07 Mar 2018 00:48:48
Leahy, I remember about 20 odd years ago there was a song always on the radio - I was on the tools at the time so maybe about 2004 - from some teeny bopper band called Busted about being to the year 3000 and nothing's changed but we live underwater.
So yer man the time traveler left 2004 and travelled to the year 3000 where nothing's changed but we live underwater. and I've just BUSTED him! :-D.
Ed007’s profile
Ed007
Published posts and replies
22 Jun 2017 00:47:20
That DUP are getting everywhere!
Read discussionThat DUP are getting everywhere!
04 Mar 2017 17:27:09
Obama calling Michelle, Mikey isn't that strange, my wife's called Jacqueline and everyone calls her Jack because she hates being called Jackie. My old man used to get a bit uncomfortable talking about his son's wife Jack lol It's more than likely just a pet name imo.
Read discussionObama calling Michelle, Mikey isn't that strange, my wife's called Jacqueline and everyone calls her Jack because she hates being called Jackie. My old man used to get a bit uncomfortable talking about his son's wife Jack lol It's more than likely just a pet name imo.
14 Oct 2016 01:53:16
Stars are just like holes in a tent roof is a particular favourite, Rian lol
I'm quite open to all sorts of nonsense I readdon the internet at 2 o'clock in the morning but the flat earth stuff is miles out.
Don't they say that Antartica is the outer edge of earth but that the flat earth goes on indefinitely?
I look on things like the flat earth stuff as a distraction allowed to snowball to get people looking away from real issues and problems. And that's from someone that believes in Heaven and Hell. :-D.
Read discussionStars are just like holes in a tent roof is a particular favourite, Rian lol
I'm quite open to all sorts of nonsense I readdon the internet at 2 o'clock in the morning but the flat earth stuff is miles out.
Don't they say that Antartica is the outer edge of earth but that the flat earth goes on indefinitely?
I look on things like the flat earth stuff as a distraction allowed to snowball to get people looking away from real issues and problems. And that's from someone that believes in Heaven and Hell. :-D.
06 Jul 2016 02:20:56
Hopefully it's third time lucky.
Read discussionHopefully it's third time lucky.
03 May 2016 02:27:14
Southampton87 that has to be one of the most ludicrous things I've ever read on the internet, you can't possibly be serious?
Read discussionSouthampton87 that has to be one of the most ludicrous things I've ever read on the internet, you can't possibly be serious?
10 Mar 2016 02:38:44
The victim was seriously injured and in a stable condition in hospital. What possible injuries could he have received? It was nice of the emergency services to leave the electrics on when there was a fire risk and shut the doors all neat and tidy.
In fact if you read the report the bomb only partially went off, does that van look like it's had a once over with the bomb disposal squad, wouldn't they shut the electrics off?
The bomb was found to have been made of semtex - that's just a blatant lie not worth commenting on.
Read discussionThe victim was seriously injured and in a stable condition in hospital. What possible injuries could he have received? It was nice of the emergency services to leave the electrics on when there was a fire risk and shut the doors all neat and tidy.
In fact if you read the report the bomb only partially went off, does that van look like it's had a once over with the bomb disposal squad, wouldn't they shut the electrics off?
The bomb was found to have been made of semtex - that's just a blatant lie not worth commenting on.
08 Mar 2016 09:16:10
There's something not right here, we're meant to believe Muslim terrorists can blow up planes with a shoe or their under-pants but the IRA can't knock out any glass or the electrics with a bomb? It's not even bust a tyre. It reminds me more of my Mrs' parking.
goo.gl/Df7Xh9
18 Dec 2015 02:40:09
I've got a good book about this on a pdf that I'll dig out.
Read discussionI've got a good book about this on a pdf that I'll dig out.
10 Oct 2015 01:47:10
I battled through about half of Trance Formation of America, and it was a battle, but I had to stop because by that time I was just sitting laughing at it and reading snippets of it out to my wife to lampoon it. It was like a bad taste comedy trying to be more shocking than the previous scene and everything getting more sinister and even more outrageous as it goes on. It's like a who's who of pop culture.
To be honest I would put it in the category of something people can use to ridicule people like us that like to look at everything from a different angle.
Read discussionI battled through about half of Trance Formation of America, and it was a battle, but I had to stop because by that time I was just sitting laughing at it and reading snippets of it out to my wife to lampoon it. It was like a bad taste comedy trying to be more shocking than the previous scene and everything getting more sinister and even more outrageous as it goes on. It's like a who's who of pop culture.
To be honest I would put it in the category of something people can use to ridicule people like us that like to look at everything from a different angle.
Here's a link to a site with the pic:
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/s3790142.shtml
And an article from an Albuquerque newspaper:
albuquerque.suntimes.com/albq-news/7/143/120823/un-humvees-seen-on-i-25-american-produced-likely-for-mali-peacekeeping-mission
Read discussionhttp://www.kob.com/article/stories/s3790142.shtml
And an article from an Albuquerque newspaper:
albuquerque.suntimes.com/albq-news/7/143/120823/un-humvees-seen-on-i-25-american-produced-likely-for-mali-peacekeeping-mission
Just as a follow on but does this driver look like he is ‘totally unresponsive’ as Roddy describes?
