30 Jan 2020 00:14:55 I got to that point around 2 months ago. Then just let go of everything I have 'been taught' and started looking for myself. Very strangely everything, on the whole, seem to make, much more sense (or what I knew made more nonsense)
I was one of the few that asked you to start the 'Space and Astrophysics' page. I can't bring myself to study that at this time. Too many things I have seen make that seem pointless until other questions are answered. Consequently, my humble book collection has taken a very, vivid turn in direction.
30 Jan 2020 00:00:31 How hard would it be to change the history of a nation?
In today's age, I would say quite hard what, with social media, the internet and general connectivity to everything.
50-100 years ago is a whole, other matter and the further you go back, even easier to achieve. It does make you think. Well, at least it does, me. It was different back then.
Sadly, the Fomenko books are not something you can read in 20-30min sections. It needs large chunks of time to digest/ study/ research, to understand on the level that I like to understand. Hopefully I can do that soon. It does all seem linked to a few of your recent post with tartarian/ tartary history which appears to be unwanted parts that don't comply with the MSBS.
30 Jan 2020 00:02:29 Not seen the 1962 footage before, is that for real? . haha did the guy who was supposed to be the 'face on the moon', forget to come to work that day?
29 Jan 2020 19:54:54 The fact that, they have to 'Photoshop' the Earth suggest to me that it is not just humans they can not get through the VA belts/ Dome? / Firmament? it is satellites too as why wouldn't they have taken a photo of the Earth in full view?
29 Jan 2020 08:27:42 As far as I am concerned there is no new info here that I did not already know. There is nothing that proves anything. I did like how they kept the same clouds for different times of day, on each perfect sphere Earth picture, when explaining a geostationary orbit. Only to later go on to explain how the Earth isn't a perfect sphere.
28 Jan 2020 21:46:13 "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing." - Plato.
It's amazing how many like-minded people that wrongly tell me what I am trying to portrait, because they being conspiratorial too, know it all already. And miss what I am trying to tell them. Again falling back on the mainstream BS
The people that were awakened are falling back asleep. Are they not? .
28 Jan 2020 20:33:34 This was deleted pretty quick from the FE group on GAB. I don't know why because I haven't the energy to check right now. Can I post it here to remind me? .
Truth hides from no questions. So why delete? I will try and look tomorrow.
26 Jan 2020 16:19:13 Maybe edit that to say Batman instead then, Ed? . Although I was only stating a fact unlike Pope who was predicting the inevitable.
This is why I was (or rather wasn't) saying what I did on another post on here the other day.
26 Jan 2020 09:20:30 Strangely enough I only found out about 'The Crown' of 'The City of London', last week whilst researching Fomenko related 'history'.
25 Jan 2020 21:42:19 No, mate not all. Sorry if I gave that impression. Just made me feel sick because watching this version, the video clips from WW2 made a lot more sense. I guess I'm gibbering a bit because I feel an overwhelming sense of hopelessness towards the lack of ability to be able to change anything, if these things are true. And if true, I guess that's the point.
25 Jan 2020 21:55:24 It's still below that magic barrier that only 60's tech can get through, Ed. The James Webb telescope is ( I think) supposed to be set in an Earth orbit of 1-1.5 million miles. So a Moon, Earth picture is possible. Maybe their CGI department aren't convincing enough, which is what's causing the delay.
JWT and Artemis are, as I have said before, going to be intriguing.
25 Jan 2020 21:24:23 I haven't listened to the post above this. I will try to later (probably fall asleep to it) .
These are the same "proofs" used for flat earth. I haven't seen any counter arguments disproving these experiments, yet. Are there any? .
They (the experiments) seem to prove no Earth movement. This still has no preference towards a flat or globe Earth. I still struggle with Airey's failure. I understand what is being said, it's not something I know about so thinking and visualising multiple elements at once, for me, takes time for me to make an opinion, so I know it isn't a parrot-effect.
The problem for me, is that everyone seems to ignore (but still use as proof for a globe) is all the NASA photoshop Earth pictures. I mean build a camera/ satellite/ (balloon? ) specifically for that purpose, a full view of the amazing planet, Earth. I just can't understand why they haven't. unless there is some sort of barrier/ waters/ radiation that is preventing it.
25 Jan 2020 21:02:07 Still processing, Ed. An already complex subject twisted on its head. I don't want to portray myself as something I don't want to be, by questioning something that isn't supposed to be questioned. Which is how things appear to be. I don't know what to think really. Shocked.
If there is something in particular from WW2 or the documentary you would like me to share my opinion on, I will do my best to oblige.
24 Jan 2020 15:39:36 I thought it would be a lot harder passing behind foreground objects, but maybe not? . I not that familiar with AAA or programs like that. So I don't know.
Southern Monkey · 30 Jan 2020 06:26