Latest replies

There happens to be a question mark after the word muslim, most probably meaning the poster is showwing that it's not fact but a guess.

Leuchter, along with all the other holocaust deniers (Cole, Irving etc) was a complete fraud. He used completely unscientific methods to proclaim a truth, which was completely discredited. There are numerous resources debunking every single holocaust denial myth. Holocaust denial is used as a justification and hope for the resurgence of national socialism and further persecution of Jews.
It's a pretty interesting subject; but ultimately a complete waste of time if you're looking for some hidden truth about the holocaust.

06 Jan 2015 09:12:40
How do you know its a muslim driving the bin lorry,

i thought the identy was being kept a secret

I think the law changes only effect the Monarch, heir and second heir to the throne and Charles was very pally with Saville.
The 'buy-off' is the plans to increase freedom of information requests on organisations such as the Police Chiefs and Finance Ombudsmen, but you can't help but feel this is to protect old big ears.
Mac

What if he is innocent, as he claims? Surely on a website where people claim that adolf hitler wasn't the monster that history proclaims, then surely we discuss the possibility that maybe the courts/ jury got it wrong, as Evans claims. He must have advisers telling him to say sorry etc, so he can resume his footy career, but would you say sorry for a crime you didn't commit? Everything on here is questioned, from the Boston bombings to the moon landings, but not one person has questioned this. Political correctness gone mad, or a subject too far even for this site?? I personally think that if he is guilty, then castrate him, but I think he deserves to have the same open minded debate/ reasoning that some of histories "monsters" have on this site.

Throwing another name into the mix Ed001 - Marlon King.

I didn't realise he was serving the time on licence either. He needs to wait until he has paid his whole time then before being considered for a comeback. Obviously the acceptance of 100% guilt first should also go without saying.

Lee Hughes got a second chance after killing someone whilst drink driving. That is no better than rape as far as I am concerned, they are both deplorable acts. But if he was allowed, I don't see how Evans can't be, it has to be one rule for all and the precedence has been set.

There are no easy solutions to aberrant behaviour. What is completely neglected in our society is the root cause of a great deal of crime, and any attempts to remedy social disease. Only the punishment is considered. It's dealing with the symptoms rather than the cause.

Yes, I didn't realise he's still serving his time albeit on licence.
People do deserve a second chance and to be able to put things right but it's too big a gamble for a football club when it starts interfering with their income etc. It's also a bit of a non-starter if he cannot accept his guilt, but that won't be happening if he honestly believes himself to be innocent.

Well they have been known to hang around with pedos, necros & murderers, and intermarry with nazis so I imagine quite a lot!

He shows no remorse or acceptance of guilt so he's not going to be any use for charity work!
I'm torn on the issue tbh. He's done his crime & his time and should be allowed to get on with his life. But as long as he's in the public eye playing football that is possibly further damaging to his victim.

{Ed033's Note - Link to the hitler documentary if you haven't watched it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g

{Ed033's Note - Just for the record, I personally haven't said anything at all about this Glasgow lorry event.

Hard to tell with ed 33, he comes accross as it being his opinion, I don't know why you would put the other side to a accident any way, in that case you would have to make "the other case " on some many incidents, i'm sure somebody famous has died in the last 24 hrs, is there a need to express the "other side " to every death?

Funny that a edd shuts this idea down but it was ed 33 that came up with it lol

You have also got to remember that the driver fell unwell at the wheel and maybe just maybe for the 20 or 30 seconds it took to drive up the road he did manage to keep the vehicle straight? before he lost consciousness.

now I am only giving out my idea/theory and not saying that this is what happened.

if there would be a false flag event in glasgow or even scotland i'm sure there would be more viable options

Can I also point out the vehicle would have to have veered hard right to have ploughed through George square.

Its actually pretty hard to turn the wheel of a truck of that size, well maybe not hard but its certainly not as easy to turn as a car with power steering.

Geordie Al

Can I point out that lorries are better maintained than cars & vans, and steering will stay straight & true.
Also these vehicles are automatic so do not require using a clutch so would not stall as easy.
This is the reason so many conspiracy theories are ridiculed, accidents do happen, I also come from glasgow and know the area very well, and to me there is no conspiracy, just a terrible accident.
Jaj

You should look up on some facts before even hinting at this to be a 'false flag' attack. I would love to know what the 'elite' would gain from such an attack like this? It was a horrible accident that claimed 6 lives, and the fact people are going on about it not being a higher death toll is sickening, thankfully people would have heard the racket of a bin lorry outta control and managed to get out the way. Your point on its speed, u do realise a bin lorry is automatic, so all it would need is a dead weight on the accelerator pedal to gain speed. Seems to me some people are just trying to be controversial on this site at times, that or the fact they need to follow what there favourite ED writes, funnily enough, just like the sheep u call people who question your questions.