08 Feb 2020 22:10:08 I don't believe we have reached the Moon, Ed. I just want to make that clear. I am just trying to find proof that no one can deny.
I mentioned this before about the clouds in front of the Moon, from ones perspective, are more brightly lit. There is a 'theory' which has taken weight in the mainstream, called 'Mie scattering'.
This is just a theory, though. So, again it is a choice of what you believe. I have questioned a lot of late, what I believe.
This is one thing that I have noticed over the last few months, is that I have taken theories as fact. Because they are accepted in the mainstream.
That doesn't make them the truth. It just means they are accepted as such. And almost forced upon us.
As for luminaries being plasma. Is plasma not in a state of flux? which would make it hard to define a stationary surface? .
There is a debate. If you have two sextants at a measurable distance apart. A measurement from both calculates that the Sun has a 32 mile diameter and is 3000 miles away.
Now I bet Ernest Shackleton would say that a sextant is pretty reliable.
I do not know measurements for the Moon, but I guess that it would be similar.
08 Feb 2020 22:18:30 Haha. But the thing is, Rian. They do not appear deformities of the human race as we know it. Their proportions are beautifully aligned with their size.
Does this mean that they must be a separate race? . A race of giants? Maybe the last dying genetic threads of an ancient race that once ruled this realm? .
07 Feb 2020 01:44:13 Orange juice aside (I need to look into that) I have seen many NASA videos, where the physics of what they have told us about the MOON, just don't add up.
The footage of the astronaut asking for his colleague to push down on his (space) helmet, is a prime example. There are many more.
I have not heard the knocking sounds video before, though. Could that be added, FakeFX? . (again i need to look in to this) .
06 Feb 2020 23:54:20 I’m not really sure what you think you are seeing then? Throughout the month we see the moon go through different phases until full moon. If the video is saying there is only half a moon then where does the rest of it suddenly appear from and disappear to during the month. We see a small crescent all the way to a full moon, and the video doesn’t address that or make any explanation for just saying there’s only half a moon.
Is that just what we could think because of the 'Mr Blue Marble' effects on the 3D version of a 2D scan?
Is that effect because of water or atmosphere on the Earth? . We are told the Moon has none. (Maybe a little water, but let's not be pedantic :) ) . So therefor no hotspot?
NASA has Moon dust. Why is the Moon so luminous/ reflective? . Has NASA run tests? I know they say its spiky/ sharp as hell. Isn't it what, apparently caused the 'Jade Rabbit 2' or rather 'Yutu 2' to malfunction? .
Why is there no proof of the reflectiveness of lunar rock. It looks dull to me. Maybe i need to put the images in Photoshop and flip the polarity? . (Ah, that's better)
These are questions I am asking myself as much as anyone because that's where the truth lies. (see what I did there? ) .
06 Feb 2020 07:35:31 The Earth is mostly covered in the most unreflective substance known to humankind. Water. So no sunlight would get reflected from the Earth to the Moon.
06 Feb 2020 07:41:33 It is strange how common folk like farmers and the working class find giant humanoid-like skeletons. And then, schooled 'archaeologists' find dinosaurs.
Back in the day there was hundreds of articles of finding giants, in 'news' papers. Now with just get the propaganda sheets we don't see these anymore.
I seem to remember you posting about a red giant in Iraq, Ed. Found by a few US soldiers in the recent Iraq war. I am recalling that right? .
Interesting subject that leads nicely into the 'fallen Titan' subject.
05 Feb 2020 23:45:42 Hi. but you are looking at the moon from Earth, the light is coming from the sun. So the sun is hitting the whole of the front side of the moon that faces the sun. The half we cannot see is the back of the moon from the suns perspective. So if you shone a torch at a pool ball it wouldn’t light up the back of the ball for example.
05 Feb 2020 20:13:13 Hi. The moon itself doesn't emit any light like the sun. What we see when we see the moon is sunlight reflected off the moon. The phase of the moon is how much of the moon appears to us on Earth to be lit up by the sun. So here we can only see the half of the moon that is being hit by the sunlight. As the moon orbits the earth throughout the month then we see more Phases through to full moon. Hope that helps.
