14 Sep 2013 00:27:33
Can someone tell me why people think 9/11 was a plot and that it was a missile with a holophram or something, it was Osama bin laden flying a plane into a building, that's all, no conspiracies. Tell me some proof why this isn't true, one reason and proof why it wasn't a plane, then tell me why it was a missile or something
Thx
Gobblemaster
{Ed033's Note - I guess you selectively read stuff on this page and you believe anything the mainstream media tells you.
If you're interested in 9/11, instead of asking for proof on 9/11 related stuff, you have to do 1 of 2 things for an over-abundance of proof that the official story is bogus.
Either read Dr. Judy Wood's book 'Where did the towers go' or
go to http://richplanet.net/starship.php and watch all the Andrew Johnson and Dr. Judy Wood video interviews about 9/11
If you're interested in 9/11, instead of asking for proof on 9/11 related stuff, you have to do 1 of 2 things for an over-abundance of proof that the official story is bogus.
Either read Dr. Judy Wood's book 'Where did the towers go' or
go to http://richplanet.net/starship.php and watch all the Andrew Johnson and Dr. Judy Wood video interviews about 9/11
Gobblemaster, how did you even find this site mate it seems you wouldn't dare question what the media tells you! Anyway I found the 'Loose Change' documentaries very interesting as well. There is so much proof out there it's frightening. I mean how the powers that be get away with such lies is beyond me despite the amount of evidence! I guess the fact they own and control the media who in turn control small minded people who can't think for themselves helps them get away from being caught! Love this site btw guys I'm always checking it out. Keep up the good work all contributors!
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Maybe you're just being a bit tongue in cheek saying it was Osama Bin Laden, and if so fair enough.
But just in case you're genuinely curious about what really happened that day, watch September Clues & September Clues Addendum, by Simon Shack. They're both available online. They're probably the most comprehensive documentaries on the no plane theory available, along with the Judy Wood book and interviews.
Study the evidence. The 'no plane' theory sounds absurd at first, but if there were no planes in Shanksville, and at the Pentagon, it's not unreasonable to at least consider the evidence for no planes at the WTC 1 & 2.
According to Shack, there was a 17-second delay between the attacks and the screening of the footage, long enough for passenger planes to be inserted into the film. He reveals technical glitches in the footage of the jets hitting the towers.
Various shots from both the TV footage and alleged 'amateur cameramen' show United Airlines Flight 175
disappearing into the South structure like a ghost.
If you study the footage of the so called 2nd plane strike, you have to ask yourself how can an alleged plane hit a massive building and scythe straight through it and the nose cone comes out the other side of the building completely intact? Through 208 feet of steel and concrete and keep it's shape?
But if you want to believe it was Bin Laden, then you must believe that Satam Al Suqamis passport really survived a blast that melted a commercial jet and reduced a skyscraper to dust, and was miraculously found intact nearby. Maybe YOU could prove how that can happen?
You might also want to believe that it was mere coincidence that NORAD was running a drill of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and the Pentagon on the morning of 911.
You might also want to explain how WTC7 fell in 6. 9 seconds (virtually freefall speed) despite not being hit by an aircraft. Larry Silverstein (the recent buyer of the WTC) is on the record as saying 'we made the decision to pull tower 7'. So did they just stroll into tower 7 with explosives while all around them towers 1 & 2 were exploding? And then set the charges in a matter of hours, when demolition experts say this job take weeks?
Maybe you can also explain why the WTC complex was completely shut down for 3 days only three weeks before 911 allegedly to install internet cables?
Why not offer us some proof of your theory if you're so sure?
Ryan.
But just in case you're genuinely curious about what really happened that day, watch September Clues & September Clues Addendum, by Simon Shack. They're both available online. They're probably the most comprehensive documentaries on the no plane theory available, along with the Judy Wood book and interviews.
Study the evidence. The 'no plane' theory sounds absurd at first, but if there were no planes in Shanksville, and at the Pentagon, it's not unreasonable to at least consider the evidence for no planes at the WTC 1 & 2.
According to Shack, there was a 17-second delay between the attacks and the screening of the footage, long enough for passenger planes to be inserted into the film. He reveals technical glitches in the footage of the jets hitting the towers.
Various shots from both the TV footage and alleged 'amateur cameramen' show United Airlines Flight 175
disappearing into the South structure like a ghost.
If you study the footage of the so called 2nd plane strike, you have to ask yourself how can an alleged plane hit a massive building and scythe straight through it and the nose cone comes out the other side of the building completely intact? Through 208 feet of steel and concrete and keep it's shape?
But if you want to believe it was Bin Laden, then you must believe that Satam Al Suqamis passport really survived a blast that melted a commercial jet and reduced a skyscraper to dust, and was miraculously found intact nearby. Maybe YOU could prove how that can happen?
You might also want to believe that it was mere coincidence that NORAD was running a drill of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and the Pentagon on the morning of 911.
You might also want to explain how WTC7 fell in 6. 9 seconds (virtually freefall speed) despite not being hit by an aircraft. Larry Silverstein (the recent buyer of the WTC) is on the record as saying 'we made the decision to pull tower 7'. So did they just stroll into tower 7 with explosives while all around them towers 1 & 2 were exploding? And then set the charges in a matter of hours, when demolition experts say this job take weeks?
Maybe you can also explain why the WTC complex was completely shut down for 3 days only three weeks before 911 allegedly to install internet cables?
Why not offer us some proof of your theory if you're so sure?
Ryan.
{Ed001's Note - more importantly, if anyone could explain why towers that are specifically designed to deal with a plane strike, as all high buildings in New York have to be, were so easily destroyed by planes hitting them? In fact, the damage is so extensive that it destroys a nearby tower that wasn't hit, or even claimed to have been hit. That seems to be something that deserves an explanation and/or proof.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
I am sorry but watched the september clues films and there is nothing there apart from somebody trying to convince people that it was a hoax.
I have no doubt that the american government knew there was going to be an attack but if you think that no planes crashed into the towers you are seriously deluded.
Marky Mark
I have no doubt that the american government knew there was going to be an attack but if you think that no planes crashed into the towers you are seriously deluded.
Marky Mark
{Ed033's Note - it turns out that september clues was rubbish, so what. Dr Judy Wood's book, 'where did the towers go' is not rubbish, why not read that book?
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0