HERBIE’s profile

28 Oct 2014 23:14:49
Some chap claimed to have decided star maps based in the signals and claimed it was 13000 years old and from epsilon booted but based off old data. They though it was 103 light years away which put it as an f5 on the main sequence which means any possible planets could have supported life, however the data was incorrect and its actually 203 ly away which put it at an a0 and means it was incapable of supporting life.

Who says it has to be alien anyway? If it was 13000 years old that would dare to the time of the war in the Vedas. Maybe its of an earthly origin. Maybe even the superweapon described I the Vedas.

Exactly ed, let's see how bill gates feels if he's not in the surviving 10%!

Attain your mind!

Dont understand the answer, is there not a number of human population that we should try not to excede

Ahhh that's how.
I was reading that its thought Tesla was actually the first person to find the signal in 1899.
Its all a little strange to me, i'm sure Franky will have looked into this, he likes his UFO stuff.

27 Oct 2014 17:38:07
{Ed033's Note - To people who want to reduce the population, why don't you volunteer to go first?

There might not be a shortage now but at what point do you state that there will be, you can't keep having expanding population, anybody who can't see this needs to look at the state of the world at the moment, add another 7 billion to that.

27 Oct 2014 13:11:36
Of course it is, we all know this but they won't admit it. Gates and co would argue more oil is needed for heating, power and manufacturing rather than release hidden technology.

26 Oct 2014 22:40:00
What's the maximum capacity of the planet? How can we sustain an ever growing population that's doubled in fifty years. The balance of ecology has became unbalanced. How do we repair the damage to the environment whilst maintaining the standard of living? How can we provide everyone on the planet with the same standard of living as those in the 'first world'? Increasing the number of cows increases co2 emissions. More oil etc. Can the planet feasibly support over 7 billion people, many of whom live in appalling conditions. I don't support Gates but can anyone answer these questions, as this is the argument him and his fascistic supporters will propose and only with answers can they be stopped.

Ive said it before, "Those rich folk are weird ones"
He talks about depopulation but not as in genocide but prevention (birth rates for instance), this man is a snake who has reportedly ploughed 11 billion£ into vaccine research.
Some theorists believe he is satan himself.

Herbie you might as well give him a moustache and a Hugo Boss uniform. The man is a right wing lunatic.

I've always wondered with all these rich and powerful elite who want to reduce the world's population by 95%, who is going to empty their bins, clean up after them etc? The would actually have to have a slave underclass to support their lifestyle.

As for the Co2 argument he presents, it's nonsense. If instead, we reduced our cattle population by 90%, that would lead to an enormous drop on Co2 emissions.

Don't forget also that Gates is a shareholder in Monsanto, which really should be called Poison Inc.

Ryan.

21 Oct 2014 16:36:01
Yes, I'm not an expect on the middle east, too many competing sides and shifting loyalties. I thought it would be something like that, playing one side against another.

The Israelis are a devious bunch, and the arabs aren't much better. Even Putin has more sense than to get involved in that mess.

Thanks for the explanation makes a lot of sense.

Kim Philby

Kim there is one important factor in all the current battles in middle east and it's that the terrorists now (ISIS, Al Nusra. ) are all against and fighting Shiiaa Muslims.
And the biggest threat in the region to Israel is Hizbollah who are the Shiiaas that are fighting these clans in Syria and such. It just comes down to "what benefits us now" and the what benefits now Israel against Iran/Hizbollah is training and opening roads and arming ISIS. (another example on benefits is Turkish gov helping ISIS against Kurds)
For funding, it is quiet known who are exactly the individuals doing it and yes most comes from KSA but the game changer and you can say almost totally in control of this is Bandar Bin Sultan. So now yes Israel is aiding but the creators of ISIS are from the royal family of the Saudi kingdom. The hatred that exists between both sects of Islam has reached its peak.

Amazing point that the arabic powers are under Israel's controls because in each country there is atleast one high ranking political individual who strictly works under Israel's agenda. Example Walid Jumblat in Lebanon or just take now the leader of Hamas party who's daughter is being treated currently in Israel in an Israeli hospital while all Gaza got blown up and their citizens well had no right to be medicated.

J.

{Ed033's Note - How about this, if you think the British government are the enemies of the ira and vice versa, don't we all know that MI6 took over managing the ira and then got the ira to place bombs in Britain and the funds for it came from the middle east and america?

Or the arabic powers are under israel's controls?

21 Oct 2014 12:39:16
I'm not an expert on the middle east ( only had one trip professionally and hated the place, couldn't have done it as a whole tour) but I've read up on these Wahhabis and their a really strict sect with a lot of influence on the Saudi royal family. Even influenced bin laden. It makes sense for them to be funding Isis given they claim to follow an ultra strict version of Islam.

What doesn't make sense to me then is the Israeli link. If the funding comes from an ultra strict Islamic sect which would consider the existence of Israel an abomination, why would they both be involved I the creation of Isis? I could see one or the other on their own and can see what they would get out of it. Or is it a case of my enemies enemy is my friend?

Kim Philby

20 Oct 2014 19:26:14
The most f***** up thing is people watching the staged killings/beheadings of American and British journalists and not having a clue on the real assasinations of hard working truth seeking journalists like Serena Shim.
The Turkish government wiped her out for revealing Erdogan's dirty strategies. The middle east is even getting more and more volatile these days and I'd wouldn't be surprised that the west and Europe now stand next to Jabhat Al Nusra (al Qaida branch) against ISIS, a sequel To the ISIS movie.

J.

20 Oct 2014 18:22:21
Isis funding comes from wahabbis in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Yes I think the beheadings were done post mortem. Well hopefully anyway. It might be a bit of a stretch, but could the alleged beheading of Lee Rigby somehow be connected? It was a very public (however dubious) spectacle, and the shock value was somewhat similar to the ISIS beheadings. Was it an attempt to manipulate the public into associating beheadings with muslim extremism, and therefore make it more likely for us to accept what we are now seeing?

Ryan.

Yes I agree they will be dead but how they actually died is a different story but the general public needs to shocked by the deaths.
Is there a better way to shock than a televised beheading?

Location wise it might be staged and who is running the whole shabang but on the whole I think they are all dead after all in the great scheme of things they are not important people, just pawns.