11 Aug 2017 16:34:47
Just to continue our discussion on Sitchin and the 9th/10th planet.
The very idea that a species could survive in an orbit around the sun of 3600 years is almost impossible. For a start, life would only have a very, very short period to evolve, probably 500 years at a time, if not less. Plus this planet goes through the kuiper belt. Which is an enormous asteroid belt at the edge of our solar system.
Now to put it into context, there is a thing called the "Taurid meteor stream" which the Earth passes through twice a year (12 days each time) . Each time we pass through it, we have "meteor showers" which are fun to watch, but every now and then, something bigger comes into our atmosphere.
in 1908 a 100 meter wide Taurid asteroid exploded 3 miles above the surface of the Earth and flattened 80 million tree's in Siberia.
Imagine going through a 2 billion mile wide belt, which would take 100 years to pass through, it's going to get smashed to bits and life would never be able to grab a foothold, let alone defend its self from asteroid strikes.
Additionally, the planet will be frozen solid for the large majority of its orbit, as it allegedly stretches as far as 50 Astronomical Units away, which is 93,000,000*50 in miles. That's 4.6 billion miles away. To put it into context, Pluto is 3 billion miles away and frozen solid.
{Ed033's Note - I'm not a Nibiru believer. I'll believe it when i see it, but the Annunaki did not have to evolve on Niburu, but travelled there and they could live in underground facilities inside Nibiru.
11 Aug 2017 19:00:27
To be honest I don't know what to believe in regards to this.
I just listen to bits here and there and think is it possible .
I think nibiru is 1 planet of a few that is part of a mini system with its own dwarf start that is a twin to our own sun,
As 70% of stars out there are supposed to be binary.
So it is possible if 70% of systems out there in my eyes that this planet is there
Not to mention rt have openly talked about a Planet X that has the same trajectory as what sitchen spoke of.
But do I believe it, don't have a clue
But theoretically let's say some sort of advanced being on there own planet worked out how to heat a planet that has it own mini star just enough, by spraying a certain mixture in there own atmosphere that would allow this. could possibly support a life .
But again who could know .
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
11 Aug 2017 19:03:34
Extinction event could be just the powers at be wipe us out for knowing too much.
Then when we go though "evolution" again and a controlling elite help us find a story of how something fire like hit earth.
And killed us lol.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
11 Aug 2017 19:06:06
Sorry but a 50,000 megaton asteroid hitting a planet of any size, is not going to be survivable in any circumstance. Even if Nibiru was just an outpost, it would not be able to sustain anything on it, from buildings to life, nothing would be able to withstand the impacts.
All you have to do is look at the Proto-Earth simulation to get an idea of what would happen.
You also have to consider with any article or paper detailing intelligent life - the Fermi Paradox.
In my personal opinion, I believe we are not alone, but I don't think there are many if any at all that have reached our level of sophistication and intelligence. If they have reached our level or surpassed it, then the likelihood is they blew themselves up, assuming we as a species are anything to go by.
I can get on board some of Sitchins stuff, but this is just too flawed for me to consider.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
11 Aug 2017 21:05:42
Come on Southampton87, you're just speculating. If you put some evidence forward of what you're saying then it becomes credible.
There is no evidence as of yet to suggest we're in a binary star system. There are many theories, but very little evidence to suggest it. If I'm wrong, then I'm happy to admit it, but we would have found the Suns "evil twin" as it was coined back in the day, it would actually be one of the brightest stars in the sky, irrespective of it's luminosty and size. The only time it would be exceptionally hard to find with modern telescopes, is if it's a Brown Dwarf or a Black Dwarf (it takes about a billion or more years to happen after a supernova/ hypernova, so the theory suggests) . And we don't believe we've found any of those yet.
{Ed033's Note - If as the theory goes that 70% of stars are in a binary system, then i think you can speculate that it is possible our Sun is part of a binary system.
The theory on our Sun's twin is that the other Sun orbits our Sun every 24,000-26,000 years i.e. the precessional long count number, with the twin sun speculated to be Sirius A i think or Sirius B, which is one of the brightest stars.
If you search for Sirius twin of our Sun, lots of results come up to look at for possible evidence.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
11 Aug 2017 21:28:39
Yes hsf there are plenty of holes in sitchin theory,
And I hear what u say.
Good post.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
