Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #5766Talk Sense

27 Aug 2017 10:22:22
George Orwell - A Final Warning to we the people.

 

Rian
29 Aug 2017 15:59:52
A visionary who left this world far too soon.

"Sanity is not statistical. "
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2185Talk Sense

26 Aug 2017 20:49:45
Not totally conspiracy related, but i've been watching a lot of Milo on youtube these days. And because we talk so much here about waking up. How much of what he's saying is about waking the people up or is he just boosting his ideology. A perspective from the ed would be most welcome.

 

{Ed033's Note - My perspective is Milo might 'wake up' people a tiny amount, as with Milo it's more about himself.

Whereas Stefan Molyneux youtube channel will 'wake people up' a heck of a lot more.

But if people really want to 'wake up', then you move on from Stefan Molyneux to Red Ice Radio.

Moving straight to Red Ice Radio maybe too much of a jump for most people, so Stefan Molyneux's youtube channel is a good place to go next.
southampton87
27 Aug 2017 16:12:55
Stephan Molyneux is an excellent truth speaker

Red ice radio, I do listen to and what I hear doesn't bother me, but I sometimes cringe when I hear something the p.c. crowd cry about, but still a very good station for truth.

Milo is Milo.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
jamesmack8
29 Aug 2017 08:59:28
If your looking for some podcasts to listen too I recommend Those Conspiracy Guys. Few lads from Ireland who go through a number of different theories. Funny and some good info. Google them and the list of podcasts are at the bottom of the page.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5765Talk Sense

25 Aug 2017 13:10:31
Latest Richplanet show - Dying of Ignorance - Andrew Johnson and Richard D. Hall discuss the main stream lies about AIDS and HIV, cancer, vaccines and diabetes.

Part 1 of 3.

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5764Talk Sense

24 Aug 2017 13:03:11
Wayne Jett speaks about the ruling elite's agenda to be followed by the elite written in a book around 1901 by H.G. Wells.

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5763Talk Sense

22 Aug 2017 14:52:34
Clif High tells us more info on Antarctica, giants and the Dogon tribe - Nommo Legends and human origins. Antarctica info starts at around 16:30.

 

southampton87
23 Aug 2017 00:02:46
Interesting vid ed cheers for posting.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, one of the better ones.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11542Talk Sense

22 Aug 2017 10:28:35
Why does the Sun's gravity that is stronger than Earth's, not capture Earth's moon during a solar eclipse?

 

Monkeyballz
22 Aug 2017 15:10:58
Because the Moon is closer to the Earth. Gravity's strength on an object, involves mass and distance.

Either that or the Sun just doesn't like cheese.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 15:24:53
So monkeyballz
I know gravity is to do with mass
But how do you know the true mass of our planet or moon
You can guess a best educated one
But till you go through the entire earth you will not know the mass
To judge the effect of gravity will have
And from what we are told we have only ever got 7 miles.

Think the sun not likening cheese. Is the more accurate guess lol.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
gerrymcgin
22 Aug 2017 19:26:14
southampton87, i'm going to go with the educated best guess as the earth and moon have not as far as i'm aware been sucked into the sun. this page used to be informative and based on research and facts or best available. it now seems to be full on "ill take the furthest away from the main stream". i believe in the supernatural etc but not to the detriment of evidence. of course our science is off, yet we manage heart transplants. of course our governments feed us nonsense. but just howling at the moon constantly takes away from our belief that there IS more. relax man.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
23 Aug 2017 00:01:52
Tesla gives real science, John Hutchinson, Ralph Ring, these people talk real science. The Main stream are not allowed to.
Medical science was achieved by learning and testing over centuries and a lot longer
Science and physics are not the same as cutting and stitching.

I'm not trying to ruin anything And there is a lot more out there, but as long as people go with what they are given without questioning, we will just go in circles never learning what is really possible.

Sorry if I have ruined something because that isn't what I was meaning to do
There is even proof of the supernatural. Within the skull experiments I think that is what it is told.

What I post about is what people can show and demonstrate through experiments you can watch yourself, but my phone will not let me copy and paste.
but I know what you mean.
{Ed033's Note - You can type in a url to a video/ image /web page and i'll see what i can do with it.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
24 Aug 2017 12:10:29
Thanks ed that will be good
I'm going to find the best ones then posts
You probably seen for yourself you have to watch 20 miss info and crap to get to one with real work and information .
Plus I am guilty of clicking on click bait lol.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11541Talk Sense

22 Aug 2017 01:10:26
As always enjoy
The conversation hsf, ed and others.

A bee apparently can't fly as a bee defies gravity
There is one law in our world
Either You know Or you don't know!
It's all about resonance

Inside a bee there is a cavity that is hollow
When he beats his wings it resonates
What In turn helps it defy (gravity)
What mainstream science tells you this
Before you try to work things out.

