Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
02 Feb 2020 21:25:40 Just finished watching the 2nd video you posted with the interview with David Paulides.
The evidence really is mind bending and makes no logical sense. The thing I am most sure about though is that the National Park's and FBI are hiding things. Whether they actually know what's going on or they are covering up the fact they don't understand what they do know, I am not sure.
The tracker dogs not being able to pick up any sort of scent is just weird. Have tracker dogs ever acted this way, with a control environment in place, or has it only happened on these cases? I guess it could be tested to some degree.
The suggestion that the 'wind noises' picked up on some of the phone calls and the possibility of it being the victim being lifted into the air, did cross my mind. But surely, no matter your age, that would make you scream or shout out? . You could freeze up. But all of the cases? .
As illogical as it sounds, vanishing into thin air seems more likely. Brought that video you posted on inter-dimensional beings and the US government, to mind.
{Ed033's Note - No doubt the National Parks and FBI are hiding things. It's likely that no one really knows exactly what's going on, but the 'authorities' want to keep it all quiet.
Below is a discussion about Dave Paulides' latest video - Missing 411 The Hunted, an expansion of his book Missing 411, Hunters Unexplained Disappearances, which focuses on 5 strange cases all involving capable hunters.
03 Feb 2020 07:14:26 Thanks Ed. Really fascinated by this subject, not heard evidence as portrayed by D. Paulidses before. Maybe because its suppressed?
I would like to get some of his books, but they are quite pricey.
I am always on the look out for high value info books though, on the cheap. Just got blacks law 7th edition delivered for £6 so happy with that. Only problem is now I am studying legalese and Fomenko, at the same time as all this other stuff. TBH, loving it! . Mind for filled.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, all these subjects we've covered on here over the last 3 months has made it a joy to get up and delve deeper. Much better than the mainstream keeping your mind in a tiny box with their dis info.
You could go into your local library and see if they could order in 1 or more of his books?
03 Feb 2020 19:46:32 I Listened to the podcast above and then went on to watch the film 'Missing 411 The Hunted' and I don't know what to add other than the fact I agree that none of it adds up.
At the end of the film there are a couple of cases that are not missing people but more paranormal experiences.
One of these cases was at a camp that Ron Morehead set up at a secret remote location in the 1950's with four of his close friends. The went every year to hunt together.
They started to hear strange noises at the start of the seventies and on a return trip they took recording equipment with them.
All of the audio has been checked for it being fake and 'experts' in the field said there was no way it could have been.
There is actual video in the movie but there is nothing of note to be seen in these, it is what you can hear that's important. I found the actual audio recordings. Be interested in others opinions on this, but it has freaked me out a bit. Cold shivers.
03 Feb 2020 21:11:32 I am not the people that made these recordings. But if I was camping somewhere deep in the middle of nowhere, and heard sounds like these. I assure you the last thing that I would be doing is going back anywhere near the place.
These sounds have been analysed by a professor ( I will find his name out if you want me too) and his expert opinion is that these creatures are around 7 and a half to eight and a half feet tall, with a vastly superior vocal range to humans, by going higher and lower in pitch than human frequencies.
You can definitely hear what appears to be a language amongst the sounds.
02 Feb 2020 17:48:57 Ed033 and anyone else who'd like to chime in, I was just wondering what is your stance on God and/ or religion. I have a series of questions relating to this if you wouldn't mind?
1). Do you believe in God?
2). In what sense do you believe in God? Are you monothiestic, polytheistic or something else?
3). Given that there are a number of different religious ideologies around the world, with a lot of them having multiple Gods, are they all real Gods, fake, or misinterpretations?
4). Are you open to the idea that you could be wrong about your views on God? Whether you believe or not.
5). If you are open to the idea of being wrong, what would it take to prove you wrong? For example if you don't believe in God, you may say something along the lines of "I want to see God personally". Or if you do believe in God it may be something like "finding life on another planet".
6). Assuming you were wrong in your beliefs, what would you turn to instead? This applies to both believers and non-believers.
{Ed033's Note - These are all mainstream ideas / concepts. This is not a mainstream site.
Anyway, i now default to us living inside a non moving, closed system creation where the closest model that might be correct is the Flat Earth model.
If i see better evidence that the Geocentric model is correct then it's still a Creation in my mind and i move to thinking the Geocentric model is correct.
If i see better evidence that the Heliocentric model is correct then it's still a Creation in my mind and i move to thinking the Heliocentric model is correct.
Whichever the one above, as it's a Creation, then there has to be a Creator or Creators and religion doesn't come into it.
02 Feb 2020 21:19:35 You said wrong 4 times HSF. How can anyone even begin to consider the the concept of God within such a rigid and narrow mindset? You have such a black and white view of the world it’s a wonder you even bother to come on here.
02 Feb 2020 21:24:17 What are your answers to these questions you write, hsf?
1. I believe there are things at play that are beyond my comprehension and if I say anymore it will be pure conjecture. I guess I believe in seeking the truth.
2. conjecture
3. Not a direct answer but there seems to be similar concepts in all religions the main one I think of is the 'Great Flood'. I'm of the belief antediluvian history is being hidden from us all. I can only assume hiding anything has an evil purpose and it is controlling information which creates a lack of trust.
4. I will happily admit I am wrong when shown to be so. As I have previously stated. I seek the truth.
5. The truth, if against my opinion, would prove me wrong. The only person to have supposedly met God in mortal form is Enoch. Maybe read his book. Although it is non-canonical. (Why is that? )
03 Feb 2020 11:03:40 Rian, I'm just interested in the other side of the fence's views, why they believe in them and what would they do if they are wrong. There is nothing narrow minded about that, I'm not looking to try and prove people wrong. Maybe I'm wrong but I figured narrow minded views were ones which fail to acknowledge the concept of there being a different answer/ view/ theory etc?
SM.
1). No.
2). None.
3). Misinterpretations. I think there are a lot of stories from holy books that are very similar to one another, from different time periods and different parts of the world. I personally think that the majority of stories may well be true, but I think a lot can be explained by things like asteroid or comet impacts and extra-solar phenomenen.
For example, approximately 13,000 years ago a comet impacted Greenland. This caused mass flooding on several continents, caused the whole of north america to set fire and almost ended human life on the planet. It's estimated that we may have gone down to as little as 100,000 in population globally!
4). Of course.
5). I'm not going to lie, it would take quite a bit to convince me that God is real. Simply because of how Gods are depicted in the different cultures. So for this I would say I need to see God do something from one of the holy books, like part the sea or bring something that's been dead for 3 days back to life. There are things which would make me more open to the idea, seeing some genuine paranormal activity like a ghost that just randomly throws my quilt off my bed, would definitely make me think twice.
6). If God came to me and parted the sea before my eyes as an example of proof, my next step would be to ask what I need to do in life. Then whatever was said to me would be exactly what I'd do. I mean I'd have no choice really. But if it was proven that God isn't real and what I believe in also turned out to be false, then I'd just wait for evidence to point me in the right direction.
03 Feb 2020 21:59:09 Just to point out something regarding your example in your response to question 3, hsf.
You are just replacing ancient stories apparently told for thousands of years and believed by most of the inhabitants of this planet, with stories from MS science.
There are no cold hard facts to either. You either believe what you are told or you don't.
You will probably reply with something like "they explain this and that and it all makes sense". (this and that is poetic license to shorten this post :) )
But there are people that have done studies on crazy possibilities, like for instance, the recent study on fallen Titans that Ed033 posted. Watch that series of 6-7 videos. You may not believe it but the evidence is there if you want to believe.
That is kind of my point really. You have to take a leap of faith, of sorts, in whatever you believe. It's just that I think the people in charge of the stories in the mainstream have the most to gain from whatever they want to tell us.
04 Feb 2020 08:18:28 What if you’re wrong hsf? Have you considered the possibility? Free yourself from the programming. Most people here are looking for the truth. Right or wrong doesn’t really come into it.
01 Feb 2020 16:24:56 Yes. Because we have mirrors up there that we bounce lasers off, so we can accurately measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon. These were planted into the Moon on the very first Moon landing.
{Ed033's Note - But can't you only bounce lasers off of something over a short distance because the laser light spreads out the further it is from the source?
If the Moon is 225,623 miles away, the laser light would be miles across and so it wouldn't work.
Also by NASA saying there are mirrors on the Moon doesn't mean there are mirrors on the Moon.
If there are mirrors on the Moon why can't we be told exactly where the mirrors are so we can have a look at them through telescopes and why can't we have a go at bouncing lasers off the mirrors if it's possible?
01 Feb 2020 18:07:01 I know nothing of lasers so I couldn't comment on that.
It's actually publicly available where the locations are. It's the landing sites for Apollo 11, 14 and 15. As well as Luna 17 and 21.
