Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
03 Aug 2016 15:29:52 Richard D. Hall has an update video on the theory that the Mars Rovers are/ were never on planet Mars, never left Earth and are/ were roaming around on uninhabited parts of Earth.
03 Aug 2016 17:43:36 Pretty good series of videos that. Richard looks like a cross between Nicolas Cage and Jonathon Ross but with a northern English accent.
I did feel that some of this was nit-picking at times. They were taking images of blurry rocks and calling them fossils with no real evidence, not saying they are wrong but you can't make a definitive statement like that on something so subjective.
I didn't change my opinion after watching the video series, I still feel the rovers are on Mars, but it did leave me with a few questions. A few points are the apparent faster than light radio transmissions, the pretty obvious photo shopped images (such as the sand dune) and the maths behind the landing.
03 Aug 2016 22:39:26 I haven't watched this one yet but I've seen several other videos that clearly show insects buzzing about, so if that's really Mars why aren't they telling us they've found life there. Because it isn't and they haven't.
04 Aug 2016 00:14:48 People all over Europe have been protesting about the current situation for a while now and it hardly ever gets mentioned on msm, I wonder why?
02 Aug 2016 20:49:50 Just to open a discussion, any flat earthers on the site. If so what swings it for you?
{Ed033's Note - Are you sure the recent 'flat earth' info floating around is not another Pentagon/government agency psy-op to see just how many people might take the bait?
03 Aug 2016 15:56:55 Wot the same curve we are to small to see And cannot prove Just a fake nasa picture to go by? How did they get past the van Allen belt? They say it a problem now and no man has travelled past Ever So how did they go to the moon I don't think personally we are on a flat plane But I would be happy to say it is Drastically different to what they tell us But to the original poster Sea level is a good one Also a 1000 years old map apparently just found NATO have the flat earth map as the emblem And all navy use the flat earth map to navigate As we all know see and can prove Water surface does not bend But we are on a globe and it's coverd in 2/ 3 water Try get water to stick on a spinning ball yourself As for gravity The only people speaking about being able to prove its actually real are cern Space travel is fake.
{Ed001's Note - gravity comes from mass so a spinning ball will not work.}
03 Aug 2016 16:20:02 If the Earth is flat, then why are all the other planets which I have viewed personally via the £1300 telescope that I have, all spherical in shape but the Earth be flat?
I'm already wanting you to say Earth is special, PLEASE SAY IT!
02 Aug 2016 18:33:58 Does any of you good people know of any vendor of mimosa hostilis inner root bark in the uk. It seem as if there has been a clamp down! I can't find any evidence of this been made illegal but the trusted vendors have stopped selling this. Just another example of complete control. It's bloody bark for god sake.
30 Jul 2016 13:09:46 I have been reading a lot about Bob Lazar (claims to have worked in S4 near area 51) and I am convinced he is the real deal. The guy built a particle accelerator in his back garden.
No one has ever been able to debunk this guy. Many have tried, but all have failed.
In this video, Lazar talks about the Alien craft he worked on; the Alien propulsion system and how it works; the elements used; and he talks about the beings themselves.
There is a lot of science in this video, although Lazar use language and descriptions that make it easy to understand what he is explaining.
30 Jul 2016 13:49:13 Just an interesting side note Tuor80 regarding the fuel for the anti gravity propulsion system commonly known as "element 115". Bob disclosed this info and people like you say tried to debunk him as the security at S4 is as tight as a midges a*se and he couldn't get some of it out. I believe the element does exist and the new name for it is Ununpentium. Its a super heavy element like bob says and it was reproduced by a U. S / Russian science team. Also on this subject, I believe anti gravity saucers manipulate the natural magnetism of the planet to pull off some of they crazy mid air maneuvers. And are also incapable of travelling through space as the distance between planets is too great and in the vast empty space there is no magnetism to pull or push the craft as soon as it is far enough away from the planet it would be dead in the water so to speak. Just my opinion but I would recommend researching magnetism as I believe that is the real most logical explanation as to how these craft work. Or. The UFOs don't come from space but alternate dimensions.