We live in a mad world run and controlled by even more mad persons.

southampton87
22 Aug 2017 13:48:33
Is the key to beating what we are told is gravity,
chitin.
{Ed033's Note - What does "chitin" mean?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 15:20:51
It's what insects are made from Ed
A Russian scientist apparently attached beetles outta shell
To a board and it hovers.
{Ed033's Note - Ok thanks, So if you wanted to make anything hover and be indestructible, you would firstly attach chitin to it and then surround the whole thing with passports.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 15:58:42
Lol
Cheers for that ed
Sounds good ed
I'm going to get started.
I haven't looked into it to much
But it can be used to defy gravity
Propulsion would come from else where
But the frame would also have to be extra light
If u managed to tie this together
You could possibly
Have an anti gravity ship
Not sure about the indestructible bit lol.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, but with all the terrorists that are killed / blown up, their passports always appear somewhere close to them intact.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 16:44:25
Or they where theorising
IT may be possible to grow similar to human tissue
Or another option apparently
Would be to 3d scan and print this pattern and attach fibres.
{Ed033's Note - Yes 3D printers sound great. If i had one, i'd print out a 4D printer.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 17:17:45
Lol
Your passport would probably be indestructible ed,
But trust me if I see the t.v and they claim a building exploded in
Let's say Spain lol
And they also believe they have found a foot next to a passport with a picture of a wizard
And the name ED33 on it with a phone that is also funnily indestructible as well

I will be the first on this site to scream conspiracy lol.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 6 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11540Talk Sense

21 Aug 2017 23:21:28


hsf, I know what the text book says mate, but it don't add up.
And when I take a step back NASA is fake same as the Russian Japanese and Chinese space agencies
What model / theory are you working from i. e.
The sun is shooting through the galaxy and the planets following
Or the sun and the planets shooting through space in order
Because common sense tells us we can't do both
And what are you working this out by?

Because as far as I can see gravity is unproven best guess maybe, but solid without doubt proven no chance!
So by saying anything past this point is pointless.

To me the image looks like Stanley Kubrick working his magic from the grave
No matter what rip Stanley
But can I prove it no.
The fact the sun comes from one angle can give you the position of our planet and sun
But beside the fact .

If I drum up fake evidence I'm going to look at how science explains the workings.
Then put that working into the fake evidence
So that if a clever hsf popped up it would make sense .
But let's take it back to something like gravity
Without it your whole concept falls apart
But is it proven, No.

So from there your whole theory and what you have learned from space is bull and you couldn't argue the difference.
Because where you come from is false to begin with.
Have you seen the experiment with a extra long slinky
When held from a balcony
You would expect with the pull of gravity the hole thing when released would drop
Does it, no.

The bottom does not move while the top does. If gravity was in effect this would not happen. So as I said, I don't doubt your knowledge in space but I do doubt the theories you work by.
To come to a conclusion.
And what I asked was why do we not see the (dark side) of the moon.
Passing In front of our earth instead of cgi
As a computer generated image is not a real picture.
And thank you for letting me know what light pollution is.

 

{Ed033's Note - Some of those scientist types can't use their own brains and have to be told what to think by reading 'scientific' journals. The problem is that all the 'scientific' journals are controlled so you can't believe a single thing in them.
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 10:07:05
Yes ed33 exactly.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11539Talk Sense

21 Aug 2017 14:47:19
Hsf
So how is the side pictured got light on it
Surely the sun would have to be behind no?
And as you just put it's not the side facing earth.
Because where is the earth.

 

hsf
21 Aug 2017 15:42:15
The Moon is what is known as Tidal Locked, which means the same side of the Moon faces the Earth at all times. When the planet rotates and orbits the star, the "dark side" of the Moon will be lit up by the star at some point.

The picture was taken as the Moon's "dark side" started to face the star.

The picture wasn't taken from that far away, so the Earth would not be visible

As we all know, Space is not 2D - so we don't even know what angle this picture was taken at. But I'd imagine the Earth is behind the Moon, and given how close the picture looks to be, the Moon, the Earth is hidden.

I'm actually surprised you didn't mention the lack of stars in the picture, which is easily explained by the way. If you go out at night into a forest or somewhere with low levels of light pollution, take a picture of the sky with your flash on. No stars will appear in the photo. This is because the flash from the camera is more intense than the points of light in the sky and drowns them out.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
22 Aug 2017 01:28:11
Why does the sun gravity that is stronger than ours
Not steal our sun?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9546Talk Sense

21 Aug 2017 11:49:05
Probably a little much at once, but I sat and watched these 3 videos in 2 days, all 9 hours.

Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson on the Joe Rogan Experience
In these videos, they discuss Egypt, Gobekli Tepe, The Younger Dryas and a global flood 12,800 years ago.



youtube.com/watch?v=0H5LCLljJho

This one also includes a 3rd guest - Michael Shermer
youtube.com/watch?v=tFlAFo78xoQ

Fascinating stuff to listen too, especially the stuff on Gobekli Tepe and the Sphinx.
Is there a piece of human history that is genuinely missing?

