24 Jan 2020 19:19:35
Malcom Bowden on Geocentrism - The Globe Earth is at the centre of the Universe.
25 Jan 2020 21:24:23
I haven\'t listened to the post above this. I will try to later (probably fall asleep to it) .
These are the same \"proofs\" used for flat earth. I haven\'t seen any counter arguments disproving these experiments, yet. Are there any? .
They (the experiments) seem to prove no Earth movement. This still has no preference towards a flat or globe Earth. I still struggle with Airey\'s failure. I understand what is being said, it\'s not something I know about so thinking and visualising multiple elements at once, for me, takes time for me to make an opinion, so I know it isn\'t a parrot-effect.
The problem for me, is that everyone seems to ignore (but still use as proof for a globe) is all the NASA photoshop Earth pictures. I mean build a camera/ satellite/ (balloon? ) specifically for that purpose, a full view of the amazing planet, Earth. I just can\'t understand why they haven\'t. unless there is some sort of barrier/ waters/ radiation that is preventing it.
I haven\'t listened to the post above this. I will try to later (probably fall asleep to it) .
These are the same \"proofs\" used for flat earth. I haven\'t seen any counter arguments disproving these experiments, yet. Are there any? .
They (the experiments) seem to prove no Earth movement. This still has no preference towards a flat or globe Earth. I still struggle with Airey\'s failure. I understand what is being said, it\'s not something I know about so thinking and visualising multiple elements at once, for me, takes time for me to make an opinion, so I know it isn\'t a parrot-effect.
The problem for me, is that everyone seems to ignore (but still use as proof for a globe) is all the NASA photoshop Earth pictures. I mean build a camera/ satellite/ (balloon? ) specifically for that purpose, a full view of the amazing planet, Earth. I just can\'t understand why they haven\'t. unless there is some sort of barrier/ waters/ radiation that is preventing it.
{Ed033\'s Note - Yes, it seems definite that the Earth is fixed and non rotating, but the exact shape is unknown.
Why don\'t they turn the Hubble Telescope (347 miles away from Earth) around towards Earth so we can have a look?
Why don\'t they turn the Hubble Telescope (347 miles away from Earth) around towards Earth so we can have a look?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
25 Jan 2020 21:55:24
It\'s still below that magic barrier that only 60\'s tech can get through, Ed. The James Webb telescope is ( I think) supposed to be set in an Earth orbit of 1-1.5 million miles. So a Moon, Earth picture is possible. Maybe their CGI department aren\'t convincing enough, which is what\'s causing the delay.
JWT and Artemis are, as I have said before, going to be intriguing.
It\'s still below that magic barrier that only 60\'s tech can get through, Ed. The James Webb telescope is ( I think) supposed to be set in an Earth orbit of 1-1.5 million miles. So a Moon, Earth picture is possible. Maybe their CGI department aren\'t convincing enough, which is what\'s causing the delay.
JWT and Artemis are, as I have said before, going to be intriguing.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0