05 Feb 2020 14:59:40 Well the whole subject of the enormous secrecy around Antarctica is something I have been trying to find more about the last couple of years. It is so hard to find anything of substance. This guy at least confirms my suspicion that it is nothing to do with environmental concerns. I remember a couple of years ago you posted something about some very high profile people visiting a particular spot in Antarctica.
I'm also interested in the pyramids down there, and of course I expect you are interested from a flat earth perspective. There is definitely something being kept from us imo.
03 Feb 2020 21:26:06 I am just going to repeat a section of my previous post, because it was one of the main things that really got me to see my views now.
"NASA and other space agencies have launched countless equipment in to space to the outer planets that they could have used to take a full view picture of the Earth. But they haven't. They have photoshopped 2d data over a globe model and then make it look pretty. Why? . "
I admit I need to do some proper research to know exact figures on the VA belts, and I do understand what you are saying regarding radiation. I am not sure it's a valid argument though. I don't know enough on the subject.
Wasn't the VA belts supposed to be 10,000 times higher than normal because of a solar flare at the time of the lunar missions?
And why have we got NASA saying that we need to overcome the problem of the VA belts before humans can travel through it? .
They say they have been to the Moon with 1960's tech, but have lost all the data and now need to figure out how to get past the VA belts when we are in 2020? Come on, none of it adds up.
03 Feb 2020 19:48:37 1. So does that also mean Ruscosmos, European Space Agency, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, China Nations Space Agency and the Indian Space Research Organisation are all propaganda tools too? Because these agencies are regularly pumping out news stories that corroborate what NASA say, even though they do their own research and development.
2. On April 8th 2002, I watched the space shuttle Atlantis take off from the Kennedy Space center - was that fake?
3. And aside from being slightly annoying like a hyperactive child, what's wrong with Neil de Grasse Tyson? He's one of the top scientists of the 21st century, along with Sean Carroll, Brian Cox, Carl Sagan, etc.
03 Feb 2020 12:01:38 That's fine SM, we all have our bad days.
I won't deny there are cover ups a plenty in the world, but I personally just don't see the Moon landing being one of them. The major holes in the mainstream view of the Moon landing can all be explained. But a lot of the things that can't be explained, don't really hold enough weight to say "it was faked". That's just my personal view of course.
The VA belts are interesting, Mr. VA himself did indeed say that it would be impossible to sustain life in these belts, but that quote was actually cherry picked. The entire statement is referring to a 2 year manned mission in the VA belt, to which he said it's impossible. He has never said it's impossible to pass through them, just it's impossible to sustain life in the belts. He also publicly denounced the conspiracies about the VA belts killing the astronauts. Here is a link to an e-mail conversation with James van Allen himself, talking about the belts. forum.cosmoquest.org/archive/index.php/t-3885.html
The thing with radiation it's all about the length of time spent within an irradiated area. A good example is Chernobyl, you can drive through Chernobyl in a car wearing shorts and t-shirt, without developing any issues due to radiation exposure.
Me personally, I'm looking for anything to show signs of Alien life. So things like HD 101065 (Przybylski's Star), which is a star that has plutonium with in it's spectrum, are fascinating to me. Same with KIC 8462852 (Tabby's star), which had strange dimming patterns and the mainstream media went into a frenzy, claiming it was a dyson sphere.
As much as I find some conspiracies entertaining, I just find the stuff I listed in the previous paragraph far more interesting.
03 Feb 2020 10:21:06 On one of the vids either Ed033 or SM posted recently there is a reference to a laser test successfully being done in the early sixties by both the US and the Russians. Who put the mirrors up for that test? Or is it the science that is flawed?
If it comes from NASA, it’s propaganda. Next you’ll be quoting Neil de Grasse Tyson.
Southern Monkey · 09 Feb 2020 08:47
