Latest replies

14 Apr 2014 21:31:22
Cant seem to find the original article.

Kim Philby

Haven't seen about the electro-magnetic railgun but, I did see something a few days ago about using sea water as fuel. I believe they used the sea water to power an RC plane/car (can't remember) as a proof of concept. Hopefully it goes on to be used in a more widespread fashion.
Michael.

Just noticed that Aldous Huxley has posted a link about the seawater fuel slightly further down the page if anyone wants a link. Any links for the electro-magnetic railgun Kim as it sounds interesting?
Michael.

Sorry ed. Thought I was signed in.

Difficult where to start with this one. So many "conspiracies. " Firstly, why was it built in the first place? as the the previous Airport was fine. No delays and handled the traffic. It was hardly falling to pieces either. Secondly, the sheer size of it. The land is huge. They don't use all of it on the surface, but apparently they have miles of concrete tunnels underneath. They never used the same people to build the tunnels, so no-one really knows the layout down there. Apparently they put a sprinkler system down there? Why would you need a sprinkler system in concrete tunnels? Well it turns them into gas chambers!
The queen and a lot of wealthy people have brought property surrounding the airport.
The place is full of symbols of the nwo and illuminati. The murials in the airport depict a mass population culling.
And to top it off, the runways kind of look like a swastika from above! Loads of good vids on youtube mate.

13 Apr 2014 16:19:47
If you mean the murals they are utterly bizarre yet go unnoticed by most people who pass through.

Kim Philby

Wow this subject is popular!

My view which is not backed up by hard evidence is that most of them are good at reading the person in front of them rather than receiving messages from the departed, I did watch a Youtube vid once on how they do this, think John Edwards was the psychic in question.
Saying that I can't say all are frauds who knows what we are truly capable of and what happens when the body dies ( I just hope they have Larger)

Jonty

I don't buy into the soothsayers myself either, but my dad died 3 years ago, in the early hours of the morning, and I kept waking up thinking the phone was ringing, and knew something wasn't right, then the call arrived from my sister.

Unfortunately I don't know what amount of change would justify an action. All I know is that things are slowly deteriorating and its really getting to me. People already living below the breadline are getting sanctioned by the jobcentre, taking their pittance away from them. How are people supposed to survive like that? People seem to just accept it as the norm and deal with it when in reality we should be uniting to say 'No, we won't stand for this any longer!' I just wish more people would realise this instead of shrugging it off. I don't believe any change will come any time soon but its nice to dream about it though.
Michael

I don't like him either BUT he will go free! I have a feeling

Another reason for people with real abilities to keep quiet is that if one did come forward how long till their in a military lab somewhere being put under all sort of tests to find out what causes the ability and can it be recreated.

10 Apr 2014 18:18:10
Miller will be back in a cabinet job in 12 months assuming a Cameron win at the GE.

Labour won't say too much over it, they got their cheap scalp but won't do no more than make noise as they are no better. People in glass houses throw no stones no?

Kim Philby

Surely if the person getting the psychic in to give them comfort and help put their mind at rest about someone they've lost, then surely that person can maybe finally be at ease, for example the husband that's lost his wife and hasn't been able to sleep for the lost feeling inside can now feel at ease if they are told their wife is at their side watching over them, giving someone hope or happiness can't be that much of a bad thing can it?

Ed, you've got to be joking mate? Dawkins fake as psychics? Really? Get a grip. Have you read any of his books? I doubt you have because with that comment you made you clearly know nothing of the man.
I also don't hang on every word they say either, I merely take some of what they say on board, because they use SCIENCE to prove things. Not pseudoscience. You think homeopathy works to? Lol
Having your wee "narrow minded" jabs at me is fine mate, take it that means your view is narrow minded because it's not the same as mine? You'll see from the hundreds of posts I've had on here through the years, that I'm not a narrow minded person. But you can keep your opinion anyway, means nothing to me what you think, as i'm sure, the feeling is mutual.
You say because I don't agree with what some think on here I'm narrow minded, so if we don't agree then one of us is narrow minded? Bit silly and immature don't you think?

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

Jay, there was a friend of my wife who had been to see Sally at least four times and was extolling the virtues of her. Even my wife, who sort of believed she was genuine turned to me half way through as said "should we go?". The only thing that kept me there was the fact that I'd paid for the tickets!

Totally agree ryan, tip of the iceberg.

Like you said mate we will not agree on everything, good thought provoking post.

Hi Lucas, psychic Sally, and that other clown john Edward really are terrible human beings.

Hi franky, fair enough mate, each to their own eh?

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

Those 3 I mentioned are more respectable than any psychic you can speak of ed, you know that's true!
Dawkins is the least showmen of the 3, a respected biologist and a damn clever man.

I know what I said isn't the greatest way of testing, I'll leave that to people with a lot more knowledge and understanding than myself. Was merely a suggestion as to a kind of way I'd like seeing it tested.
Look ed, if a psychic says, I can speak to spirits, then I should be able to ask whatever question I like and get a valid answer without any clever word play.
If they say, it's images I see, then I should be able to ask what those images are and what they have to do with me, not them asking me if these images "mean anything to me".
If the say they can mind read, I should be able to communicate through thought shouldn't i? Asking questions etc.
What I'm saying is, if a psychic says I can do a, b or c then it should be scrutinised by a non believer, one that will be honest. And one we know that is a true non believer, not some person pretending they've just "came round" after witnessing themselves for the first time.

Zari, I wouldn't worry about that happening mate, no one has these abilities as far as I'm concerned!
I've said before, I think it would open up a whole knew understanding, with even more follow up questions as to where it could take us. But sadly I never see it happening.

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

When I say proven franky, I mean it in every sense of the way. Blind testing would be the best way. Because, if this ability is to be believed, then they should be able to answer any question by anyone, without even speaking to an individual at all. Like, if there are 5 people, get the psychic to tell you who each one is by name, location, career, family etc. And loads more stuff like that. At no point should the psychic be able to talk to any of the testees, simply look at them and know everything. Because that's what they claim they can do, mind read, receive messages, see images, know who has passed away etc. So let's call them out on it. And only have respectable examiners, like Dawkins, derren brown, james randi etc. Also have some reputable psychics on there too if there are any. That's one way you could do it. Although I do see the implications of who the 5 people would be.
Something along those lines franky would help me change my view on psychics franky mate. It's just the way I am I suppose!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow