09 Feb 2020 12:12:55
If the Sun was 93 million miles away we wouldn\'t be able to see it with our naked eyes, let alone the alleged \'stars\' over 4 light years away Our eyes by themselves can\'t physically see anything millions of miles away?
09 Feb 2020 13:40:06
My first thoughts on this was how to go about measuring the distance Our eyes are limited too.
Then I realised that we don\'t actually see across any distances at all. It, is the light from the object we are looking at, that travels the distance. We just process the light data. Poor eyesight corrupts this data.
So you would need to know the limits of light travelling through the aether to know how far we can see.
My first thoughts on this was how to go about measuring the distance Our eyes are limited too.
Then I realised that we don\'t actually see across any distances at all. It, is the light from the object we are looking at, that travels the distance. We just process the light data. Poor eyesight corrupts this data.
So you would need to know the limits of light travelling through the aether to know how far we can see.
{Ed033\'s Note - It\'s a difficult one as we each have our own personal viewing dome or personal atmospheric dome (PAD), if you\'ve seen this concept in any videos.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
09 Feb 2020 20:45:05
Just watched some PAD stuff. Seems to all come back to the perspective thing? Which to me, makes sense.
I won\'t start a new post because it links in with your OP.
The solar orbiter mission is set to launch soon. But it still looks like they are using paper, tinfoil, plastic and the famous lunar plastic orange tape.
Just watched some PAD stuff. Seems to all come back to the perspective thing? Which to me, makes sense.
I won\'t start a new post because it links in with your OP.
The solar orbiter mission is set to launch soon. But it still looks like they are using paper, tinfoil, plastic and the famous lunar plastic orange tape.
{Ed033\'s Note - What we might have to realise is that there is no such thing as millions of miles above us anyway.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
09 Feb 2020 22:41:09
To me its a seductive argument because I would have to only go on facts I can not test myself.
And the sextant alignment adds weight. I have never seen a \'debunking\' video on sextants.
Too ill to process ATM.
To me its a seductive argument because I would have to only go on facts I can not test myself.
And the sextant alignment adds weight. I have never seen a \'debunking\' video on sextants.
Too ill to process ATM.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0