Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #10312Talk Sense

20 Jul 2013 10:24:17
not sure if this has been on here before, but I found it very interesting, apparently according to Paul Hellyer, ex-Minister of Canadian National Defence, there are 4 known species of ET on Earth, 2 of which are working with the Americans supposedly,

grover

 

Not Registered
If its true what he says, then we can assume that 50% of the aliens visiting earth are hostile (why else would they be in cahoots with the USA?) and the other 50% don't care about the rest of the planet, otherwise they would intervene to stop the USA marching us all towards a NWO.
Personally I think its disinfo, for what reason I don't know, maybe Bluebeam or something similar.

MrTrotskysGhost
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Hey fellas, first time poster to conspiracy talk. lots of fascinating stuff on here. this clip keeps crashing on me and when I look for vids on other sights they invariably have been removed or are otherwise unaccessible but before jumping to the "those in the know don't want you to know" conclusion, i'd like some links, if available, to other sites so I can process the info for myself.

Cheers. DB
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Clearly Paul Hellyer is a very learned and decent man. At his age, he has nothing to lose by speaking his mind publicly. But his comment that 'there is no country on earth powerful enough to protect it's citizens from fanatical hate, as we learned from the Boston Marathon', suggests that be believes the official (Boston) story. He wants us believe in the possibility that there are four different species of aliens on earth, but roll over on Boston and accept the official story?

If you're going to make such a bold claim in such a public forum as that, then at least hang your hat on it. Don't mumble vaguely for nine minutes, so your critics can eat you alive or even worse just laugh at you. Even if he is right his delivery is so bad it makes him look like a silly old man. Sorry, he's sincere and likeable, but utterly unconvincing even to a sceptic like me. Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Not being a bible basher, just airing my piece! Genesis talks of the watchers, who are fallen angels who followed Lucifer into the realm of earth to corrupt Gods creation, man.

The nephillim were the offspring of their relationship with humans. Its all in genesis! The bible says they are liars and want 2 destroy mankind, planting hatred, and chaos across the races etc.

The fact that the USA are in cahoots with 2 and more than likely China and Russia, are in cahoots with the others speaks volumes.

American literature, iconography is littered with satanic symbols! Religious or not, the story is compelling and we are headed towards, day of disclosure.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9736Talk Sense

20 Jul 2013 10:42:14
Hi I have just finished reading Inferno by Dan Brown and would like to hear the thoughts of anybody else who has read it, The plot is about population control, it had lots of facts about our growth over the years like did u know that it took from start of time until the start 20th century for our population to reach 1 billion and in 113 years later despite 2 world wars our population is pushing 9 billion that's that's a growth of 7 1/2-8 billion in 113 year period, that book has a great twist at the end and would like to hear ppls opinions on the conclusion of the book and if they believe it will be a the best way of population control?

 

Joe
Didn't enjoy the book in terms of entertainment, but as you said it raised some interesting points.

I found some of the facts interesting, and enjoyed the bit about geometric progression, but his numbers for current population and projected global population aren't consistent with official UN figures (not saying they're correct either, just that they don't match).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2013/jun/13/nigeria-larger-population-us-2050

The ending did, as you say have a bit of a twist. But I don't think it's too realistic. War would be a far more realistic occurrence to drastically reduce global population. Just my opinion though!
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9868Talk Sense

19 Jul 2013 21:11:31
Hi guys, I've not been on the page for a while but I've come across an interesting topic on the Internet, what do you think of John Titor, the alleged time traveller from 2036, who made a number of predictions on an Internet forum, most of which haven't happened but some of his predictions, such as the escalating climax in the Middle East have come true. Any opinions?

 

{Ed033's Note - The John Titor saga is years old now and there has never been a way to tell if he was a fake or not.
Not Registered
Never been convinced Titor is real. Not sure my last post was real either since it disappeared lol :)

Ryan
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11442Talk Sense

19 Jul 2013 00:35:22
How is everybody I've not been on here in a while but I got sent an amusing text.

My mate suffers from that disease which makes him allergic to facts.

Religion.

 

Not Registered
Brilliant!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9431Talk Sense

18 Jul 2013 10:58:07
Hi guys, been away 4 a bit, but i'm back with a bang!

So in liue of the David Kelly case being scrutinized by experts. (check daily mail) and its 10 year anniversary. I got to thinking why are the case files subject 2 a time lock of 70 years? Why was it anjudge who ruled his death suicide as opposed 2 an expert?

