22 Jan 2022 17:22:06
Maybe you, AngryChef and Ed033, are right. Maybe I am too cynical to think the 'Law' systems in place are not too corrupted by the Satanists to do what it says on the tin, uphold the Law. I still fear they are for show. With Canada, Australia, and many Euro countries all acting from a different hymn sheet I feel these court systems are controlled pantomime. Every fibre wants me to be wrong on that judgement. But the dots don't aligned and add up to anything I can take comfort from.
They have been working on this plan for decades. With their vast network and wealth do you not think they have not played out all scenarios?. And the fact the the LE controlled Blackrock and Vanguard own stakes in EVERYTHING means they have their fingers in all the relative pies to sway things any which way they want, with dirt and skeletons on everyone they wish to control. There is every possibility that Fuellmich, McCullough, Malone, Fauci, Biden, Trump, etc etc are all 'Puppets for the puppeteers' from the same cast/script and part of the well thought out plan which has been acted out numerous times over the centuries with all the resets, given 'them' plenty of practice and foresight into how to deal with any supposed hinderances.
Cynical? Yes. Wrong? I hope so.
bert13’s profile
bert13
Replies to these posts
22 Jan 2022 12:00:10
Makes sense, Angrychef. According to Anna De Buisseret, they may have sent Cease and Desists as part of the criminal notices to loads of people. This is scary for them because they now have to hope that they can be protected by the L.E. to stop it going any further. So they maybe complying with the Cease and Desists at the moment.
Read discussionMakes sense, Angrychef. According to Anna De Buisseret, they may have sent Cease and Desists as part of the criminal notices to loads of people. This is scary for them because they now have to hope that they can be protected by the L.E. to stop it going any further. So they maybe complying with the Cease and Desists at the moment.
22 Jan 2022 09:20:15
I believe the restrictions being lifted has a lot to do with the criminal investigation currently going on for crimes against humanity.
Read discussionI believe the restrictions being lifted has a lot to do with the criminal investigation currently going on for crimes against humanity.
29 Dec 2021 20:34:40
Will the uk continue to use PCR test? It's amazing how much information there is out there for people and they won't believe any of it because the BBC don't report it.
Read discussionWill the uk continue to use PCR test? It's amazing how much information there is out there for people and they won't believe any of it because the BBC don't report it.
29 Dec 2021 19:25:23
Next their'll be saying, "oh, by the way. The vaxxcine is making you ill" when it has all been part of the plan from before the very start. They are Satanist freemason sc*m!
FAUCI VACCINE SAFETY
url:bitchute.com/video/QwFTfWjK0Lla/
Read discussionNext their'll be saying, "oh, by the way. The vaxxcine is making you ill" when it has all been part of the plan from before the very start. They are Satanist freemason sc*m!
FAUCI VACCINE SAFETY
url:bitchute.com/video/QwFTfWjK0Lla/
16 Dec 2021 21:23:58
Thanks Bert although I'm fine and if anything it's all good as it's given both pages a fair bit of traffic.
Read discussionThanks Bert although I'm fine and if anything it's all good as it's given both pages a fair bit of traffic.
09 Dec 2021 13:47:04
Thanks very much for your help Ed32, I will get a read through it after work.
Ed33, my kid is only 6, I've told him repeatedly that if someone trys to injected him at school with anything that he can hit, kick and do whatever he can to stop them and tell them to phone daddy. With him being so young it is always a worry but if he acts like that I'd hope the good nature of people will come through and they will stop.
Read discussionThanks very much for your help Ed32, I will get a read through it after work.
Ed33, my kid is only 6, I've told him repeatedly that if someone trys to injected him at school with anything that he can hit, kick and do whatever he can to stop them and tell them to phone daddy. With him being so young it is always a worry but if he acts like that I'd hope the good nature of people will come through and they will stop.
09 Dec 2021 13:42:30
For those that missed it on here before:
Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11
uksc-2013-0136 judgment
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery".
bailii.org
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
Bell-v-Tavistock Judgment
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency.
NHS Consent to treatment
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (trespass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more.
irishstatutebook.ie
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them.
constitution.congress.gov
Read discussionFor those that missed it on here before:
Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11
uksc-2013-0136 judgment
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery".
bailii.org
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
Bell-v-Tavistock Judgment
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency.
NHS Consent to treatment
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (trespass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more.
irishstatutebook.ie
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them.
constitution.congress.gov
09 Dec 2021 10:10:14
That would be great Ed, tried to find one but I'm rubbish at these sort of things. Your helps is very much appreciated
Read discussionThat would be great Ed, tried to find one but I'm rubbish at these sort of things. Your helps is very much appreciated
09 Dec 2021 12:29:04
Even if you send a letter/notice to the Principal/Headmaster, and then follow up with a phone call to them asking if they received the letter/notice and getting a reassurance from them that under no circumstances is your offspring to be injected with anything; Don't assume that your offspring won't be injected, because it's likely that a group of people will show up at the school, hand a piece of paper to the Principal/Headmaster and then the children will be lined up for jabs.
