26 Oct 2014 04:52:34
Bill Gates on population control, is he a monster or just misunderstood.
https://archive.org/details/WipeOutHumans-BillGates-VaccinesArebestWayToDepopulatePlanet
Herbie you might as well give him a moustache and a Hugo Boss uniform. The man is a right wing lunatic.
I've always wondered with all these rich and powerful elite who want to reduce the world's population by 95%, who is going to empty their bins, clean up after them etc? The would actually have to have a slave underclass to support their lifestyle.
As for the Co2 argument he presents, it's nonsense. If instead, we reduced our cattle population by 90%, that would lead to an enormous drop on Co2 emissions.
Don't forget also that Gates is a shareholder in Monsanto, which really should be called Poison Inc.
Ryan.
I've always wondered with all these rich and powerful elite who want to reduce the world's population by 95%, who is going to empty their bins, clean up after them etc? The would actually have to have a slave underclass to support their lifestyle.
As for the Co2 argument he presents, it's nonsense. If instead, we reduced our cattle population by 90%, that would lead to an enormous drop on Co2 emissions.
Don't forget also that Gates is a shareholder in Monsanto, which really should be called Poison Inc.
Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Ive said it before, "Those rich folk are weird ones"
He talks about depopulation but not as in genocide but prevention (birth rates for instance), this man is a snake who has reportedly ploughed 11 billion£ into vaccine research.
Some theorists believe he is satan himself.
He talks about depopulation but not as in genocide but prevention (birth rates for instance), this man is a snake who has reportedly ploughed 11 billion£ into vaccine research.
Some theorists believe he is satan himself.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
26 Oct 2014 22:40:00
What's the maximum capacity of the planet? How can we sustain an ever growing population that's doubled in fifty years. The balance of ecology has became unbalanced. How do we repair the damage to the environment whilst maintaining the standard of living? How can we provide everyone on the planet with the same standard of living as those in the 'first world'? Increasing the number of cows increases co2 emissions. More oil etc. Can the planet feasibly support over 7 billion people, many of whom live in appalling conditions. I don't support Gates but can anyone answer these questions, as this is the argument him and his fascistic supporters will propose and only with answers can they be stopped.
What's the maximum capacity of the planet? How can we sustain an ever growing population that's doubled in fifty years. The balance of ecology has became unbalanced. How do we repair the damage to the environment whilst maintaining the standard of living? How can we provide everyone on the planet with the same standard of living as those in the 'first world'? Increasing the number of cows increases co2 emissions. More oil etc. Can the planet feasibly support over 7 billion people, many of whom live in appalling conditions. I don't support Gates but can anyone answer these questions, as this is the argument him and his fascistic supporters will propose and only with answers can they be stopped.
{Ed001's Note - what does 'More oil etc.' even mean? There is no shortage of food, it is just that it is not shared equitably. Too much of the world's wealth is in the hands of too few, like Gates.}
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
27 Oct 2014 13:11:36
Of course it is, we all know this but they won't admit it. Gates and co would argue more oil is needed for heating, power and manufacturing rather than release hidden technology.
Of course it is, we all know this but they won't admit it. Gates and co would argue more oil is needed for heating, power and manufacturing rather than release hidden technology.
{Ed033's Note - Wow, anyone saying anything like, "Increasing the number of cows increases co2 emissions", has had their mind messed with by the mainstream propaganda nonsense.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
There might not be a shortage now but at what point do you state that there will be, you can't keep having expanding population, anybody who can't see this needs to look at the state of the world at the moment, add another 7 billion to that.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
27 Oct 2014 17:38:07
{Ed033's Note - To people who want to reduce the population, why don't you volunteer to go first?
{Ed033's Note - To people who want to reduce the population, why don't you volunteer to go first?
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Dont understand the answer, is there not a number of human population that we should try not to excede
{Ed001's Note - why?}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Exactly ed, let's see how bill gates feels if he's not in the surviving 10%!
Attain your mind!
Attain your mind!
