Latest replies

07 Mar 2020 16:46:31
The only thing I have been able to find so far is this:

"Human Beings Law and Legal Definition.

There are various definitions for a human being. Biologically, they are classified as hominids of the species Homo sapiens, which are a primate species of mammal with a highly developed brain. Humans have the highest brain to body mass ratio of all large animals. They have a life expectancy approaching 80 years old in wealthy nations, walk on two feet and have opposable thumbs. Skin color ranges from almost back to pale pinkish-white. Height and weight varies, depending on locality, historical factors, environmental, and cultural factors such as diet.

Human beings are characterized by the ability to speak. They have a high capacity for abstract thinking and are commonly thought to possess a spirit or soul which transcends the physical body. The spiritual aspect of human beings is often defined in terms of rituals and religion. Theories involving the definition of the beginning of human life, evolution, and creationism are hotly debated topics in the law. " - definitions. uslegal.com.

07 Mar 2020 16:29:27
It's often beguiling to think of how obvious some conspiracies are. From nasa's fakery to towers falling out of the sky in 2001. Its something that bugged me for years.

On the most obvious level it leads one to think - how stupid or brazen are our controllers? But on another level, as I intimated the other day some of us are meant to find these clues / anomalies, in my opinion. The hidden hand at work - looking to aid our understanding and evolution. One soul at a time. When you think of it in those terms the clear anomalies make more sense, even if the concept seems crazy at first.

07 Mar 2020 15:43:15
'Human' and 'human being' are not in BL7th. However, from that I looked up person.

'Person' - 1. A human being 2.An entity (such as a corporation) that is recognised by law as having the rights and duties of a human being. 3. The living body of a human being

'Artificial Person' - An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more or less as a human being. - also termed fictitious person; juristic person; legal person; moral person.

Pretty interesting.

07 Mar 2020 14:19:08
Guy comes out, says he's not a tinfoil hat/ conspiracy guy

dressed as yoda

almost wet myself.

07 Mar 2020 10:16:30
I understand that, Ed. I Should have made the post solely about 'Blacks Law dictionary' and left the 'strawman' bit out.

What I meant was that, I brought Blacks Law Dictionary because from the research I have done and from what I have been told, 'the law' use legalese to confuse. I. e. using words with a reverse meaning to what you would expect. (like the example I gave in the OP) .

I am just stating that I have, as of yet, not found any terms that twist their meaning in said book.

It is a big book so there is still time, but I was expecting to find a lot of things that when someone (the public) acknowledges a phrase from 'the law' they are unknowingly accepting a language they do not understand and this language may have twisted what they believed the sentence to mean. If that makes sense? .

I know my mind can come across as a bit idiosyncratic at times, but I have taken on board and understand what you were telling us with the 'birth certificated person'.

I guess I am a little disappointed not to find a more twisted legalese language.

07 Mar 2020 02:36:46
Dubay at his best.

Lol the nothingness explosion.
Made the nothingness universe.

07 Mar 2020 02:35:29
I found math boylan/ powerland had a good veiw in this nasa fakery.

06 Mar 2020 19:04:09
You would of thought with Nasa's multi billion dollar budget they would have hired someone with some decent photoshop skills. Surely they would expect a few to delve deeper and see the fakery?

Standard, you still here? how do you explain this? why photoshop any images of the Earth? Why not show us the raw images? what have they got to hide?

Oh and how's the 'prove all MSBS is truth' video coming along?

We all can't wait to see it. Expecting it soon as you said it was so easy.

06 Mar 2020 11:52:17
claimed by who Ed?

06 Mar 2020 11:54:56
If you cure cancer for the general public then we have overpopulation and the same if not more people would die anyway. Cancer is cruel but at least it is perceived as random so there is nowhere to complain to if it strikes.

05 Mar 2020 23:05:25
Is it just me that sees the fundamental inaccuracies in this whole palaver, so the who quote a death rate based on number of deaths divided by the number of cases . but what about the cases that have had no outcome? How can you include them in the statistic? It’s unknown

Added to that the number of cases that are so mild that they are never even reported as people don’t register their disease?

As I’m on the conspiracy site I’ll throw one out there. The whole world is making a bigger deal out of this than they should to justify increased taxes in the future? I can picture it now . we need to increase taxes by x so we can better prepare for future pandemics. Coronavirus killed x amount of people so we need research more and spend more to stop it happening again.