And the reason we can't do it from home, is because lasers that powerful are not available for commercial use. As I said earlier, I know nothing of lasers but I did find this reddit post from someone who worked on the APOLLO (observatory, not the rockets) project.
03 Feb 2020 10:21:06 On one of the vids either Ed033 or SM posted recently there is a reference to a laser test successfully being done in the early sixties by both the US and the Russians. Who put the mirrors up for that test? Or is it the science that is flawed?
If it comes from NASA, it’s propaganda. Next you’ll be quoting Neil de Grasse Tyson.
03 Feb 2020 19:48:37 1. So does that also mean Ruscosmos, European Space Agency, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, China Nations Space Agency and the Indian Space Research Organisation are all propaganda tools too? Because these agencies are regularly pumping out news stories that corroborate what NASA say, even though they do their own research and development.
2. On April 8th 2002, I watched the space shuttle Atlantis take off from the Kennedy Space center - was that fake?
3. And aside from being slightly annoying like a hyperactive child, what's wrong with Neil de Grasse Tyson? He's one of the top scientists of the 21st century, along with Sean Carroll, Brian Cox, Carl Sagan, etc.
{Ed033's Note - 1. There is no difference between NASA and the other Space Agencies
2. I don't doubt you saw something leave the ground and go into the air
3. They're not "top scientists", they're top dis info agents
01 Feb 2020 11:10:12 One quick question for people who think the heliocentric model and all that goes with it is real is, where did all the water on Earth come from originally?
01 Feb 2020 15:49:18 Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud are the most likely candidates. The most widely used and believed theory is that it all came from comet impacts, there is a lot of evidence to suggest this. It's not conclusive and it's something that they've been trying to get a definitive answer for quite a while now.
There is also another theory that was gathering pace a few months ago, that suggested our planet got it's water from a major collision with another planet. That planet being the hypothetical "Theia" which smashed into us a few billion years ago. This collision is also widely believed to be the reason our moon formed too.
youtube.com/watch?v=RB5eUdHub8M
{Ed033's Note - Thanks for the response hsf, it would be good to get to the bottom of this because we are talking about a huge amount of water here.
I'm not a mainstream space guy, but there seems to be a few questions to ask.
Comets?:
1. Don't you think the water/ice on the comets would be vaporised in the atmosphere before reaching the ground of Earth?
2. How did the water get onto the comets?
3. How many comets would it take to fill up the Earth with water?
4. How did the comets know when to stop bringing water here after the Earth was full up with water?
5. How do the comets know to come to Earth?
6. Where is the water originally created?
Another planet?:
7. How did this hypothetical "Theia" get water on it in the first place?
8. If the water flew off hypothetical "Theia" into space wouldn't it instantaneously freeze in space?
9. How did the water get through the atmosphere without being vaporised?
10. According to the heliocentric model, wouldn't Earth still be molten rock a few billion years ago?
11. Wouldn't gravity on the other planet keep the water on the other planet?
12. If gravity can't hold water onto the sides of the planet, wouldn't the water have already been sucked off by the vacuum of space?
There's probably loads of other questions if people thought about it.
01 Feb 2020 17:33:34 At this point in time I am pretty sure you will only get conjecture as answers for all these questions.
They only thing that I can say is fact, is how they try to figure out where the water came from.
They use a deuterium/ hydrogen isotopic ratio. Water from comets have 3 times the ratio of Earths water, which is why they think it came from the asteroids which have a similar ratio to that of Earths.
Every theory for these questions would be so hard to prove or even disprove. Make's me think of that quote from Tesla.
01 Feb 2020 17:45:32 These are all fair questions Ed. Some of them likely don't have definitive answers as of yet.
1). The water would likely vapourise on impact yes, however Earths gravity would stop the gas phase water from leaving our planet and it would end up being stored in the atmosphere. Over millions of years the planet would be showered with intense rains, eventually forming oceans. Water can also be stored in the mantle on a molecular level, so not all of the it would be vapourised on impact, but instead forced into and absorbed by the mantle.
2). Supernova. During a stars life time it's core is fusing atoms to create new atoms, the older the star the heavier the atoms being fused. In the beginning, the stars will fuse atoms to create light elements such as hydrogen and helium, toward the stars end, it will be creating heavy elements such as Iron and Gold. When the stars core has "filled up" so to speak, it succumbs to it's gravity and goes supernova. This releases all of the fused atoms out into space at 99% the speed of light and creates giant nebulae that span light years across. It's within these nebulae that everything is formed. Stars, asteroids, planets, comets and moons.
