Ed033’s profile

18 Feb 2020 20:39:59
Some serious time spent truth seeking SM.
Fair play,
Yes nuking the dome was the video SM.
And yes that would be fair to assume they were trying to hit something Ed33.

18 Feb 2020 19:38:48
This is the article quoted:

Earth's Plasma Shield

18 Feb 2020 19:24:48
Nuking The Dome - Military Nuclear Tests Blast The Dome Firmament

18 Feb 2020 19:33:46
This is s repost from a few weeks back, but seems relevant.

Rockets Hitting God's Crystal Firmament Above Our Heads

18 Feb 2020 19:30:33
The footage above is from this video. Gives some more details for those interested.

Operation Fishbowl video

18 Feb 2020 19:03:06
Yes Sm
there was a vid also.
That was part of operation fish bowl
Were u could see explosions the same shape as if it hit something.

18 Feb 2020 18:22:58
Cheers ed33
I've always looked in just not posted for awhile.

18 Feb 2020 17:12:33
Always found flat earth to be interesting topic.
Just opens your eyes to quite a lot that you would just not normally question,
Because what we have been taught as a fact
Not as best theory .
Used to be Southampton 87.

18 Feb 2020 17:49:29
Yeah sorry, Ed. I forgot my opinion is worthless because I haven't been 'schooled'.

18 Feb 2020 14:45:58
So its not possible for a fisheye lens to turn a curve, flat? . Interesting. Has anyone got a Fisheye to test this? Sadly, I haven't.

With the atmospheric lensing, the MS say that when you see the Sun set. The Sun has already gone behind the curvature of the Earth and it is the atmosphere bending light around the Earth, so that we can see it.

Now, in this video the atmosphere is explained to get denser, so you can only see up to a certain point, regardless of apparatus.

I can think of a way to test either without being on an Earth size scale. I know light can be bent through water. And rainbows are always curved (which is probably due to water droplets being round) . Any help on this?

I did watch a video where several sunsets were filmed and a line was drawn following the path of the sunset. You would expect the lines to be curved if the Earth is rotating round the Sun, whilst spinning at 1000mph. But they were all straight lines.

18 Feb 2020 12:18:39
I really like it though :)

I had a look on yewtoob, and the first comment made me chuckle;

"Look, if you think any American official is going to tell you the truth, then you're stupid. Did you hear that? -stupid. "

Quote from Arthur Sylvester, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, 1965.

18 Feb 2020 10:45:54
Very compelling presentation, but I wish he and others would use the word proof a bit more judiciously. Strong evidence and proof are not the same thing.

13 Feb 2020 21:33:15
Are you no different from the 'elite' making me be your whore. haha. :)

13 Feb 2020 20:32:02
Have you not seen the Earth glitch out, but not the tesla in Spacex's footage?

This just adds weight to a clear fake.

13 Feb 2020 20:22:27
Believe in the globe and the universe you are weakened and alone?

Believe in a flat immovable Earth, an intelligent Creator and everything seems right?

You can not fake the tears of happiness this lady had when told what DITHRH believes to be true.

Now if she believed things the other way round, would the video be the same?

13 Feb 2020 20:11:24
I enjoyed this. Someone talking on what they believe but making it tie in with things. Interesting concept. Well thought out and he believes it.

Do you think it's ritualistic to separate things mid-event? . Or a case of what's best for the physically formed baby? . I don't know enough about this subject but, if down to me, nature knows best. But things CAN go wrong, so fear will put us in the hands of who we believe to be best for the situation. (we know no better)

A lot to think about, like the ownership of the placenta. It would be easier to think about this, if I knew where I sit. As in what I believe.

I believe in things, but I am not sure what they are. It is their call that guides me to do my best to find them.

09 Feb 2020 22:41:09
To me its a seductive argument because I would have to only go on facts I can not test myself.

And the sextant alignment adds weight. I have never seen a 'debunking' video on sextants.

Too ill to process ATM.

09 Feb 2020 20:45:05
Just watched some PAD stuff. Seems to all come back to the perspective thing? Which to me, makes sense.

I won't start a new post because it links in with your OP.



The solar orbiter mission is set to launch soon. But it still looks like they are using paper, tinfoil, plastic and the famous lunar plastic orange tape.

09 Feb 2020 13:40:06
My first thoughts on this was how to go about measuring the distance Our eyes are limited too.

Then I realised that we don't actually see across any distances at all. It, is the light from the object we are looking at, that travels the distance. We just process the light data. Poor eyesight corrupts this data.

So you would need to know the limits of light travelling through the aether to know how far we can see.

08 Feb 2020 22:22:55
I believe so, Ed.

Was that just to get the Russians to try? . I don't know. I don't think so.

The interesting thing is pretty much the only thing Russia and the rest of the World are in alignment with is space and the antarctic treaty.

Now why is that?