Latest replies

28 Nov 2016 23:27:57
I had heard this theory when I was last in America. Does it also include the 'Michelle was born a man' theory?

28 Nov 2016 22:30:52
There is nothing probable about the murders committed by Che and Fidel. They were murderous lunatics. You need to see them for what they were.

28 Nov 2016 22:07:17
as edd001 points out its not a black and white case, I have mentioned both prob murdered and jailed many, as for soft spot I would rather you use the word admire in respects to how they stood up against powerful forces .

28 Nov 2016 21:21:48
I believe you have a soft spot for Castro and his buddy Che Guevara. I would personally have tortured that c&*% Guevara for days. Castro was a despot who held an entire country to ransom. He did some nice stuff with healthcare, but I have met many cubans, and not one of them have anything good to say about Castro. Talk to Cubans Franky. And listen to their stories about how many of their relatives have disappeared. He was a tyrant and a murderer. He will be missed by you, and the president of my country, and a few other deluded fools.

28 Nov 2016 17:18:08
rian mandella killed inocent people, I am just playing devils advocate, the world was supposedly been better off without saddam hussein and muammar gaddafi but that is not working too well, like it or not we need necessary evils in this world .

28 Nov 2016 15:53:15
Hi Jonesy, There are two points up for debate here, the first is whether a 767 could achieve the speeds quoted and the second is would a 767 hold together at that speed. The first part is the speed, 360 knots is the max operating speed of a 767 at sea level but this is a prescribed limitation not a physical one, there is no doubt that a 767 could go faster than this if the throttle is fully opened and the plane is in descent.

A guy called John Bursill claims to have used a simulator to recreate the flight of United 175 and was able to achieve 654mph in level flight at 2000ft and 674mph in a shallow dive, much higher than the 560mph that United 175 is claimed to have been traveling on 9/11.

Of course his findings have been refuted by pilots for truth. The idea that a 767 would break up at that speed is based on an investigation by Pilots for Truth into an Air Egypt 767 which crashed. I found a thread on metabunk.org that tackled this with the conclusion that PfT had either misread the report or were wilfully lying.

The bottom line is that this is a theoretical debate as Boeing aren't too keen to test this with a real plane. It comes down to which internet source you believe is more credible, the sources I read made sense and effectively refuted the claims of Pilots for Truth and, as I'm someone who thinks planes did hit the towers, I'm inclined to believe that a 767 is perfectly capable of doing what the official narrative claimed it did.

I'd be interested to hear what your friend says, I too know someone, an ex-Army Air Corp pilot who now flys airliners out of Dubai, I'm not sure what model he flys but I might bother him for an opinion.

28 Nov 2016 10:39:33
Muscat I would like to see you answer Rians assertion out of interest, I have a close family friend who is a commercial airline pilot, and will be having this discussion with him tonight, if possible. cheers.

28 Nov 2016 10:20:35
She's a little distasteful in some of her views. But then anyone critical of the agenda is going to get tarred with certain brushes.

27 Nov 2016 22:34:29
interesting opinions thanks for responding.

27 Nov 2016 21:18:10
The world is better off without him Franky. Just because you believe other leaders have received less scrutiny for their crimes doesn't alter the fact that he murdered a lot of innocent Cubans.

27 Nov 2016 22:26:31
Id call him weak because he is weak. He's been anti EU all his career then in the run up to the referendum he was barely noncommittal at best. A few attacks in the media doesn't prove he's strong.

As I said all leaders have committed crimes. Check out what your country got upto in Greece and Italy in 1945.

27 Nov 2016 16:18:48
I'm a big fan of marine le pen. She's aware of the state of France and what's happening to it. She's a great candidate.

27 Nov 2016 15:38:14
kim the only real difference between castro and other leaders is, his crimes are well known and broadcasted .

how many times do you hear about our allies crimes?

churchill? never on maninstream news
french crimes in Algeria in the 1950s, 60s? etc
Belgium in the Congo Genocide?
general pinochet chile?

i could go on but you catch my drift,

i am going to steer away from my corbyn thoughts for the podcast but one thing to call him weak is strange considering no opposistion leader has never been attacked on this scale from day1 from the media to other parties including his own, the last thing I would call him is weak .

27 Nov 2016 13:58:02
Try this - Fidel Castro’s Venezuela obsession article.


goo.gl/wpgn3k

27 Nov 2016 13:43:40
Look at Castos role in Venezuela.

27 Nov 2016 13:43:00
If someone like Nigel Farage came out and defended Mussolini as a strong leader who defended his country and got the trains running on time, what would the reaction rightly be?

So what's the difference with Castro. Every leader has blood on their hands. Every leader does good and bad. But Castro is divisive. He's only popular because of anti Americanism.

Franky Corbyn talks sense sometimes. But he's a weak leader. He's a hypocrite. He's demanding loyalty from backbenchers when he voted against his own party leaders 500 times from the backbenches. Not once or twice or 10 times on important things like Iraq. But 500 times. How can he lead a party he consistently rebelled against.

He's a protester but organising protests isn't opposition. He has a lot of work to do to convince me he can win.

27 Nov 2016 12:18:48
i seen a tweet by marco rubio (who was favorite to be the next president ) he wrote similar to kim's thoughts that castro was a tyrant that murdered his own people and make he did I make no bones about that, in a perfect world everything would be done peacefully but we don't, castro prob murdered innocent people always thinking that they could be part of the coup to murder him, if you are the wests number 1 target from the 50s till the 90s then I do not care who you are, you will get paranoid and do terrible things .

around the time they tried to assassinate castro the americans were giving syphilis that killed 400 alone in 1972 .

the test started in in 1932 and only stopped because of a whistle blower .

what I am trying to say is everyone pointing the finger at castro have blood on their hands, and these imperial tyrants countries that have invaded country after country butchering their own people as well as innocent civilians are all hypocrites .

as for corbyn (not going to go on because you know how I feel about him ) he is a million miles from castro, he is trying to do the peaceful revolution and for all the people who have ridiculed his time in power should remember they have been wrong every time ( I will save the rest of my thoughts for my podcast )

not started it yet, not had the time, will get it done by xmas.

so for me castro was a strong leader who defended his country.

27 Nov 2016 12:28:53
mate the most common mistake of people trying to do the accent is to over do it, that is why its so hard to pull it off, I am crap at accents lol.

27 Nov 2016 12:22:10
embargos also (manufactured) oil prices getting cheaper were the major factors in Venezuela not chavez .

27 Nov 2016 11:05:51
Venezuela collapsed because of Chavez not because of his death.