27 Oct 2013 10:25:13
9/11 cover up story is so pathetic, so so bad, is there any one left who still believes that it was 'planes'?
Aron
Yes there are people all around the world who still believe including probably most of the population of the United States.
Supasub
Supasub
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Supasub you would be surprised, for instance they done a poll in new york about 9/11 and it was 60/40 that the government were not telling them everything, don't forget mainstream media would never put that a majority of people thought 9/11 being an inside job.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, but there is a world of difference between what actually happened on 911 and the government not telling people everything they know about 911.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
I think if I can remember edd the poll was on the line of "do you think our government is hiding major facts about 9/11? even if part of the 60% do not think there government was not involved, it still makes people question what they are getting told which can only be good.
{Ed033's Note - yes, all i'm saying is 9/11 is way beyond, what virtually everyone thinks actually happened
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
28 Oct 2013 08:55:42
How ridiculous, it's clear that when the massive jumbo jet hit the buildngs steal beams and the fuel warped them, the sheer weight of the building came Down, boom boom boom as the top crushed down and eliminated the rest of the building.
Gobblemaster
How ridiculous, it's clear that when the massive jumbo jet hit the buildngs steal beams and the fuel warped them, the sheer weight of the building came Down, boom boom boom as the top crushed down and eliminated the rest of the building.
Gobblemaster
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Just as ridiculous as a plane doing that to the building put out of all that destruction and a pristine passport survivors the carnage.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
@Gobblemaster
Nonsense my friend, your explanation is a repetition of the 9/11 Commission Report. Your belief that this can actually happen is merely a figment of your imagination. Please read this link
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/newtlaws/
If you still cannot accept that the official explanation is nonsense, this video explains why
Psychologists Explain 911 Denial
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pGbEJ3pXwWM
MrTrotskysGhost
Nonsense my friend, your explanation is a repetition of the 9/11 Commission Report. Your belief that this can actually happen is merely a figment of your imagination. Please read this link
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/newtlaws/
If you still cannot accept that the official explanation is nonsense, this video explains why
Psychologists Explain 911 Denial
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pGbEJ3pXwWM
MrTrotskysGhost
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Just returned from New York on my stag do (or bachelor party as it's known over there!). I hadn't visited ground zero in a few years so it was on my to-do list.
Just to explain my position. I 100% believe that there is a huge cover up regarding this disaster. I find the black technology theories, the balls up the media made whilst reporting the incident and there are many more. But myself, the thing that gets me the most is tower 7. Why/how did it fall. The manner in which it fell (straight collapse on itself). Silverstein's comments afterwards about 'pulling it". The BBC reporting its collapse whilst the building was still standing in camera shot!
I went to Ground zero with the intention of asking locals/tour guides/police officers etc about my suspicions. But on arriving, and taking a tour of the new 9/11 museum, the emotion got the better of me and all thoughts of conspiracy went out the window. That night I did try to school a couple of my fellow Irish buddies on my opinion on what actually happened and was surprised by their curiosity and intrigue.
So I would agree with the statistic. I believe that the vast majority of people feel that we are being kept in the dark about something. The confusing thing is what exactly.
P. s. Talking to a friend of mine who works high up in the insurance racket in New York told me that the new buildings on the world trade site have not been proving too popular with regards companies purchasing floors/office space. For obvious reasons,
So the powers that be (Silverstein et al) have decided to change the name. You probably all know the first building which is nearing completion was called 'The freedom tower' (I certainly did!). Well it now has renamed the WTC1. Just goes to show that money really does triumph all!
Sorry for the long post
Just to explain my position. I 100% believe that there is a huge cover up regarding this disaster. I find the black technology theories, the balls up the media made whilst reporting the incident and there are many more. But myself, the thing that gets me the most is tower 7. Why/how did it fall. The manner in which it fell (straight collapse on itself). Silverstein's comments afterwards about 'pulling it". The BBC reporting its collapse whilst the building was still standing in camera shot!
I went to Ground zero with the intention of asking locals/tour guides/police officers etc about my suspicions. But on arriving, and taking a tour of the new 9/11 museum, the emotion got the better of me and all thoughts of conspiracy went out the window. That night I did try to school a couple of my fellow Irish buddies on my opinion on what actually happened and was surprised by their curiosity and intrigue.
So I would agree with the statistic. I believe that the vast majority of people feel that we are being kept in the dark about something. The confusing thing is what exactly.
P. s. Talking to a friend of mine who works high up in the insurance racket in New York told me that the new buildings on the world trade site have not been proving too popular with regards companies purchasing floors/office space. For obvious reasons,
So the powers that be (Silverstein et al) have decided to change the name. You probably all know the first building which is nearing completion was called 'The freedom tower' (I certainly did!). Well it now has renamed the WTC1. Just goes to show that money really does triumph all!
Sorry for the long post
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Macko great post mate.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Cheers Franky!
One other thing that I didn't know. Not sure if you or any of the eds had heard of either.
You probably knew that Silverstein had a huge insurance claim on world trade centre. But when he went to collect he looked for double the payout. The reason? 2 planes = 2 incidents! Crazy s***, I know! Sickening things is he won. He got double his money!
And ****ed up the whole insurance game in America because every insurance refused to give 'Terrorism Insurance' on buildings!
Well that was up until a couple of years ago, when they started to do this again! But the insurance premium is almost 100% of the value of the building itself! Hence the reason my mate is high up in the insurance game. He works for the first company to come up with that idea!
One other thing that I didn't know. Not sure if you or any of the eds had heard of either.
You probably knew that Silverstein had a huge insurance claim on world trade centre. But when he went to collect he looked for double the payout. The reason? 2 planes = 2 incidents! Crazy s***, I know! Sickening things is he won. He got double his money!
And ****ed up the whole insurance game in America because every insurance refused to give 'Terrorism Insurance' on buildings!
Well that was up until a couple of years ago, when they started to do this again! But the insurance premium is almost 100% of the value of the building itself! Hence the reason my mate is high up in the insurance game. He works for the first company to come up with that idea!
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
He got 4. 55 billion from an investment of 3. 2, and was actually demanding a lot more. He had to settle for a profit of 1. 35 billion on a property he owned for 48 days. We should have a whip round for the poor fella.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Yeah mate I knew silverstein went for the double whammy, its a bit like your car being bumped by another car and as you try to avoid the first car you get hit by a another car then make two claims of the two cars, only in america eh?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0