So in addition to the letter/notice, you'd want a back up plan, such as telling your child to run out of school.
Homeschooling sounds good to me, if possible.
Read discussionEven if you send a letter/notice to the Principal/Headmaster, and then follow up with a phone call to them asking if they received the letter/notice and getting a reassurance from them that under no circumstances is your offspring to be injected with anything; Don't assume that your offspring won't be injected, because it's likely that a group of people will show up at the school, hand a piece of paper to the Principal/Headmaster and then the children will be lined up for jabs.
So in addition to the letter/notice, you'd want a back up plan, such as telling your child to run out of school.
Homeschooling sounds good to me, if possible.
27 Nov 2021 08:32:46
Cheers Ed, anyone on here speak any Dutch able to confirm if anything said was anything to do with covid?
Read discussionCheers Ed, anyone on here speak any Dutch able to confirm if anything said was anything to do with covid?
27 Nov 2021 08:11:51
You should verify that the boy is being removed because the father is covid critical. I read in the comments that this is an old video and not covid related. It's very messed up, but it's possible it may not be exactly what you think it is.
Read discussionYou should verify that the boy is being removed because the father is covid critical. I read in the comments that this is an old video and not covid related. It's very messed up, but it's possible it may not be exactly what you think it is.
22 Nov 2021 20:53:11
Have you giving it a 'try', bert13?
Read discussionHave you giving it a 'try', bert13?
19 Nov 2021 12:54:17
I'd be very interested to hear you share more on this idea Ed032 and also any videos you happen upon that help explain it.
Read discussionI'd be very interested to hear you share more on this idea Ed032 and also any videos you happen upon that help explain it.
21 Nov 2021 16:59:05
Not at all Ed lol I can just abt work my phone, me and technology fell out at school 20 odd years ago and never made up.
Thank you for your reply tho and will look forward to the day the site can host its own videos and I can't work that out either. Cheers
Read discussionNot at all Ed lol I can just abt work my phone, me and technology fell out at school 20 odd years ago and never made up.
Thank you for your reply tho and will look forward to the day the site can host its own videos and I can't work that out either. Cheers
20 Nov 2021 12:13:37
Bert, yeah I'm with you on the possibility of events unfolding as you say but that doesn't mean that we will comply.
100% I will resist by all means available, first legally (using their own maritime law and then common or natural law)followed if needed by physical resistence and I am quite prepared to die before giving in (not saying I want to of course!)
One thing, although I am aware of any and all possibilities I refuse to be in fear of them because that is what they want.
There is a much bigger picture than this transient life we enjoy and something as important as this battle has to be fought to the very end.
Read discussionBert, yeah I'm with you on the possibility of events unfolding as you say but that doesn't mean that we will comply.
100% I will resist by all means available, first legally (using their own maritime law and then common or natural law)followed if needed by physical resistence and I am quite prepared to die before giving in (not saying I want to of course!)
One thing, although I am aware of any and all possibilities I refuse to be in fear of them because that is what they want.
There is a much bigger picture than this transient life we enjoy and something as important as this battle has to be fought to the very end.
20 Nov 2021 09:48:29
Gibraltar 99% fully vaccinated
Covid cases rising
Christmas cancelled
Read discussionGibraltar 99% fully vaccinated
Covid cases rising
Christmas cancelled
20 Nov 2021 08:49:12
TJ70,in my opinion we only have to look round the world at the minute to see that eventually the government is going to make decisions for us, most of the people will even celebrate the fact that they force people to take the jab and say it should have happened earlier.
They will probably even name the day something like Freedom day or similar and tell us this is going to be a day to go down in history as the start of the end of the virus. Only my opinion and hope I'm wrong.
Read discussionTJ70,in my opinion we only have to look round the world at the minute to see that eventually the government is going to make decisions for us, most of the people will even celebrate the fact that they force people to take the jab and say it should have happened earlier.
They will probably even name the day something like Freedom day or similar and tell us this is going to be a day to go down in history as the start of the end of the virus. Only my opinion and hope I'm wrong.
19 Nov 2021 23:17:42
Bert, they can try and make the decision for me, good luck with that :):)
Read discussionBert, they can try and make the decision for me, good luck with that :):)
19 Nov 2021 21:41:16
You would think the fact that they lockdown the unvaxxed, then lockdown everyone else as well, would suggest to people that the vaxx doesn't do anything to help with covid? so why would a 3rd jab help other than to get people to obey and kneel before the tyrannical LE oppressors?
As stated before my dad is in a residential care home where you can not enter without a test/vax, can not work/live without being double/triple jabbed yet they are locked down because of a covid outbreak.
Read discussionYou would think the fact that they lockdown the unvaxxed, then lockdown everyone else as well, would suggest to people that the vaxx doesn't do anything to help with covid? so why would a 3rd jab help other than to get people to obey and kneel before the tyrannical LE oppressors?
As stated before my dad is in a residential care home where you can not enter without a test/vax, can not work/live without being double/triple jabbed yet they are locked down because of a covid outbreak.