17 Mar 2022 10:25:22
So if you know what it isn't, do you know what it is?
Toots’s profile
Toots
Published posts and replies
14 Mar 2022 22:13:09
Not entirely sure what the video is suggesting..
Is it possible that the anomalies are no more than the magnification and focussing of the camera capturing the extreme change in pressures and heat around an object as it enters and exits the periphery of the light source?
Read discussionNot entirely sure what the video is suggesting..
Is it possible that the anomalies are no more than the magnification and focussing of the camera capturing the extreme change in pressures and heat around an object as it enters and exits the periphery of the light source?
04 Mar 2022 02:18:27
I'm really at odds with the sovereign stuff. I'm aware that my knowledge on the subject is severely lacking and could lead to some embarrassment.
I'm not the best with words or arguments and stating my case, so this is likely to be perceived as no more than the ramblings of an ignorant, intolerant man.
In my opinion, the guidance and encouragement to empower ones sovereignty that Peter Stone and others like him are sharing, is fantasy and also dangerous.
Much of their talk is about contracts and your right not to be governed or enter in to contracts, particularly from entities that possess forms of authority.
Most of what i have been able to watch or listen to (i'll be honest is becoming more difficult as its triggering a gut instinct that's not complimentary) usually centres around some sort of conflict where licences, fines, demands and so on are made.
For the best part, i can only see their approach as being confusing to any person / agency / organisation imposing on their "sovereignty" but ultimately 99.9% of the time, only one side will win.
Peter et al, enter in to all sorts of contracts every day of the week, which according to them they don't need to as things just don't apply to them.
Well, i have to say, its total nonsense. Unless these folk are 100% self sufficient, their sovereignty is total horse shit.
I'm trying to keep it brief and workable in my own tiny mind, but lets take tax as an example. Apparently we do not have to accept taxation...well, there are taxes you can do nothing about. You can't refuse to pay VAT on the goods you buy in a supermarket, its quite simple, no payment, no goods. Think of all the things these people say and then think of how many things they must do daily, that contradict their beliefs.
Its all selective, they're in one world for one moment, then another world when it suits them for whatever cause or reason.
For some of the examples i have seen, they are pouncing on procedural errors to provide the ammunition to fight a fine or licence or whatever..Thats not sovereignty, its just being bloody clever and a stickler for doing things right.
I haven't looked hard, which could be my undoing, but there aren't many people who use their sovereignty that have taken on the establishment(s) and won.
Does Peter have a mortgage, a driving licence, does he pay council tax, income tax, VAT?
The platforms he uses to inform people are subject to rules and licencing. The means to be able to produce his material are all provided by companies which he cannot control and almost definitely pays for, tax included.
I wonder if he pays his water bill? Does he refuse to pay for surface water drainage? (which is total robbery)...i could go on and on.
If Peter really lived his sovereign life, he wouldn't have time to make videos or documents to post on his website as his fight is just too big and on too many fronts.
He's getting shafted left right and centre, just like the rest of us.
Being sovereign can only exist inside your mind and your own four walls. Outside of that and in daily life, its nothing, no meaning and no understanding by the vast majority.
Spill my pint, i aint going to wait for you to invoke your sovereignty by asking questions three times in order to dodge what is now owed. If a replacement isn't offered quickly, you'll get knocked out...Then presumably, you'd want a uniformed authority to uphold the law (the law you do not subscribe to) and arrest me for assault, then hopefully prosecuted and punished in a court by an authority which you say has no power to do so....See the problem here??
Amongst all this, its very likely Peter and co are renumerated for the effort of telling us total, unworkable crap. If there is an income, no matter how small or large, it may include monies from the vulnerable and easily led...
Sadly, i have met quite a few people who feel the system / society has let them down and then find alternative views through books, websites etc, then take that information to be absolute truth.
I also know others, including two people i consider friends that have a mental illness and swallow this stuff hook line and sinker. I sincerely hope they never touch upon the TV licence example....
So now we have sovereign people with no morals. Makes them no better than those they use as examples.
I think you can easily see i have developed a deep mistrust in the sovereign way and particularly in Peter Stone.
Again, in my opinion, Peter Stone and those like him are dangerous. Anyone going down this rabbit hole needs their head examining.
Read discussionI'm really at odds with the sovereign stuff. I'm aware that my knowledge on the subject is severely lacking and could lead to some embarrassment.
I'm not the best with words or arguments and stating my case, so this is likely to be perceived as no more than the ramblings of an ignorant, intolerant man.
