Latest replies

07 Sep 2016 17:09:02
Ed, I don't think he should of said he was being impartial then at the beginning, he shot himself in the foot with that. I have to agree with Rian above that they have both done themselves a disservice here.

06 Sep 2016 16:18:05
that's the risk you take when you are in public office, perhaps mr vaz could chair a enquiry looking into the actions of himself!

06 Sep 2016 15:59:01
Ken O'Keefe seems like a child who's not getting his own way.

And I can't take someone who has a tattoo of a tear on his face seriously.

06 Sep 2016 17:34:02
Desperately disappointed with both Richie and Ken. Ken didn't give a straight answer to a single question, but I think Richie gave a much more sympathetic interview to Max than Ken, and was constantly interrupting him. Max was just as angry as Ken, but Richie saying, 'you're a very angry man Ken', was unnecessary, and he was clearly trying to antagonise Ken.

We still don't know what's going to happen to the money, which would have been good to know. I think Ken is totally burnt out, and he sounds like he needs to step back and realise his plan was flawed from the start, and make plans to return the money. But I'm not convinced he is a shill just yet, or behind a pyramid scheme. I do however think he is a complete arsehole.

This is a pathetic spat between two former best friends who are behaving like children. But I have lost a lot of respect for Richie Allen. There was no journalistic detachment. He was anything but neutral. The sarcasm, and the claim that 'I have no dog in this fight', despite the fact he clearly had his mind made up from the get go. And at other times he is so sycophantic when he is interviewing a guest he admires.

The real winner is the mainstream media, who can rightly point at these two interviews and say look, they're all bonkers.

06 Sep 2016 11:10:20
When chipping becomes compulsory it will be used to enforce the opposites.

06 Sep 2016 08:53:01
Ed033. good point but i'm thinking along the lines of neural network interface.

when you view the video there seems not to be any firing of any basic weapon but what about the rail gun? maybe miniaturised

i read something ages ago about the navy had a working rail gun on a ship

plus some of these drones have been seen around nuclear power plants.

06 Sep 2016 00:26:52
Like most so called 'perfect' historical figures, I feel her history has been cleaned up a little. For instance I read an article about her having offshore accounts where she was wiring a significant amount of the money donated to her.

05 Sep 2016 16:50:33
could it be an AI drone?
an operator under some type of AI interface could probably fly a drone at that speed knowing/ seeing what is around him at most times.
makes you think more about the aurora project if they retired the SR71 (or did they) .
i must admit it is an awesome craft!

Maybe elon musk has some non earth enemies due to possible future ventures?

05 Sep 2016 12:17:00
It makes sense that they may have been storing drugs, but the questions it raises about TVP are disturbing.

04 Sep 2016 21:57:06
I suppose it's possible to reasonably accurately calculate the speed. If it is Mach 4 that is just nuts. The SR71 needed to be 85000' amsl to achieve Mach 3, which in itself is spectacularly fast. It wouldn't do half that at sea level.

The more I look at this, the more questions I have. The airspace around Cape Canaveral is controlled with an almost paranoid zeal. If you fly even close to it you will get a warning. Whilst I cannot accurately estimate the size of this high speed craft, it seems to be at least several feet wide. NASA are either complicit in this, or it had the ability to avoid radar detection.

04 Sep 2016 20:12:09
According to a guy in the youtube comments on one of the other SpaceX rocket explosions, the object flying is traveling at Mach 4 or above.

Wasn't it Mach 2 that the Blackbird reached, and that was massive.

04 Sep 2016 15:35:45
Edd033 I think musk knows the technology that certain people would have. This man's creating a train that will travel 700mph and has eluded to Advanced technology before.

That's my point though. If he was to come out and say the rocket was destroyed by a drone and says this technology existed, I truly believe a lot would believe him especially if he was to release the advanced slowed down footage and provide evidence that there was nothing wrong with the rocket. His resume gives him leverage.

However this would all depend on his freedom of speech. Something I think he's never getting. For example nasa are aiding the investigation and some other corrupt agency. They'll provide a dodgy explanation or if musk was to elude the drone was responsible, most likely the footage would be tampered with And his companies would be heavily impacted by outside sources.

The explosion could already be the beginning of the end of space x. who knows as well if Zuckerberg's satellite didn't have something to do with it.

Was the explosion to prevent his satellite and African communications? Or is it to destroy musk's reputation.

04 Sep 2016 14:53:26
Edd033 disreguard that last reply mate. Hit reply by accident
I personally do not see a human driving that thing at that speed. Then again musk is designing a train that will travel at an almost unbelievable speed.
What's intriguing the most Imo is that musk will watch those videos slowed down to milliseconds. He will see that drone object at least 4 times and know now what's happened and what he now faces in the future. If he was to come out and say his rocket was purposely destroyed then I might get excited.

04 Sep 2016 13:52:51
Thanks Big Al, I don't doubt his brilliance for a moment, and I do think his rocket was blown up too. I guess the big question is who did it. The small fast object was uncannily similar to the one on 9/ 11 as one of you mentioned, and who would have that kind of tech?

04 Sep 2016 12:43:41
Rian
He's incredibly smart and will most likely go down in history for what he has planned. The tesla electric cars, and the Mars colonise. He's the face for anything space like jobs was to apple though we all know jobs wasn't the actual genius behind it all.
I asked how musk could be funded without adhering to the agenda. It's just not a free or creative world we all think we live in.
His rocket was blown up in my opinion. That object is seen numerous times in the longer video. So already he has his enemies or he's been given a stern warniNg. How he explains what happens will be extremely interesting because there's no way in hell he's going to say it was blown up by that object.
Do I trust him? No. You can't reallY. To be involved in space and the amount of money involved. It's like trusting hilary Clinton and the saudi arabia "donations "

04 Sep 2016 11:16:44
Me neither. Seems he has powerful enemies who don't either.

03 Sep 2016 23:45:20
Ed033, Al.

Do you trust him?

03 Sep 2016 19:42:46
Ed033 the military really have drones that fast? I seen an object as fast as that on the towers footage of 9/ 11.

03 Sep 2016 19:46:09
Edd033 most importantly man, I asked over a week ago how elon musk was basically the way forward and adhering to "their" agenda. Seems as if someone or maybe a competitor wants to destroy space x, his reputation or that Facebook satellite was purposely destroyed. Mark Zuckerberg afterall has been known to try and destroy people's businesses.

03 Sep 2016 09:25:35
I haven't heard of Igan but have listened to O'keefe on a few occasions. i'm playing catch up on the whole Conspiracy thing. Always knew things weren't right but thanks to social media and sites like this a whole new avenue of info is available to the inquisitive.