30 Jul 2016 20:36:44 Im sure jim morrisons dad was high up in the military.
{Ed033's Note - Yes Jim Morrisons dad was an admiral, can't get much higher and you can't get anywhere near admiral in the Navy unless you're classed as 'Royalty', meaning being within the 1% of the special bloodline (not sure how this is calculated though).
30 Jul 2016 10:14:19 I am not a fan of Donald Trump, I think the man could be dangerous but it is far, far too convenient that HC's emails have apparently been hacked by the 'Russians' after he suggested they do it. I mean what happened to good old fashioned cloak and dagger espionage, like our good old friend Kim? :p.
30 Jul 2016 12:52:36 I totally agree, he is more than likely going to be dangerous with power and influence. I know Trump is no idiot however I find him real funny. Well at least until lives are lost. Here's the truth its quite funny.
30 Jul 2016 13:36:54 I totally agree, I had a conversation with Frankie on Twitter about being aware of the quiet person in a fight with Trump. Whilst he runs his mouth off, he is probably only saying what he truly believes and wants to do, being as honest as he possibly can. Clinton on the other hand is trouble with a capital T.
30 Jul 2016 01:14:19 one of the best thoughts I have gained from watching david icke's podcasts is when a situation occurs the number 1 question has to be who benefits? he seems to know exactly what we are in for if as expected Hilary Clinton becomes elected president of the usa, we cannot say we have not been warned.
30 Jul 2016 01:09:46 fox news, fair and balanced! what a joke that is, when 1 person owns a news channel and uses it to broadcast totally biased news, real journalism and democracy dies a death which harms us all, Murdoch is just pure evil and one of the major players in the hidden hand agenda.
27 Jul 2016 17:26:22 Ed033 if I may ask you a question relating to something you said in an earlier post. You said in a reply to TTTS:
"fact that the main agenda is to ruin the whole Earth. "
"They also have an agenda (over the long term) to remove all natural life forms from the land and introduce a few synthetic/ artificial life forms. Humans will be replaced with a 'better' synthetic/ artificial slave unit "
My question is in your opinion, what the whole point of ruining the Earth is. It's the one thing I just can't get my head around, it makes little to no sense whatever way I look at it.
I mean losing all natural life forms on the Earth would in effect make the Earth become like Mars or Venus, meaning it's uninhabitable for life as we know it.
{Ed033's Note - Forget about thinking in sane terms, you're dealing with a negative agenda. It could be as simple as the theory that they have this crazy idea that they want to destroy God and if everything that was natural in the universe was destroyed and only synthetic / artificial stuff was around, in their minds, that would destroy God. Therefore, in their minds, if they can destroy all natural life on Earth, then they've done well.
However, there are other theories; The first thing you have to realise is that there is/are 1 or more groups who think they are the rightful rulers of Earth and that they see humans as their slave units. But they would like 'better' slave units. Regardless of the NASA war document being real or not, from their perspective, humans are too large, too soft, too weak and use up too many resources. Therefore humans being changed into a synthetic/ artificial slave unit sounds likely.
If you look into it, it appears that the natural life forms in the oceans are being wiped out due to fukushima radiation and other human technologies such as genetically modified organisms and harmful to life substances/frequencies in the oceans.
It also appears that natural life forms on land are also being wiped out by human technologies such as radiation, high altitude spraying, genetically modified organisms and harmful to life substances/frequencies being used.
This is deliberate, so what other explanation would anyone come to other than the main agenda is to ruin the whole Earth?
27 Jul 2016 19:17:38 It stands to logic! People only get one life so to a sociopath why would what happens after your dead matter to much. It's like the hypothetical question "if you had 24hrs left on earth"
The controllers could be like the tv series wayward pines.
27 Jul 2016 18:41:12 Ed033 have you just taken an acid tab?
{Ed033's Note - no, we're back to the fact that this site is too advanced for you as you have no clue about fukushima radiation, high altitude spraying, genetically modified organisms and harmful to life substances/frequencies being used.