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I think it was obvious before that the cow reference was to methane, didn't need a smerky comment after it
{Ed033's Note - When anyone wites, "Increasing the number of cows increases co2 emissions" in a human population thread, this is laughable. Only someone who is completely brainwashed by the mainstream media would make such a comment and this is not a mainstream media web site.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
So 14 billion would not have a massive adverse effect on the planet, there has to be a point at which we would destroy earth for our selves that we should strive to not surpass, I'm not sure where you draw the line though and it is like playing god, I enjoy this site and have learnt a lot however being told to kill myself by one of the eds seems a bit excessive, any way ignoring ed 033 who seems to use adhominems when ever anybody dares to disagree with him do others feel there needs to be cut of point we strive for in terms of population?
{Ed033's Note - The overall agenda isn't a sensible one and the ruling elite don't think in a sensible way. They have been trying to use any soft-kill idea they can come up with to lower the population. We actually have no idea whether at this stage the human population isn't actually going down over time and by 2100 A.D. could actually be 2 billion, just using the soft-kill methods already in place.
Here's the way I see it at the moment, There are 2 elite groups. 1 group wants to reduce the population to 500 million human slaves (who spend their time as slaves on the coastlines) and have a small elite class who own everything and live on a pristine Earth where the interior of most countries has been returned to nature (This is Group 1's Agenda 21. The agenda for the 21st century).
The other group may appear to be human but do not think as humans (they maybe clones or possessed by 'Walk-ins' or Archons). This group wants to eradicate humans and turn the Earth into a radioactive wasteland with some type of artificial life forms being on Earth. (This is Group 2's Agenda 21. The agenda for the 21st century).
So both groups appear to be acting as 1 group at the moment in the lowering of the population except if you're in Group 1, things like the use of depleted uranium weapons (which they said they would never use as they would turn the Earth into a radioactive wasteland), Fukushima, the gulf oil crisis, fracking, some of the geo-engineering stuff that ruins the Earth, doesn't make much sense to you as this goes against Group 1's Agenda 21.
So, it's Group 2's Agenda 21 that's being implemented and everyone in Group 1 will be taken out with everyone else.
A very small part of the evidence is in the NASA war document
Here's the way I see it at the moment, There are 2 elite groups. 1 group wants to reduce the population to 500 million human slaves (who spend their time as slaves on the coastlines) and have a small elite class who own everything and live on a pristine Earth where the interior of most countries has been returned to nature (This is Group 1's Agenda 21. The agenda for the 21st century).
The other group may appear to be human but do not think as humans (they maybe clones or possessed by 'Walk-ins' or Archons). This group wants to eradicate humans and turn the Earth into a radioactive wasteland with some type of artificial life forms being on Earth. (This is Group 2's Agenda 21. The agenda for the 21st century).
So both groups appear to be acting as 1 group at the moment in the lowering of the population except if you're in Group 1, things like the use of depleted uranium weapons (which they said they would never use as they would turn the Earth into a radioactive wasteland), Fukushima, the gulf oil crisis, fracking, some of the geo-engineering stuff that ruins the Earth, doesn't make much sense to you as this goes against Group 1's Agenda 21.
So, it's Group 2's Agenda 21 that's being implemented and everyone in Group 1 will be taken out with everyone else.
A very small part of the evidence is in the NASA war document
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Oops, hands up on the methane Ed033. We live and learn.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
29 Oct 2014 18:23:27
Given that we're surrounded by main stream media bs everyday, and have gone through indoctrination education systems as well then naturally people are going to have misconceptions about things, particularly in areas of science. The fact people are coming to this website shows maybe they are starting to see through the main stream bs. Then should we not encourage them to take the next step as opposed to ridiculing them because they have incorrect ideas due to main stream indoctrination?
Kim Philby
Given that we're surrounded by main stream media bs everyday, and have gone through indoctrination education systems as well then naturally people are going to have misconceptions about things, particularly in areas of science. The fact people are coming to this website shows maybe they are starting to see through the main stream bs. Then should we not encourage them to take the next step as opposed to ridiculing them because they have incorrect ideas due to main stream indoctrination?
Kim Philby
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Obtaining esoteric information often leads to a inflated ego, either way yes we should guide each other through thus journey, either way I feel over population is as huge issue, clean technology isn't being shared so ythe expanding pollution is a massive issue
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0