Now let’s look at some of those eyewitness statements.
When the incident initially happened it was reported that the ‘Lorry out of control for 300 metres, mounted pavement at 70mph’ here and ‘careered out of control at speed’ here, not to mention ‘There was a bin lorry screaming up the road at a crazy speed, and he carried on driving until it hit the hotel.’ as was reported here.
Sounds like absolute carnage!
Yet on Saturday 14th February we have this report clearly stating:
EXAMINATION OF ON-BOARD MONITORING EQUIPIMENT SHOWED THAT IT TRAVELLED JUST OVER 20 MPH AS THE TRAGEDY UNFOLDED.
That seems to totally contradict what was reported at the time, why did the MSM need to tell so many lies about what happened and why does the official version of events just not make any sense when you look closer at it?
It's cute that people are clicking disagree but nobody wants to try and answer any questions I'm asking in a civil manner. I'm loving the personal abuse though, it shows that some people are worried.
I wonder how many people have walked along Queen Street and noticed that all the bins, traffic lights etc are all weather beaten and old looking, are we meant to believe that the used the original smashed poles and bins which miraculously have all been put EXACTLY (to the millimetre) in the same spot as they were with no visible signs of them being replaced or been moved since they were initially fitted years ago. Why is there no damage to the pavements where these were ripped from the ground.
It's as if they were never hit by a bin lorry that was careering out of control at 70 mph, in fact there is no physical evidence on Queen St to suggest that a bin lorry careered out of control at 70 mph knocking pedestrians, poles, traffic lights and bins out of it's path as it screamed up the road at crazy speed.
Wouldn't the poles traffic lights are on stop a vehicle travelling at 20 mph that the on-board monitoring equipment has now proven the bin lorry was travelling at?
Read discussionNow let’s look at some of those eyewitness statements.
When the incident initially happened it was reported that the ‘Lorry out of control for 300 metres, mounted pavement at 70mph’ here and ‘careered out of control at speed’ here, not to mention ‘There was a bin lorry screaming up the road at a crazy speed, and he carried on driving until it hit the hotel.’ as was reported here.
Sounds like absolute carnage!
Yet on Saturday 14th February we have this report clearly stating:
EXAMINATION OF ON-BOARD MONITORING EQUIPIMENT SHOWED THAT IT TRAVELLED JUST OVER 20 MPH AS THE TRAGEDY UNFOLDED.
That seems to totally contradict what was reported at the time, why did the MSM need to tell so many lies about what happened and why does the official version of events just not make any sense when you look closer at it?
It's cute that people are clicking disagree but nobody wants to try and answer any questions I'm asking in a civil manner. I'm loving the personal abuse though, it shows that some people are worried.
I wonder how many people have walked along Queen Street and noticed that all the bins, traffic lights etc are all weather beaten and old looking, are we meant to believe that the used the original smashed poles and bins which miraculously have all been put EXACTLY (to the millimetre) in the same spot as they were with no visible signs of them being replaced or been moved since they were initially fitted years ago. Why is there no damage to the pavements where these were ripped from the ground.
It's as if they were never hit by a bin lorry that was careering out of control at 70 mph, in fact there is no physical evidence on Queen St to suggest that a bin lorry careered out of control at 70 mph knocking pedestrians, poles, traffic lights and bins out of it's path as it screamed up the road at crazy speed.
Wouldn't the poles traffic lights are on stop a vehicle travelling at 20 mph that the on-board monitoring equipment has now proven the bin lorry was travelling at?
23 Nov 2014 03:35:04
{Ed007's Note - As a follow up to what I posted above and Kim saying she was surprised the two Michaels weren't shot dead at the scene by the armed 'police', I had a snoop about and found this report from during their trial.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/lee-rigby-murder-trial-police-reveal-dramatic-new-images-and-footage-of-the-moments-two-suspects-are-arrested-8981052.html
I'm going to reprint some parts of the report and point out the glaring errors.
"They were released as a police markswoman told jurors at the Old Bailey that she feared for her life when she was left defenceless as the alleged killer of Fusilier Lee Rigby charged her car waving a machete.
The officer known only as D49 and the driver of a three-strong armed response unit, struggled to pull her gun out of a holster as Michael Adebolajo sprinted towards her car, the court heard. "
So we are to believe that highly trained police officers who we are supposed to trust with protecting us panicked so much she struggled to get her gun out her holster when her and 2 other colleagues were in immediate danger? Note the word machete is used here.
"CCTV footage shown in court showed a machete-wielding man get to within a few feet of D49's car door before he was thrown thrown into the air with the impact of a shot from her colleague sitting in the back seat of the car. "
Now we have a highly trained police officer who can't get her gun out of the holster and her colleague in the back failed to shoot dead from "within a few feet" a man posing that much of a danger her highly trained colleague was so panic-stricken she couldn't get her own gun out it's holster. It's beyond parody, it would be far fetched for a film script so why do people believe it actually happened?