3). Lots, that's the only way to put it. The standard model suggests that during the "proto" phase of the solar system, every single planet that formed was finding it's correct orbital path in relation to other planets. During this time the Oort cloud and Kuiper Belt were disturbed by huge gravitational forces like Jupiter and Neptune, this caused large volumes of comets to come inward towards the Sun. Using the Moon as evidence (based on crator impacts), it's thought that we were hit with thousands of comets in a few million years.
4). The comets stopped bombarding us once the orbital paths of the gas giants were settled. The best way to explain this is to show you a simulation of a solar system formation. This video is from the California Academy of Sciences, and shows how we believe solar systems are formed. youtube.com/watch?v=yXq1i3HlumA
5). Can be explained via the solar system formation simulation above.
6). Inside a Stars core. See #2
7). I've not looked into the Theia hypothesis too much, but I did read that it was thought to be an ocean world. So that could mean it formed in a Hydrogen and Oxygen rich area of a solar system. As those are the two atoms needed to make water. However, that would just be using my own logic as I haven't looked into it.
8). Yes, some of it would. The Earth used to have rings around it, much like Saturn did, and we still do have a very, very faint ring around us. This was caused by the collision between Earth and Theia, with large amounts of rock, ice and mantle being ejected into space, then coalescing in our orbit due to gravity and forming the Moon. Which by the way has large deposits of water ice, as well as an iron core. Samples of Moon rock taken from the Moon showed that the composition of the Moon is almost identical to Earth, which means it must have been a part of Earth at some point.
9). Large amounts of it would have been vaporised. But it's an enormous body of water that's bound to a rocky planet estimated to be between Mars and Venus in size. Comets are an example of water making it through the atmosphere and they are much smaller in size.
10). Yes, Earth was more or less a molton ball of rock during its early stages, it took a billion or so years for it to cool down enough to form a crust over the mantle. Funnily enough, it's thought that the first moment life could appear on the planet, it did. Which bodes well for people who believe we're not alone in the universe.
11). Yes, but Theia was obliterated on impact and Earth is a bigger volume of mass, so has stronger gravity.
12). I'm not sure if I'm understanding the question properly, is this a follow on question to #11? If so, then it being obliterated would explain why it couldn't hold it's water.
01 Feb 2020 22:39:10 hsf. You very well 'educated'. Have you any personal experiences on these matters? or is it all spoon fed?
{Ed033's Note - You mean very well schooled.
If you just take question 1 of mine, In the heliocentric model there is no way any water at any time can get through the atmosphere to the surface of Earth because the atmosphere constantly burns everything up/vaporises it.
01 Feb 2020 16:23:19 You can spin that kind of arguement any way you want. Here is a good example of doing it.
Who would you rather vote for to run the country? An alcoholic who is prone to domestic abuse, as well as smoking 60 a day. Or a vegan who loves animals and doesn't drink or smoke?
If you picked the 2nd one, well congrats you picked Hitler over Churchill. In these kind of things you have to list everything, you can't just cherry pick one good thing from the "woke" side and then list 10 bad things for the mainstream view. That's called confirmation bias.
01 Feb 2020 17:48:53 OK, fair point, but I think you missed mine? . I basically meant that, the people who have control over everything get to choose what the answers are, regardless of whether they are right or wrong (in the greater picture) .
The thing is, you have to dig around, out of the MS slant on things, to find out these facts about Churchill and Hitler. And if you dig deeper enough you actually start to piece together the truth and not the MS 'spin'.
I guess I tried and failed to compact what I was thinking, into the original OP, so people would understand. It appeared obvious to me, but you more than likely think in a different way. So wouldn't be so clear.
{Ed033's Note - The mainstream people can't think like the open minded people. They can only repeat things they've heard from the mainstream.
30 Jan 2020 21:31:32 I just watched the documentary 'Missing 411' and I can't imagine what these families are going through.
Its one thing that a nation park wouldn't keep any sort of record on people that go missing within its boundaries and then want to charge over $1,000,000 to release the files, they don't have? . But for the FBI not to consider that a child that has gone missing under these circumstances, would not be linked to any sort of criminal activity is quite frankly shocking! .