In my opinion, the guidance and encouragement to empower ones sovereignty that Peter Stone and others like him are sharing, is fantasy and also dangerous.
Much of their talk is about contracts and your right not to be governed or enter in to contracts, particularly from entities that possess forms of authority.
Most of what i have been able to watch or listen to (i'll be honest is becoming more difficult as its triggering a gut instinct that's not complimentary) usually centres around some sort of conflict where licences, fines, demands and so on are made.
For the best part, i can only see their approach as being confusing to any person / agency / organisation imposing on their "sovereignty" but ultimately 99.9% of the time, only one side will win.
Peter et al, enter in to all sorts of contracts every day of the week, which according to them they don't need to as things just don't apply to them.
Well, i have to say, its total nonsense. Unless these folk are 100% self sufficient, their sovereignty is total horse shit.
I'm trying to keep it brief and workable in my own tiny mind, but lets take tax as an example. Apparently we do not have to accept taxation...well, there are taxes you can do nothing about. You can't refuse to pay VAT on the goods you buy in a supermarket, its quite simple, no payment, no goods. Think of all the things these people say and then think of how many things they must do daily, that contradict their beliefs.
Its all selective, they're in one world for one moment, then another world when it suits them for whatever cause or reason.
For some of the examples i have seen, they are pouncing on procedural errors to provide the ammunition to fight a fine or licence or whatever..Thats not sovereignty, its just being bloody clever and a stickler for doing things right.
I haven't looked hard, which could be my undoing, but there aren't many people who use their sovereignty that have taken on the establishment(s) and won.
Does Peter have a mortgage, a driving licence, does he pay council tax, income tax, VAT?
The platforms he uses to inform people are subject to rules and licencing. The means to be able to produce his material are all provided by companies which he cannot control and almost definitely pays for, tax included.
I wonder if he pays his water bill? Does he refuse to pay for surface water drainage? (which is total robbery)...i could go on and on.
If Peter really lived his sovereign life, he wouldn't have time to make videos or documents to post on his website as his fight is just too big and on too many fronts.
He's getting shafted left right and centre, just like the rest of us.
Being sovereign can only exist inside your mind and your own four walls. Outside of that and in daily life, its nothing, no meaning and no understanding by the vast majority.
Spill my pint, i aint going to wait for you to invoke your sovereignty by asking questions three times in order to dodge what is now owed. If a replacement isn't offered quickly, you'll get knocked out...Then presumably, you'd want a uniformed authority to uphold the law (the law you do not subscribe to) and arrest me for assault, then hopefully prosecuted and punished in a court by an authority which you say has no power to do so....See the problem here??
Amongst all this, its very likely Peter and co are renumerated for the effort of telling us total, unworkable crap. If there is an income, no matter how small or large, it may include monies from the vulnerable and easily led...
Sadly, i have met quite a few people who feel the system / society has let them down and then find alternative views through books, websites etc, then take that information to be absolute truth.
I also know others, including two people i consider friends that have a mental illness and swallow this stuff hook line and sinker. I sincerely hope they never touch upon the TV licence example....
So now we have sovereign people with no morals. Makes them no better than those they use as examples.
I think you can easily see i have developed a deep mistrust in the sovereign way and particularly in Peter Stone.
Again, in my opinion, Peter Stone and those like him are dangerous. Anyone going down this rabbit hole needs their head examining.
22 Jan 2022 02:49:45
Thought provoking and does make evolution rather flakey. However, his arguments against evolution and his belief in god/the creator/jesus is undone by his own logic used in the argument against evolution.
Pissed on his own chips in my opinion.
Fun to watch though.
Read discussionThought provoking and does make evolution rather flakey. However, his arguments against evolution and his belief in god/the creator/jesus is undone by his own logic used in the argument against evolution.
Pissed on his own chips in my opinion.
Fun to watch though.
18 Jan 2022 21:50:07
Hello all,
I've often wondered about how our money (the tax payer) is spent by our government. Because of covid, furlough schemes, vaccines etc, the UK has had to borrow vast amounts of money. Ultimately, those monetary loans will be serviced by the tax payer and no doubt rising taxes.
The above example set me thinking about other stuff.
My 36 mile commute to work (by car) bares the scars of the HS2 project. The budget for HS2 initially started at £32bn in 2012, by 2015 it increased to £56bn and now has an estimated cost of £107bn. Firstly, how could the costs be so wrong and why haven't heads rolled for such piss poor costings?