After doing some reading up on the subject, I came across a similar piece about the late John Smith. This guy was a classic "old labourite". isn't it funny how if he got into power "new labour" would not have got a sniff? I mean let's face it Blair and his new labour peddled the one world, social dumbing down and zionist agenda. Funnier still his wife has a certain freemason in her family tree, a one John Wilkes Booth. if u know how 2 look u can see so many smoking guns.

 

Not Registered
Cases are time locked to ensure all involved are dead when the case reopens.

How many corpses do you see in court?

Jimi 88
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Yes its called sweeping it under the carpet
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Garbo
Or burying the truth
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I only live a few miles away from where Dr Kelly was killed. this is a complete cover up.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10311Talk Sense

17 Jul 2013 22:48:38
I've just been watching a programme on C4 called 'Skint' which, as you've probably guessed, is about the poor and unemployed in England. As a result of being jobless, quite a few were taking drugs.

This got me thinking. Will Governments ever totally eradicate drugs? Do they even want to?

I think that Governments want to be seen to be coming down hard on dealers/ cartels etc. but actually I think it's in their best interests that the more vulnerable in society have access to it. How will the masses rise up if they're drugged up or still reeling from the effects of drug use?

That's my 2 pennies worth, would be interesting to see what you guys think.

ConspiracyKen

 

frankyscouser
If it is making them money they are going to roll with it, I assume you are talking about illegal drugs?but even legal drugs like alcohol suit there purpose, sell it cheap enough in supermarkets that in turn kills of the pubs which was a social meeting for everyone, ten years down the line pubs are dead, people do not mix as much because it is cheaper to drink at home and now they say we all drink way to much and it is bad for everyone, so they raise the prices.
Agree · 7 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Ever wondered why major drug seizure are mainly pot and anything harder in small quantities, in afghanistan the US wanted to spray poppy fields, the british said no won't allow it think of the poor farmer.

What does that tell you. the drug war is a sham designed to make the more gullible think everyone around them is a junkie who will rob them blind
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #1944Talk Sense

17 Jul 2013 19:53:19
2ND Person Of Interest Spotted On Roof Of The Lenox Hotel Boston

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKhH0VnK7aQ

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10310Talk Sense

17 Jul 2013 13:38:28
There are now weather hotlines and twitter feeds offering tips on how to deal with the hot weather! Are there really people so thick that they don't know when they are too hot? Or that they should drink when they are thirsty? What next? A warning in December not to go out in shorts and a tee shirt as it might be cold?

 

Not Registered
18 Jul 2013 19:27:47
Wouldn't work in Newcastle :-)
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10309Talk Sense

17 Jul 2013 11:27:5417 Jul 2013 11:24:03
Here's a few ideas for a poll, Ed.

Do we live in a Democracy?

Should we abolish the monarchy?

Do politicians care about the poor?

Should we have a constitution?



Btw I'd vote, No, Yes, No and Yes. Thoughts anyone?

MrTrotskysGhost  

 

{Ed033's Note - The problem with the word 'Democracy' is our definition is different from the controller's definition. So from their point of view, they may think we're in or almost in a Democracy (their definition being something like, 'we say, the people do')
frankyscouser
We pay lips service called a democracy.
abolish no we should try them for treason and murders.
have politicians ever cared genuinely about the poor?
a constitution only works if you have trustworthy people to implement it.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
We live in a pseudo democracy. Democracy just means mob rule

abolish the monarchy. That is all

Politicians are, in general, self serving liars. The desire to be one should ban you from ever being one.

Constitution is a waste of time. Rules are made to be bent, broken and manipulated, it would seem.

Jimi 88
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
No. no. no and no
the monarchy own the US, the us is just a registered company, as is the UK.

There is no democracy but with pc and buzzwords, people believe we are democratic.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10308Talk Sense

17 Jul 2013 10:18:42
A question for all that post on this site really including the Eds! Do you get a sense of fear when writing a post about certain topics? Just lately freedom of speech has somehow been removed and people arrested and some jailed for giving their opinion on the matter! Just got me thinking that maybe these sites are monitored and what we post is recorded! Or is that me being paranoid?

RR!

 

{Ed033's Note - It's all about control and the elitists use what they call 'Weapons' against us. One of the most devastating 'Weapon' is Political Correctness. Virtually everyone has been brainwashed by it and think it's a good idea.

