Khakipillowslip’s profile

24 Oct 2014 13:46:21
Supasub is right, we usually keep tabs on each other. You probably have submarines in Russian waters.

Knowing Vladimir he is always up to something. I have seen claims he wants to restore Russia's birders to 1917, this includes the Baltic republics including Finland.

Kim Philby

There is often a Russian sub sitting in the english channel on the sea bed off the coast of portland, Dorset. They will clock on and off with a British sub that will be often fairly close to it. They will even introduce who the next sub will be and I think the captains name when they change over. It's probably a fairly routine thing but the press get hold of these things and bring it up when it's probably a lot more or a regular and

Took the words from my mouth! There are no sides on Earth. Not since Saddam went. Power is central and the kansas city shuffle is war.

Why world China or Russia not Grab Snowden with open arms if there was any sort of opposition, even knowing I think this whole opp is to keep real news of our screens like benghazi, but now we have a royal baby, so hold the PRESS, the whole world has been waiting for this great news.

Murp

On a good note the Syrian government killed many (western funded)terrorists on the big day Mr Snowden gave us his great insight, who would have thought that our governments would be spying on us eh, caught me out.

murp

Guess what? CIA, MOSSAD, MI6, SSB are the same agency at the top.
there is and has never been two sides.

only you are progammed to think this way.
Otherwise Mr Snowden would have been snapped up for his so called good info, pmsl.

what a world we live in eh!
Murp

Not far fetched at all, the cold war saw a lot of psy ops going on and black projects have billions ploughed into them! A strong telekinetic person can stop a heart. Project mkultra is said 2 have psychics in abundance as sleeper cells.

Firstly, thanks guys, you've all been awesome.
My Mrs has already appealed the dismissal and it was refused. She was dismissed for gross misconduct after a couple of tweets regarding how frustrated she was at work. These were in Dec last year and the staff who squealed had been involved a few months earlier in their lover being dismissed for being drunk at work. My wife was whistle-blower for that. It gets complicated, but this was basically revenge. Basically, there's no chance of a reinstatement.
The benefits thing grates on me. She very reluctantly applied for them as we've run out of things that we can car-boot to make up the shortfall. To be told no due to not enough contributions is the singularly most frustrating thing, when you can turn up as an asylum seeker, get granted benefits, it's irritating to say the least.

The Benefits System really sets my teeth on edge and hope your Wife gets it all sorted soon.

You should appeal the decision through your local Citizens Advice or usually your Council will offer some kind of Money Matters service.

I would also take advice on why she had to leave her previous employment, you cannot let bullies win. Bullies are often blissfully unaware of their own shameful abusive behaviour and will probably move onto someone else. She could have a case for some kind of constructive dismissal. ~ Mrs E

Terrible that Khakipillowslip, my wife had similar hoops to jump in to, I urge anyone who is unsure about anything, the c.a.b is the best place to go to, the sly tories have cut funding to them so it will be near impossible to get sound advice for our benefit, that's a good idea ed about the tax credits with something like ebay.

You can ask them to review the situation, and you can check your own contribution record through the hmrc site and calculate yourself. But as you say if your partner was working 40-48 hrs per week they would have been making a contribution even on or near minimum wage they would have definitely paid some, unless the employer was paying cash in hand and there was no contribution recorded or n.i. paid via paye.

Supasub

I think y'all doing a disservice to osama the man had a burning hatred of america and now he's 'dead' your taking all the credit away from him shame on all of you, can't radical islamists avenge their millions of dead brothers and sisters and ascend to paradise without nutters like yourselves pissing on their bonfire :D

SM they don't care who they killed it was what they wanted to destroy & how they wanted to fortify there grip on mankind!

Rise & Shine

A don't get it if 9/11 was faked why would america kill their own people that were in the towers

You just hit the nail on the head MrTrotskyGhost. Ryan.

The reason they didn't use real planes was that if they did, there would have been videos showing a plane hitting the building then crumpling then falling to the ground, a bit like a fly hitting a wall.
As for releasing the discovery of landing gear. well we're not discussing Boston at the moment are we.

MrTrotskysGhost

Ok cool, appreciate the replays. Still a little confused as to why though? Would it not be easier to just actually crash the planes?

I believe it is a massive cover up 100% no doubt in me.

Jimbo

Just to add insult to injury we are expected to believe that not one but four airliners crashed and vaporised in one morning. Do you really think Flight 93 hit the ground in Shanksville and vaporised? The crater we were shown has been there for decades. There was no debris consistent with a large aircraft. No matter how hard it hits the ground it cannot simply be swallowed up by the earth and disappear.

And AA77 crashed into the Pentagon and vaporised too? The one place that was literally littered with CCTV cameras and it couldn't show one image of an airliner hitting the building. The exit hole was 9 feet in diameter. And the entry hole was similar in dimensions before the outer wall collapsed.

So for the first time in history three steel framed buildings collapsed at almost freefall speed (and mostly disappeared) due to fire. And four airliners crashed and vaporised.

They think we are all completely stupid and for twelve years they've been getting away with it.

Ryan.

Do you honestly believe that they didn't crash the planes? Surly it would be far easier to get someone to crash the planes into the towers than put a hologram up and get rid of the planes anyway?

{Ed033's Note - The first thing to do is stop thinking and start looking at the 2nd alleged plane that flew into the tower. Planes don't melt into buildings and when they have been totally absorbed into the building, then burst into flames. That's what we were shown on tv/video.

If it was a plane, then the plane would have broke up on impact (that's not what we saw), so something else happened, and we don't know exactly what.

I think the real planes are sitting in the Atlantic ocean.

JK92