Secondly, it has been announced that the last leg of the project has been scrapped.
What i'm yet to hear, are the costs will be altered accordingly. So i can only assume that the contractors are going receive 100% of the budget for 75% of the job? (I obviously include those whom line pockets or who's pockets are lined)
Then in the next breath, expect us to pick up "the tab" for more misappropriation of our cash, i.e. covid related funding.
How / when did the fact that the government are OUR employees get turned around to the point they outwardly behave like we work for them?
We all know we are being squeezed financially to support the elite and their goals but, do you think things are far too advanced in their favour to really bring about change for 99%?
06 Jan 2022 23:44:01
I lack knowledge of legal process, but i pray (to whom i don't know)that the updates provided by MS et al, do not jeopardise any legal / criminal proceedings.
After my recent post where i expressed the feeling of being helpless in informing the everday folk of the vital information they need to know, its warming to see that the vaccine issue is getting its roots into officialdom, albeit very slowly and presumably with every obstacle that can be used to hinder progress chucked in its path.
I will be sending an email or two to Sky and the BBC.
This is our chance to stress the small cracks and create larger fractures.
I hope everyone who frequents this site will join in and give this issue the momentum it needs to keep moving forward.
Peace and love.
Toots
Read discussionI lack knowledge of legal process, but i pray (to whom i don't know)that the updates provided by MS et al, do not jeopardise any legal / criminal proceedings.
After my recent post where i expressed the feeling of being helpless in informing the everday folk of the vital information they need to know, its warming to see that the vaccine issue is getting its roots into officialdom, albeit very slowly and presumably with every obstacle that can be used to hinder progress chucked in its path.
I will be sending an email or two to Sky and the BBC.
This is our chance to stress the small cracks and create larger fractures.
I hope everyone who frequents this site will join in and give this issue the momentum it needs to keep moving forward.
Peace and love.
Toots
30 Dec 2021 01:17:30
Thank you Ed.
This is a massive subject to get my noodle around and will take months if not years to digest and get to comprehensive understanding.
As with all things, it is wise to see what else is published on this topic. After a quick web search, i found lots of sites that discredit the common law / sovereign movement.
This has been my very first exposure to the topic and there is a mountain to climb, but i already have a feeling this is something that comes with great danger and anyone who has a situation they feel can be resolved through common law, should proceed with great caution.
This is a game for those with absolute understanding only me thinks.
Rest well Ed032 and thank you for your helpful and informed responses to my posts since my return to this site.
Toots.
Read discussionThank you Ed.
This is a massive subject to get my noodle around and will take months if not years to digest and get to comprehensive understanding.
As with all things, it is wise to see what else is published on this topic. After a quick web search, i found lots of sites that discredit the common law / sovereign movement.
This has been my very first exposure to the topic and there is a mountain to climb, but i already have a feeling this is something that comes with great danger and anyone who has a situation they feel can be resolved through common law, should proceed with great caution.
This is a game for those with absolute understanding only me thinks.
Rest well Ed032 and thank you for your helpful and informed responses to my posts since my return to this site.
Toots.
29 Dec 2021 23:55:45
The recent posts with videos on common law and being sovereign have twisted my melon big time.
In the video above, Charlie Ward says he knows people who no longer pay taxes and have registered as living souls. So far as i undestand it (and thats not very well), that would mean obtaining a licence or entering into a contract to be able to have such a status. With what entity is such a licence obtainable and doesn't such a thing rub against what is being said?
For instance, amongst these videos, its said how you can nullify the duristriction of a police officer if you have been stopped for a driving offence or whatever if you envoke your sovereignty and common law.
I am to believe that these people would not turn to the police if they had been assulted or their property damaged etc? And if the police find the perpretrator, what happens if they invoke their sovereignty and common law???
If one does not pay taxes (albeit in understand its an unfair mechanism) what is their contribution to the services that they must use in their existance???
The above is pretty weak i know, but I'm totally confused.
I'm far from saying things are perfect now but, If everyone was to adopt common law / sovereign practices, how would anything work?
Read discussionThe recent posts with videos on common law and being sovereign have twisted my melon big time.
In the video above, Charlie Ward says he knows people who no longer pay taxes and have registered as living souls. So far as i undestand it (and thats not very well), that would mean obtaining a licence or entering into a contract to be able to have such a status. With what entity is such a licence obtainable and doesn't such a thing rub against what is being said?
