Rian’s profile

10 Nov 2017 09:07:06
meant to say grandson.

09 Nov 2017 21:55:23
Are you referring to the claim that he was the illegitimate son of a Rothschild?

07 Nov 2017 16:54:16
What's more interesting about Hitler, is his real name is Adolf Schicklgruber. You should look that up, as it was my Grandfather who told me about it when I was 5 years old (I'm 28 now)

12 Oct 2017 08:38:56
This doesn't even surprise me, nothing does these days. The unfortunate part is people tend to believe what the media feeds them.

10 Oct 2017 22:18:48
Oh now you have me thinking mate.

06 Oct 2017 01:26:45
Yes agree it's deffently a falsy lol
They're getting so common these days, we may as well have a new nickname for them.

05 Oct 2017 16:04:12
So a false flag isn't a hoax
A hoax never happened
A false flag means there's a deeper agenda.
Is that basically everyone's take on a false flag?

05 Oct 2017 11:27:15
Yeah 100% agree, saw a video from the scene that clearly shows muzzle flashes coming from a very low level, compared to crime scene photos the next day that show the two smashed windows quiet high up, i find that quiet strange, but then again it could be the angle the video was taken from?

secondly his character references from the people who know him seem to show a quiet honest hard working "straight" forward guy, without prior episodes. Now i would think that if it was a false flag they would choose someone with a bit of a disreputable or less than squeaky clean record? it all just seems very strange to me.

fair enough i wouldn't know what a mental break down would be like as i have never suffered one nor anyone very close to me.

I find the timing, the amount of people and the way the gun was used to be all very strange, as i have shot weapons including automatics before and it was not easy and at a very short range with a fraction of the bullets, i battled and i'm a very fit person.

05 Oct 2017 11:31:54
Just watched the Video, just validated my idea, i'm still up in the air as to what actually happened, but it is not what they are putting it out as on MSM for sure!

04 Oct 2017 22:58:52
False flag for sure.
We are taking away your guns people
We will have full control of you
Very busy casino with millions of dollars going through It, must have high security, the best security cameras money can Buy, and then someone gets 30 or 40 guns in to a room without being noticed.

04 Oct 2017 23:26:59
Has anyone considered the possibility that Stephen Paddock was the first victim of this terrible atrocity?

06 Jun 2017 19:17:45
Yes, could it be a drill running side by side with a real event?

06 Jun 2017 16:09:35
Since I posted I have seen a better quality image of the man on the ground and he doesn't particularly look like the man changing into the camouflage pants.

03 Mar 2017 02:41:06
Peter Hyatt statement analysis reveals McCann's Embedded Confessions - Part 1 Of 3

13 Oct 2016 21:07:00
Yes the editors have posted about it before.

13 Oct 2016 19:16:22
Anyone heard about the black goo theory and the falklands?

13 Oct 2016 12:50:36
The sovereignty of the Falklands (or the Malvinas if you prefer) is in interesting one to study and certainly not straightforward. There are two claims, Britain's and Argentina's, all other nation's involved in the Falklands history have renounced their claims.

Argentina in it's current state has existed since 1816 but can trace its claim back to 1764. That year a French colony was established on East Falkland, this colony was handed over to Spain in 1766. Spain remained on the island and maintained governance till 1811. In 1816 The United Provinces of South America (a forerunner of the current Argentine Republic) declared independence from Spain and claimed all it's Latin American territories. In the 1820s Argentina made three attempts to colonise the Falklands, the first two failed but the third stuck and a colony was established. This colony was hardly successful and mutiny, murder and American attacks followed. In 1833, a British Ship arrived and ordered the Argentinian governor to leave and took over the governance of the colony.

Britain's claim can be traced back to 1690 (a Brit was the first recorded visitor to the islands) but formally starts in 1766 when a British Colony was established on Saunders Island. In 1776 the British Colony left under pressure from Spain but left a plaque asserting their sovereignty. In 1831 America attacked the Argentinian colony and arrested it's leaders before declaring the islands were free from governance. Argentina responded by sending a garrison to the Falklands in 1832 but the garrison mutinied and murdered it's commander. Britain took advantage of this period to reassert it's claim to the islands, in 1833 a British ship arrived, ordered the Argentinian flag to be lowered, expelled the governor and took over control of the settlement. In 1840 the Falklands were declared a Crown Colony.

The strongest claim to the Falklands is Spain's but Spain gave up its claim long ago. Argentina believes that it inherited sovereignty of the islands when it became independent from Spanish rule but this claim is disputed, partly because there has never been a Latin American population on the islands (the 1828 colony was an economic venture with only a handful of Argentinian 'gauchos' involved) . Britain believes that it's claim predates Argentina's giving it legitimacy. Geographical arguments are largely irrelevant (does Canada have a claim on Alaska because it's closer than mainland USA? ) . The reality is that two countries had competing claims over a deserted island and one of them did better in asserting those claims, the nature of politics then was that gunboat diplomacy was legitimate and the nature of politics now is that the population have the right to self-determination.

13 Oct 2016 13:18:34
Does anyone really want to see Iran develop nuclear weapons? It escalates tensions in a region that's already massively unstable. At the moment Russia and the west are caught up in a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Speaking of which its Britain that's arming the Saudis for their atrocities in Yemen.

Regards the Falklands the islanders themselves voted overwhelmingly to be British. The UN has to recognise the principle of self determination. Also when Britain annexed the islands, Argentina didn't even exist it was still a Spanish colony.

Lastly it was the French supplying the Argentinians. Thatcher threatened the French with invoking the Nato article on 1 member being attacked means the whole alliance pitching in. She also got her good friend Ronald Regan to lean on the French as well. This did cause some consternation at the embassy.

13 Oct 2016 13:42:52
when you look at all types of encounters then the the opposite side has always been armed by so called friendly countries.

look at what's happening now in iraq with isis being armed with american weaponry and equipment but funded by certain countries who are meant to be so called friendly, and in earlier problems in Afghanistan for examples.

the points above point out that's its money over humanity everyday every time.

13 Oct 2016 12:14:45
No problem :) Iv just lost all hope for humanity I can't express how much I hate wars and guns. For people to say the west is one of the most advanced parts of the world so to speak we are still like barbarians killing and looting developing countries, I mean c'mon those parts of the world have got it bad enough leave them alone. The sales of arms from any part of the world Is disgusting just due to the fact that people make a ton of what is essentially blood money.