Obviously some people aren't brainwashed by the 'Weapons' and because when we communicate with each other, we might learn stuff from each other, this has to be controlled so even though they have no lawful authority to stop free speech as we have an unalienable right to free speech, they are going to force a control on speech and the brainwashed will go along with it using certain examples that they have seen or heard on the mainstream media (whether real or fake) to justify controls on speech.

What we have in law is slander, whereby someone who thinks they have been slandered can seek remedy but a fictional entity such as government/state/crown has no lawful authority to dictate to us what is and what is not acceptable to say.
frankyscouser
RR, fear no, but my eyes are wide open to the fact we are all getting monitored either on these types of websites and social network sites, it is only our opinion on touchy subjects but the way they are making new laws or not even using the law to detain people for their beliefs then I can see the people getting charged for treason in twenty years for what was once called freedom of speech.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
I forgot to mention what edd said about Political Correctness now for the last few years I have been watching big brother and people should watch it, not for the housemates who want instant fame and will do anything to get there but how BB manipulates a certain person they do not like or are bored of, what BB are doing is exactly what the media are doing to us all everyday, now getting back to the Political Correctness angle on Tuesday before the show started it said some viewers might find these scenes distressing, I am thinking could have been a big fight or someone has lost the plot or a sexual attack, then it turns out they manipulate the situation by putting a black guy who has a bird and the irish bird who fancy each other feed them and ply them with plenty of booze, the black boxer guy who has had problems and is not a drinker, throw that all in the mix with a model who wants fame and he gets accused of practically assault after a play fight, now to me this has been blown up out of all proportion, do I think the black guy could have handled it better? absolutely but to me this is the media telling us what is and not acceptable.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Garbo
I don’t watch BB but I did read about that incident and to be honest Franky, the Media don’t have to point that out, to me it was pretty inappropriate. I do get your point on how producers of the show can manipulate who they do and don’t like and therefore make good people seem bad. It gets ratings.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
I agree mate he should not have done it but if they are playing by those certain rules then it has to be fair all round.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Political correctness has blurred the lines between freedom of speech and slander IMO. When I think of something I'm about to say, I never know if it's genuinely insulting, politically incorrect or whether I have the right to say what I feel. Poor example, but if anyone has been watching coronation street, you'll know that you can't say the slightest adverse phrase for fear of being called racist/ homophobic/ xenophobic etc.!

ConspiracyKen
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9008Talk Sense

16 Jul 2013 22:28:12
a good documentary on 7/7 terror attacks, out of interest edd what's your view on tony farrell?

 

{Ed033's Note - I think tony farrell is a top guy. He stuck to his principles rather than going along to get along
frankyscouser
That's the impression I got about him but you hear so many rumors about dis info about certain people it spins your head.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10307Talk Sense

16 Jul 2013 12:41:08
Is anyone really surprised that Prince Charles pays less tax than his servants? The fact that this parasitic waste of space has servants is bad enough. With news that the Queen is to receive a substantial increase in her govt granted money will people finally wake up? This family are at the very pinnacle of the illuminati pyramid. They care nothing for the people of this country. We are worker ants to them.

Now they have the posh boys on board in parliament things have gotten easier for them. This country is heading down the neo con route that the USA are pursuing. God help us all when this new baby is born. Once again we will see thousands of sheeple waving flags and gushing about how wonderful the royals are. It's 2013 but the mindset of the majority is from the 16th century.

 

frankyscouser
A new law has been written that there will be no public records what the monarchy are getting off the tax players, to be honest it would take a lot to get rid of them, they would have to do something shocking or past history of them doing something shocking was made available plus there are millions of sheep who love them, would love to see there reaction when they find out that there beloved monarchy had more in common with Nazi ideologies.
Agree · 5 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Why are the Queen mothers records to be hidden from the public for 100 years? Might it be true the rumour that she struck a deal with the Nazi party to remain in place when Germany won the war? To ensure a smooth transition.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
You will find a lot of skeletons (pardon the pun) in the monarchy closet, from Nazism, pedophilia, child murders to princess diana murder, until there is a revolution or someone dishes the dirt and they advocate then it will be hidden in that same cupboard.
{Ed033's Note - This isn't the first time someone has put 'advocate' (publicly recommend or support) when they mean 'abdicate'.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Spelling not my strong point edd, if I never had spellchecker it would need tom hanks off the da vinci code to crack what I was saying.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.