd trying to talk to this elderly geezer who was giving his legitimate complaints when he gets dragged off by about 4 burly blokes in uniform.

Then you have the opposition guy syaing their boycotting the elections cos of various shady tricks of Putins.

And yet some people reckon the Russians are alright, the good guys, the saviours from the nasty yanks.

Now i will admit the yanks have issues but i'd say the Russians have even bigger issues. They really are sliding back into a police state, give it 5 years and Putin will be outlawing all other parties.

 

I think both are bad but the yanks are much much worse,the russians dont need the faceoff with usa as the russians are a very weathly country with the oil and natural minerals, as for uncle sam who owe over 13 trillion dollars, they know in twenty years time that they wont be a magor superpower and that makes them scarey now. Frankyscouse
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Bear in mind the russians only know about all that mneral wealth because of the yanks. the svoiets ignored it for years, and didn't have the captial to exploit it anyway. That changed in the 90's, it was US banks lending to Russian companies that enabled them to get in there and exploit it.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
The usa banks lending money, are you havig a laugh? The usa banks have been lending money from china,japan and germany for the past 30 years to build there space programs and to fight there wars, frankyscouse
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Er yeah go have a look at how much US banks lent the Russians in the 90's.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
The yanks never lent russia nothing, infact they wanted them to bleed dry when the soviet union broke up in to different nations,thats were uncle sam stepped in with there comercial franchise, eg mcdonalds,burger king etc etc,like i said i think russia are bad in there own right, but the yanks are utter evil, you prob think if it wernt for tom and jerry we would be speeking german by now. Frankyscouse
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #582Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 13:42:22
ed, you mentioned that the crown corporation could be controlling the US, but what i don't understand is why would the US take orders from them? and do as they tell them? what does the crown corporation have over the US that makes them keep in line?

thanks

keightley!

{Ed033's Note - The USA federal government is supposed to have shared powers between the 3 branches of government, judicial, legislative and executive branches. The executive branch has now been given the full power over the other 2 branches. As all of the states in American are controlled via the federal government, if you control the executive branch, you control the USA. The executive branch is allegedly controlled from the "City of London".}

 

Keightley here is some further info for you:

www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=126&contentid=1281

www.americanpendulum.com/2011/05/world-economic-superpower-the-crown-corporation-of-london/

not much but keep digging
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I read on the website you linked us that the british empire never died it was just renamed to the united states of america, does this have something to do with the crown corporate ?
(bare with me ed im still learning about this stuff)
keightley!

{Ed033's Note - Go here - www.richplanet.net/starship.php
Scroll to the bottom of the page and click on any "watch" link and watch then after you have watched the 3 parts click on another "watch" link.

People use different terminology to describe the same thing and have a slightly different perspective on things. The "British Empire" run from the "City Of London" includes the USA or at least "The Crown Corporation" think so.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Thanks ed.

keightley!
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Keightley sometimes in business a company gets too big so parts get split off into different divisions.

1776 was one of those instances.

Look at how anti British Obama was when first elected and look at the change since he first came to London to meet his boss.

I wouldn't say that the CC had full control of America, more like Senior partner/ Junior partner in the same firm. CC advises on certain things they would like to see done and the junior partner goes and does it.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #581Talk Sense

04 Dec 2011 14:35:04
immunization as a child? the start of the dumbing down process?

 

{Ed033's Note - Obviously vaccines make the medical cartel a huge amount of money but later on in life these vaccines allegedly cause health problems as well.

From a control point of view. It is easier to control a population that is in ill health.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Or even piggyback in on the shot another disease or something that targets certain genes or whatnot.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.