Latest replies

Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 17:50
I must say, the thought of Eden hazard flashing his clamshell! has mentally scarred me ed.

SupaSub {Ed001's Note - I am sure you would love it!}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 17:44
Sounds intriguing ed, I will have to check it out.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - 4 gone so far.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 17:39
Obviously food sticks out, but I'm thinking seaside, greasy caff, the clamshell has thrown me a bit because it could be an ashtray.
If not more clues,.......I should get out more.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - you got it first off mate. Sorry today's had to be put on hold because the day time was so busy dealing with the Liverpool FC edition of the Apprentice.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 15:10
It looks like 8 families controll world finance, they are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome. If you controll finance, then you controll the world. I think the various royal families rule by proxy, but are deeply linked with a number of these families. I also think Prince Phillip holds a lot of power in elite circles. If you look at the Bilderberg meetings, wikipedia lists people who have attended down the years, it makes some interesting reading.........

Matt_RFC
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 10:57
Big banking families , religious institutions and huge corporate interests ....i would say a group of about 100 people run this planet !
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 01:57
Will do would like to get more "in the know" until then your friend ..

red blancmone
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 01:50
Awsome site out of stronger's off to bed,back to work,more strongers after work good site.speak tomorrow nite.

red blancmonge {Ed001's Note - night mate, enjoy your shut eye.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 01:42
Ther is no united in any shape word or form in my normal/liquified head.LFC is all i recognize hence red blancmonge.Well done 3 refrences is 3 more than is on myjob application ho ho ho..

red you kno the rest {Ed001's Note - there are a few well plaiced references to the topic at hand on the Liverpool site too. Let me know if you bring your head back down from Mars and the Milky Way and figure out today's topic.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 01:28
"red blancmonge"hence where it came from..read the blogs sober early moning,go to work work hard lol till night time ,come home from work have a few cans of the well earned variety ie "stronbow"read some more.Head is like a pink jelly,lfc,more cans you get the picture.. love it. {Ed001's Note - mine feels like a jelly tonight, orange one I think, though 003 would prefer it to be tangerine. I managed to squeeze in 3 references to our chosen topic on one post on United's rumours today, and I am sat here all proud of myself until Ed003 goes and butters it.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 00:48
Hey eds you must be nuts to be up as late as myself"as i giggle profoundly" but i would love to hear your explanation honest i love a good chuckle.Cheers awsome site...


red blancmonge {Ed001's Note - it would take me hours to explain, and it would still make no sense, in fact it makes no sense to me but I have been giggling about it for a while now. I think I must need sleep!}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 00:38
Hi ed001.Please explain i don't think your "nuts"honest"lol.I thought my signature is quite unique. {Ed001's Note - oh it's just something we were discussing on our editor's widget and well your name is very appropriate. We decided on a little something to keep ourselves amused, we are going to change swear words and try to slip in words in our answers related to our subject of the day. Ed003 is going to see if he can figure out what the subject is while he is at work.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 00:17
Ok.Here we go there is deffo an "alien invasion",our king kenny dalglish has been taken over by another realm from manchester and he's hell bent on killin liverpool football club.Please help us.HA HA.
Read discussion
Reply · · 12 Apr 2012 00:17
Last post..sorry forgot my alias.

red blancmonge. {Ed001's Note - blancmange? You don't know just how appropriate your name is right now! You would think I was nuts if I explained though.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 21:18
The other people who give speeches really mean what they say. Like the pilot who was in this morning a few years ago. He also appeared on UFO hunters.

{Ed033's Note - Yes most other people who give speeches/presentations on the UFO subject are genuine but Nick Pope is an obvious disinfo / controlled opposition agent
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 18:21
Lol, it was only a suggestion ed! =)

JK92 {Ed001's Note - it is a good one too.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 17:24
Ive had problems posting on a few occasions but that is due to my virgin media internet p1ssing about.

ED, why doesn't the guy just email you the post through the "contact us" and you put it up for him?

JK92 {Ed001's Note - I don't know, you would have to ask him that!}
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 17:24
The most significant fact of wtc7 is the fact that it falls at freefall speed into its own footprint. If one part was weakened it would have started to fall but its speed would be slowed down by actually hitting itself, this building was pulverised by explosives, to come down so fast it actuall had to be blown out of its own way. What about the interview where Silverstein said "We decided to pull it" you cant just decide to pull a building down so perfectly, what an person I hope he chokes on his dirty insurance money, come to think of it who paid him that money ? Anyone know, were they in on it ? It was probably down the line backed by the Fed's worthless printing machine synicate

Matt_RFC
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 15:08
Your missing my point and maybe I'm not explaining my clearly.
The convential laws of physics as you and I know it, apply to what you are saying, but there is black tech out there I am sure that confounds the convential laws as we see it.
We can not say for instance that it was not HARRP that destroyed the towers. We can not say that some sort of death ray ala Independence Day caused the implosion.
All we are certain of is there were flames inside and it imploded.
So I actually agree with you about the fire but I'm saying that there COULD be an unconventional act not following the laws as we perceive them whereby a fire could do that type of damage. That's all.
Yeah and with the Pentagon that side of the building was empty due to 'refurbishment'. It is also a legal requirement in the US for fighters to be scrambled to intercept if a commercial airliner veers significantly off its flight path. This only happened after the 3rd aircraft crashed.
NoneTheWiser
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 14:46
Got one of them calls , indian man said his name was nigel and works for microsoft , I told him , that his name was not nigel , and to f$ck off , they never called back .
redforever
Read discussion
Reply · · 11 Apr 2012 12:24
If you stack some bricks in a twoer structure and hit it from the top the top will fall over and leave maybe half still remaining.

But if you hit it from the bottom then the whole thing will collapse its quite simple.

Basically I think it was said they intended to make the planes strike the bottom but the turning circles wouldnt allow it.So they struck the top instead therfore making the whole thing questionable.

Heat rises how can a fire at the top of a building weaken the bottom structurally it has no chance plus the fire needs alot of fuel ( supposedly jet fuel ) was the case but it has been proven this would have been more of a flash flame so your guess is as good as mine.
They stated in the official reports that something suspect went on this was done by independent investigators who basically debunked the whole thing as ludicrous.I mean I am not arguing with your mate like I said anything is possible but if you watch the video the planes did not damage the building that much really at all and the fires wouldnt have bought it down on itself and it collapsed in 8 sec if you dropped a penny of the top it would be around that time.
Ochams razer says that the simplest answer is usually the right one well add all the facts together that say it shouldnt have happened like that (ie loads more than written here ) to this Aplane flys into a building flown by terrorists and the buildings collapse because of the fires created.

That is all you or anyone has to go on that we see a plane go into a building we are told by others it was terrorists we are told by others how it happened would you believe them.

On another note if you still dont believe then check out the farsical cock ups they made over the pentagon one haha they used the wrong engine parts for starters when they scattered them over the area well I say scattered I mean the only thing left of the ENTIRE plane when it went into the side of the building was one engine and it was DEFINITELY not from the plane chartered to crash.

Eds do you know of any good docs the one I watched I think was something like a fist full of dollars or something with money in it.

Red tinted glasses {Ed001's Note - I can't think of any off the top of my head, I have watched a fair few that made interesting points though, so they are around.}
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.