For instance, amongst these videos, its said how you can nullify the duristriction of a police officer if you have been stopped for a driving offence or whatever if you envoke your sovereignty and common law.
I am to believe that these people would not turn to the police if they had been assulted or their property damaged etc? And if the police find the perpretrator, what happens if they invoke their sovereignty and common law???
If one does not pay taxes (albeit in understand its an unfair mechanism) what is their contribution to the services that they must use in their existance???
The above is pretty weak i know, but I'm totally confused.
I'm far from saying things are perfect now but, If everyone was to adopt common law / sovereign practices, how would anything work?
29 Dec 2021 14:40:02
Thank you Ed032, Lavers and Tj70 for your replies.
I have to say, its good to be back here.
I was not aware as Ed says, about the acts to gag and potential prison sentance for harming the government in matters it sees as not in the public interest.
Since tuning myself out a few years ago and with coming back to these pages just over a week ago, it is already plain to me there is an abundance of matters i need to reacquaint / re-educate on. With your help, it'll be a fascinating learning curve i'm sure.
As a side note, you'll have to take this as anecdotal as i've nothing official and signed but...
..Two years ago, i was diagnosed with a rare blood cancer (Polycythaemia Vera), my disease requires regular monitoring.
I have blood tests every 7 weeks and a review with my consultant every 8 weeks. My treatment is based around those two actions.
Until recently i can honestly say i have received gold standard care. In August, i was asked by my consultant if i was vaccinated. I told her that i was not and will never take up the "offer" of vaccination.
My September test/review/treatment went as normal.
Novembers tests, review and possible need for treatment have not occured and i'm now 6 weeks overdue with no correspondance as to why.
Is it possible i'm being neglected due to my vaccination status?
Read discussionThank you Ed032, Lavers and Tj70 for your replies.
I have to say, its good to be back here.
I was not aware as Ed says, about the acts to gag and potential prison sentance for harming the government in matters it sees as not in the public interest.
Since tuning myself out a few years ago and with coming back to these pages just over a week ago, it is already plain to me there is an abundance of matters i need to reacquaint / re-educate on. With your help, it'll be a fascinating learning curve i'm sure.
As a side note, you'll have to take this as anecdotal as i've nothing official and signed but...
..Two years ago, i was diagnosed with a rare blood cancer (Polycythaemia Vera), my disease requires regular monitoring.
I have blood tests every 7 weeks and a review with my consultant every 8 weeks. My treatment is based around those two actions.
Until recently i can honestly say i have received gold standard care. In August, i was asked by my consultant if i was vaccinated. I told her that i was not and will never take up the "offer" of vaccination.
My September test/review/treatment went as normal.
Novembers tests, review and possible need for treatment have not occured and i'm now 6 weeks overdue with no correspondance as to why.
Is it possible i'm being neglected due to my vaccination status?
27 Dec 2021 17:31:01
Hello all, not been here for a few years but all this covid BS is driving me mad, so i thought i'd come and see what the open minded, awake folk here have been saying.
Over the last week i've read many of the posts, linked web pages and watched videos that have been contributed by this community.
I am staggered by the amount of evidence that is out there from respectable, credible and expert people that are on the record in fighting and exposing the biggest scam on the worlds poulation.
Yet it seems to be lost cause at the moment.
It angers me, that to a large extent, these people are only finding a voice on specialist sites or social media platforms, all of which damages the credibilty of their evidence.
Given the huge amount of individuals and organisations involved in the mammoth scandal, i'm in disbelief that major press outlets are not reporting on the hugely important information.
I would have thought the gutter press would be all over it, the scandal element alone could bring down polititions, advisors to the government and others that have played a part in this fantasy. Its right up their street and their publication sales would go through the roof and would continue for ages....I just don't get it.
What maddens me more, is i feel helpless, powerless, to do something that will assist in bringing the truth to those who have fallen for this scam hook line and sinker.
Even with the growing number of people protesting, marching etc across the world, it seems to be making no difference, if anything its helping divide people. Anyone who does not agree with the vaccine rollout and/or the motives of those who are inflicting restrictions on us, are just portrayed as conspiracy theorists, fools, irresponsible and so on.
What will it take to get the channels that the ordinary people listen to, to start reporting and informing the truth.
If The Sun for example was to publish the population of the UK has been lied to and have had their health put at risk and 50 odd million people have been part of a harmful clinical experimemt,that alone would turn the tide. It would not be long before people wanted blood.
FFS, how do we blow this thing wide open and bring the bastards and their agendas down?