"I saw a flash to my right, when I looked I saw a black male running at me waving both hands up in the air with a chopping motion, " said D49 in a statement read to the court. "I instantly thought he is going to kill me. I could not immediately pull out my Glock… I could see the look in the suspect's eyes. They were so wide I could see the whites of them. "
First off, she doesn't mention the machete, not a big deal but wouldn't a policewomen's statement be more thorough? Perhaps not as she then says "waving both hands up in the air with a chopping motion" still no mention of any machete and if you imagine what she's describing it sounds more like rave dancing than threatening behaviour, remember at this point they have no idea what's occurred. He could have been a witness in a blind panic? D49 is so close to the disco dancing black male she can see the whites of his eyes but her colleague, a highly trained police officer can't/won't shoot him dead?
Wouldn't a lawyer question what hand the machete was in etc. when the suspect was shot, to build up an exact picture of what happened and forensic evidence? You would think so BUT note the part "said D49 in a statement read to the court", D49 wasn't giving evidence, her statement was only read out in court and so she was never cross-examined, she was never there in person.
"The officer in the back of the car, E48, told the court yesterday of his decision to shoot Mr Adebolajo as he charged towards the car. Speaking from behind a screen, he told the court that D49 was "defenceless, she had a pane of glass to protect herself".
Why was E48 behind a screen, why wasn't his statement just read out like his poor little defenceless colleague, who although she was carrying a Glock "only had a pane of glass to protect herself", hardly defenceless is it?
"The second he started sprinting at us still in possession of that knife I made the decision to fire and until he fell away from the vehicle I was still in the frame of mind, he said. "
All through this story, this blade went from being a meat cleaver to a machete and now a knife! I know it's a small point (small point/knife? Get it lol) but shouldn't the police know the difference, or better still wouldn't the weapons be there as evidence? It's not mentioned in this article but I'm sure I read somewhere that they were only shown pictures of "blood soaked weapons".
"It felt like everything went in slow motion, " she said in her statement. "I thought 'Oh my God, he is going to shoot me'. I feared for my life. "
This is good old D49's statement being read out again as evidence in a murder trial the eyes of the world are looking at. This is her talking about the SECOND Michael, so again this highly trained police officer has panicked when faced with danger, doesn't she play the damsel in distress so well? How the hell did her unit ever manage the 35 out of 35 shooting to kills ratio with this panic merchant in the ranks? That's twice in one day she's feared for her life, the poor lass nerves must be shattered!
"Mr Adebolajo told a paramedic who treated him that he believed in sharia law and "should be allowed to have as many women as he wanted, " the court was told yesterday. He kept repeating that British soldiers were raping and killing women in Afghanistan on his way to hospital, according to a statement by paramedic William Woolston. "
So even the paramedics don't get a day off work and claiming court expenses for it as William Woolston only had his statement read out. It must be the truth then eh? It's reported elsewhere that Adebolajo also told Woolston that Allah was his next of kin. So that's the 2 Michaels both had poor little D49 in fear of her life and now one of them is saying he "should be allowed to have as many women as he wanted".
21 Nov 2014 02:54:56
For anyone interested Chris Spivey put a new article up the other day regarding the Woolwhich/Lee Rigby false flag operation.
http://www.chrisspivey.org/category/woolwichlee-rigby/
The part where Nick Kollerstrom (any opinion on/knowledge of him Ed033?) has tried and failed to find Lee James McClure, Rigby's real name, birth certificate is to me a very important point in the whole con if you've been following it, how can somebody that never existed be killed?
17 Nov 2014 19:53:09
If anyone's looking for something to read here's 4 free books to download that might be of interest. I've not started reading them myself so if they're muck don't be blaming me :)
http://www.martinkeerns.wordpress.com/2014/11/16/my-first-four-pieces-of-work/
04 Nov 2014 22:56:26
Chris Spivey has written a new article updating his investigation into the Woolwich/Lee Rigby false flag operation.
www.chrisspivey.org/connecting-the-woolwich-dots/
Is Leon Brittan the next Jimmy Savile, Franky?Drag this out until he dies from a 'natural' heart attack/stroke then pile as much blame as possible on him. The sheeple will then think that's the end of it, the baddies have been caught. Not that Savile was a patsy or scapegoat but the way it's being made out he worked alone and nobody knew what he was up to.
You can blame the dead for anything, they're not going to answer anything are they.
Read discussionYou can blame the dead for anything, they're not going to answer anything are they.
A word of warning before you all start fawning over ED 001, he is sublimanally brainwashing you all to accept males and females should be seen as one sexually. Take ED and turn it 90 degrees clockwise to look like eyes and a jaw/chin, the E at 90 degrees represents the McDonalds Illuminati emblem, the D obviously represents Death. Then place the 00 side by side underneath to represent the woman's breasts, the the life/energy givers. Finally turn the 1 90 degrees to represent the male penis, symbolizing male fertility, the unicorn's horn.
This kind of shape.
M
U
OO
1
Read discussionThis kind of shape.
M
U
OO
1
Have you never heard of the false Paul McCartney stories? Total BS in my opinion but there's a documentary worth watching just for the sheer entertainment value and the work the guys have done to piece it all together. The Last Will and Testament of Georg Harrison.
Read discussion