27 Jul 2016 21:36:54 But this is my problem Ed, I can see the logic behind most of the other things that have been said here, by yourself or some of the posters, but this one is just too insane. It's like a bit added on to the end of a speech, similar to "believe in God or go to Hell" like some religious speakers say.
{Ed033's Note - we're back to the fact that this site is too advanced for you as you have no clue about fukushima radiation, high altitude spraying, genetically modified organisms and harmful to life substances/frequencies being used.
28 Jul 2016 02:47:14 I think they're ruining the earth to rebuild again with their own rules. There is too many people now for them to rule like they would want to without a backlash.
26 Jul 2016 19:32:47 Is there a chance that the increase in attacks is potentially a way to scare us into staying in Europe I.e. we are stronger together just been noticeable the increase since the referendum.
26 Jul 2016 20:57:23 Seeing attacks on a daily basis why would anyone think it could be avoided just by Britain remaining in a bankrupt collapsing project.
26 Jul 2016 21:07:47 I can't see that to be honest, everyone I've spoken to about the goings on are saying the sooner the government tell the Eu to shove the single market and take back complete control of who we let enter the country the happier they will be.
They were warned about the consequences of uncontrolled migration, but they chose to ignore those concerns, this will only go so far before the indigenous populations of the affected countries in Europe start a backlash. Scary times ahead.
26 Jul 2016 22:09:43 that's my point Jimmy, play the fear card so when the government turn around and say we are better together due to security the majority won't argue and the chance to get out of the EU for good.
Maybe it isn't the direct reason for these attacks but I can see it being used to attempt us to re-think the decision.
26 Jul 2016 23:08:20 A lot will be to do with elections across the waters French German and American elections As well as distract people from seeing the troubles Between USA China Russia and to distract from the economy And also not to forget the long goal of more security/ control China economy is in trouble Russia economy is in trouble partly becuase of sanctions And America are so far in debt they need a earner lol It's a bit like monopoly With all players applying different tatics And they have found a nice subject a lot of people will believe when they are told
Uk and USA are backing isil This was proven the other day when uk cried Russia bombed a camp SAS where on the day before One problem though it was a Isis camp Russia hit And these are supposedly doing attacks across Europe Hhmmmmm!
25 Jul 2016 13:49:46 Ed, any idea if it is true what Putin said about the queen being a "shapeshifter" and that he saw it in person, and she did it as a warning to him.
If he has said this then I don't know what to make of him.
Never believed in this whole Lizard overlord nonsense to be honest.
{Ed033's Note - It's more likely that they are trying to make out that Putin is a nutter. i think they have called Putin a racist and put out other negative stuff about him before but nothing has stuck as yet.
25 Jul 2016 16:44:18 His psychological profile would make interesting reading. However I believe that file disappeared long ago. He does have certain sociopathic or psychopathic tendencies but I believe the majority of world leaders do as well.
Racist? He's a Russian patriot, wants a strong Russia. Racist, possibly. As I've said before the majority or Russians look down on non Russians. Look at the soviet era of russification policies. Then look at countries like America. Fine ones to cry racism.
Putin had his issues. But if people are going to launch smear campaigns. Well what's that English saying about people in glass houses.
25 Jul 2016 20:36:39 Just type in Obama shakes Putin's hand Obama cannot look at Putin Two words GUTLESS and GUILTY Same Cameron no doubt May Only other leader in spotlights at the min That had the same type bottle Is Erdogan another one the media jumps on Funny though Putin is probably familiar with the rhyme Sticks and stones lol Every time I see Putin he stands proud and has honest straight up responses Shame the rest don't watch and learn Just constantly back stab and cry.
{Ed033's Note - The rest of the 'leaders' have to do as they're told and go along with the ridiculous negative agenda.
25 Jul 2016 21:01:14 Yes i'd say everyone has prejudices. Its a rare person that doesn't.
Yes the thing with Putin is he's always had a certain strength of character. All the west can do is to try to poison his image. Wont work elsewhere as Putin controls Russian media and most people elsewhere don't listen to America as much.