 

{Ed033's Note - If people have seen the Planet of the Apes film with Charlton Heston as lead role, i interpret that film as the apes who are covering up the past (advanced humans, artefacts), is analogous to the Elite run Smithsonian Institute and others covering up our past (giants, hobbits, hominids, advanced humans, advanced artefacts, ETs?)
hsf
21 Aug 2017 13:01:03
I see what you're saying with that, it makes sense about the advanced humans.

I genuinely don't think it's about ET's or anything like that. I'm with Randall Carlson that a comet hit the earth during the Younger Dryas period and wiped out a huge amount of life. Possibly leading to lost knowledge and lost civilisations. There is an insane amount of evidence to suggest this happened, with the extinction of 80% of the mega mammals in North America, plus the Black Matt layer, the nano-diamonds and the lack of mega mammal skeletons above the black mat layer.

It's all very convincing stuff and I look forward to hearing more, especially as now mainstream archaeology is getting behind this theory and pumping money into it!

When you consider the Human race has been around in it's modern form for around 200,000 years, it seems very naive to assume that it took us 199,000 years to become technologically advanced, especially when you have megalithic structures like Gobekli Tepe the one under the sea near Italy that date back over 10,000 years.
{Ed033's Note - I hope you don't mind me not closing my mind off to anything ET I'm open to the possibility that the 'Cone Heads' for example being non human or ET.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
21 Aug 2017 15:07:38
Rogan sells out regularly.
He sold out for fame and to avoid being forced off youtube through censorship.
If u want an indication of what people believe, look how many people tuned into watch Eddie Bravo on the Rogan show two weeks ago compared to this show.

Apart from that these specialists tell you things we know nothing about. Ie they talk about the time the first comet hit it caused an ice age. Well this is apparently what happens when the sun gets blocked by the dirt and dust getting kicked up into the atmosphere.

Then they go on to say and about 1600 years later another comet hit to cause a massive rise in temperature. How about after the dust settles, the sun being able to peer back in, it would naturally start to melt the ice and in turn create clouds witch would then rain and then flood.

But a bigger question gets left unanswered. We are covered in water where did it come from? Because these same specialists try to say water was first brought to the planet by a comet. But these specialists also try to say the water has resided as well, meaning there was a lot more at one point. It's all best guesses.

We cannot get honest clear pictures of the deepest of our oceans or the deepest parts of space or even real full pictures of the earth or the moon that passes in front of our Earth. They can give false evidence all day though.

Humanity in the past most probably where massively advanced. We today just like to think we are. So I do hope there is hidden tech because at least we could then be seen to be advancing in space and seas as we like to believe we can.
{Ed033's Note - Yes southampton, it's a lot of guess work going on with Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson on this subject.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
hsf
21 Aug 2017 15:17:05
Ed, I'd love it to be ET's I really would. I'm open to the idea, I just don't think it's likely is all.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
21 Aug 2017 23:23:43
Sorry for not replying sooner
Yes that is what my opinion would be on these two.
ASwell ed
Thanks for replys.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11538Talk Sense

20 Aug 2017 17:52:21
Also what do people think of the Lunar wave and the other videos that claim to show a star through it.

 

hsf
21 Aug 2017 10:57:34
The lunar wave you are seeing is the Earth's atmosphere. It's turbulent air in the atmosphere caused by differences in temperature.

That's the official explanation, but who knows?
{Ed033's Note - Be interesting to crowd fund John Lenard Walson who has a novel technique to video the moon up close live to see whether he can find the 'Lunar Wave'.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
21 Aug 2017 23:52:24
Well killed any fun to be had there aye hsf
Lol
Yes ed33
It would be good to see.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11537Talk Sense

20 Aug 2017 17:50:58
What do people think about the far side of the moon
Ie every space agency refuses to show it
Like a Japanese and Russian clips of the moon passing in front of earth .
I know it's clearly cgi with the moon just blotted out.
But why we not able to be shown or see this.

 

hsf
21 Aug 2017 10:58:45
This is not the far side, no?

{Ed033's Note - This could be a dark side of the moon version of the fake 'blue marble'.
As NASA lies about almost everything, it's most likely not a real image of the far side.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
hsf
21 Aug 2017 13:04:21
Well, one thing is for sure, it's definitely not the side facing Earth.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.