I’m one that believes that there is already a cure for cancer but pharmaceutical companies withhold it as they make more from bogus treatment than they would a magic pill / treatment that would cure it. Yes I’m a family guy fan but I think they got closer to the truth than most people would care to believe.

Charity’s are mostly a scam . how much does the ceo of oxfam earn a year again? What motivation do they have to remedy the underlying issue?

05 Mar 2020 22:10:19
I don’t know about bitchute, but thanks I’ll take a look. Need to find alternatives to YT.

05 Mar 2020 17:53:17
If you look at what man is currently doing to the plant and how we are destroying the ideal conditions on it, it is conceivable that we will sooner or later make it impossible to sustain human life, at which point we will die out. In time, a new breed of humanoids will probably emerge, wither able to cope with the new atmosphere or when earth has returned the atmosphere to what it was when mankind emerged. With this thought in mind it is not inconceivable that there were races that came before us and killed themselves off in similar fashion, with the planet naturally decomposing and recycling the 'evidence' long before we came along. I think we are not the first humanoid race to walk the planet and will certainly not be the last.

05 Mar 2020 19:05:30
I basically thought the 'strawman' was tied to legalese which is clearly not that case.

Thanks for the explanation. I agree with your opinion of the op video. I was just confused about the 'starwman'.

I did watch the video, was it CRow777?, where our origin is the divine spark of fertilisation. The Old Testament relating to the womb, waters and the boat (ark) . Then, at birth, the lucifereans steal the umbilical, which is 'you', before the process is completed naturally. Take it away and do whatever they want? . Was a really interesting concept. One I will probably have to listen to again.

My village vicar is popping in for a catch up tomorrow. (I don't go to church and he likes to touch base every now and then, since burying my dear Mum) . I intended to relay that to him for an opinion (point of origin), along with the Titans and giant petrified Trees and Fauna (amongst other things) .

He has always stated that as he gets older the edges of what he believes gets fuzzy, so should be interesting.

As he lives in an old rectory, I will also be enquiring on the oldest books he has in the house collection. I am sure there will be a few. Hopefully ones that I am at least able to examine and maybe gain some insight in some of the subjects we discuss on these pages.

05 Mar 2020 16:09:43
Actually it is YT that is putting Taboo Conspiracy ii on my feed. I am not subscribed to him. Most of his stuff is mirrored, but that can be handy. As you have twice the chance of finding it.

I am not sure if true or not, but I have heard that some accounts that get banned on yt also get there viewers banned too. I'm guessing the stuff I watch wouldn't lead to that, but caution never hurt.

I usually find my info by random chance. Mainly on Bitchute, and if there is a yt mirror I will use that link as you can't make the video go full screen when embedded for some reason. At least, my computer won't.

I will warn you over bitchute though. There are things on there that you will never be able to un-see. Things that I am unwilling to describe on this site, or anywhere for that matter. Truly demonic.

I guess that's the price you pay for curiously searching for truth.

05 Mar 2020 15:21:34
How does this tie in with 'Corpus Juris' and the 'strawman', Ed?

I thought that, that is based around the 'capitalised surname' and I was under the impression that it was based on legalese, which has a construct.

Could you help clear the cognitive dissidence I am suffering from? or am I just looking at this from the wrong angle?

05 Mar 2020 15:26:08
Only sort of half watch the first video so far, then feel asleep, so didn't catch it all.

Did get me to think though, that when I have been shown photos from this time period, the reason for no people was 'long exposure time'.

But as shown in this video, in some of the photos you can see the blurred people, so surely that was a lie?

05 Mar 2020 13:12:27
Unbelievable. I presume it's no different here?

05 Mar 2020 07:40:34
Not only does low gravity make one take giant steps but also be able to levitate from the looks of this! Laughable. Don't know why people don't just come out and admit it was faked.

04 Mar 2020 21:51:04
It’s by Mark Sargent and I’ve just realised in the last minute he’s the same guy who did the predictive programming video that Ed033 posted on Monday. That’s probably how I found it. So thanks Ed033 for that find.

Yeah, I like his non preachy style SM. As you know I’m not a FE devotee, but anything is possible and I try to keep an open mind. I’ve started following him on YT. He has a lot of interesting vids. I’m also following Taboo Conspiracy ii (Ben) who’s a very interesting guy. I know you follow him SM, you post a lot of his videos, and I hope people here will share who they follow because it’s getting harder to find stuff on YT.