{Ed033's Note - The more you listen to David Paulides the more weird it gets and as he said there are no answers. I posted to an interview on here before where people go missing in urban areas:
30 Jan 2020 00:00:31 How hard would it be to change the history of a nation?
In today's age, I would say quite hard what, with social media, the internet and general connectivity to everything.
50-100 years ago is a whole, other matter and the further you go back, even easier to achieve. It does make you think. Well, at least it does, me. It was different back then.
Sadly, the Fomenko books are not something you can read in 20-30min sections. It needs large chunks of time to digest/ study/ research, to understand on the level that I like to understand. Hopefully I can do that soon. It does all seem linked to a few of your recent post with tartarian/ tartary history which appears to be unwanted parts that don't comply with the MSBS.
{Ed033's Note - It would be much easier if there was a huge catastrophe such as a flood. I have put up example videos that people are calling 'mud flood' before (These 'mud flood' examples seem to be worldwide). Then they implement a 'reset' and make up a fake history of the area.
What probably happened is that there was a huge flood over most of the world and a giant 'reset' took place. There may have been multiple 'resets' in the past.
30 Jan 2020 08:42:05 Yeah the 'mud flood' videos you posted are quite compelling. Think you got me on to the channel 'Wise Up' on YT? . His videos made a lot of sense and it does look like solidified mud/ ash (forming a type of concrete) covering buildings etc.
Its trying to get this one into perspective that's difficult. I think I am right in saying that every religion has it's own version of a 'Great Flood'? . And this would all tie in with the 'petrified giant tree' theory (which has made me see nothing but trees every time I look at a mountain, now, if I'm honest) .
Then we have the 'petrified Titans' and the very thorough research done by the channel you refer to on a particular mountain. The fact these people/ channels show you why they think what they do, rather than telling what is so. To me, makes it all the more convincing. It's just such a mind blowing topic.
{Ed033's Note - Wise Up is probably correct and makes sense with the ash. Yes it seems that hills can also be slag heaps from the past, but hills and mountains i think are petrified fauna and flora, with almost of it being petrified giant trees.
The Stellium7 yt channel showing the stone that anyone would have to come to the conclusion is a petrified heart with the MUDFOSSILS - The HEART of the Matter - Part 1. and the unveiling a titan series which shows a mountain is a giant petrified elephant.
If people don't think mountains are petrified giant trees then they can take a look at the hangman1128 yt channel and watch the original forest on flat earth videos.
30 Jan 2020 21:39:53 My brother, who calls me a 'Unicorn hunter', saw some of hangman1128's videos and said "they really do actually look like trees! ".
It's amazing how people (myself included) cannot see what is right in front of their eyes, because they aren't looking for it.
{Ed033's Note - You can tell him you found it now - picture below it's called unicorn nebula:
30 Jan 2020 23:00:08 Haha. I am surprised I haven't heard of that.
As I have said before, I have dabbled in astro-photography and even tough I still don't know what I am looking at, I still amaze in its wonder.
This is a link to someone I know that compiled a 400 hour exposure. I can go into the actual specs but they aren't needed. Basically if you print this to actual size it would be 8 metres tall.
Wide view of Orion: (or the Firmament in all its glory?)
30 Jan 2020 00:02:29 Not seen the 1962 footage before, is that for real? . haha did the guy who was supposed to be the 'face on the moon', forget to come to work that day?
{Ed033's Note - The question is whether in the 1960s, people would think that video is real. It's likely the fakers of it, realised they need to do better.
Will people in 50 years time, look at the current space cgi and know it's fake?
28 Jan 2020 21:46:13 "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing." - Plato.
It's amazing how many like-minded people that wrongly tell me what I am trying to portrait, because they being conspiratorial too, know it all already. And miss what I am trying to tell them. Again falling back on the mainstream BS
The people that were awakened are falling back asleep. Are they not? .
30 Jan 2020 00:14:55 I got to that point around 2 months ago. Then just let go of everything I have 'been taught' and started looking for myself. Very strangely everything, on the whole, seem to make, much more sense (or what I knew made more nonsense)
I was one of the few that asked you to start the 'Space and Astrophysics' page. I can't bring myself to study that at this time. Too many things I have seen make that seem pointless until other questions are answered. Consequently, my humble book collection has taken a very, vivid turn in direction.
{Ed033's Note - It seems they've lied to us about everything we can think of and all we can do is think and investigate things ourselves.
