29 Nov 2013 17:56:01
Currently researching Disney and the theories that the company intentionally corrupts the minds of children with influences such as extreme thinness, racism and subliminal messaging present in both the shows and even more so the films from the 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s. Anyone got an opinion on this?
{Ed007's Note - I've read a lot of the stuff about Disney and there is something very strange going on there:
www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_disney_bloodlinept1.htm
www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Disney/Perverts.html
theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/32979
goo.gl/md5lRZ
There is LOADS to read up on mate and it is something that has really got me hooked as in I will have a snoop about whilst waiting on something etc. I also think it is a good place to start for some people just getting into conspiracies or the whole Illuminati thing, it is informative enough and the 'famous' factor keeps you interested through some tough reading.}
www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_disney_bloodlinept1.htm
www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Disney/Perverts.html
theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/32979
goo.gl/md5lRZ
There is LOADS to read up on mate and it is something that has really got me hooked as in I will have a snoop about whilst waiting on something etc. I also think it is a good place to start for some people just getting into conspiracies or the whole Illuminati thing, it is informative enough and the 'famous' factor keeps you interested through some tough reading.}
I think it's more than just Disney, it's the movie industry as a whole. The reason it is more evident in the case of Disney, is because its programming is intended for children.
I think it all began with Edward Bernays. Propaganda became public relations and soon after, companies started hiring psychologists to design their advertisements. They were interested in influencing people on buying products irrelevantly of quality, functionality or necessity. The establishment however, took it a step further.
Television was created, advertisements became commercials and propaganda moved from the radio to the film.
The establishment began to dismantle the education system on a global scale, making peoples analytical thinking more alike, turning them into one target. Ignorance and insecurity became rampant.
Nowadays, public relations is called entertainment. All those triggers instilled in us during our formal "education" years (read mass programming) are exploited and reaffirmed on a daily basis. It is evident, that movie scripts are not chosen on the basis of constructive imagination, philosophical wealth and inspiration to serve the commons.
On the other hand, anyone can write a book. It does not take a large budget to create and there is no need for establishment approval for it be globally available.
Zari
I think it all began with Edward Bernays. Propaganda became public relations and soon after, companies started hiring psychologists to design their advertisements. They were interested in influencing people on buying products irrelevantly of quality, functionality or necessity. The establishment however, took it a step further.
Television was created, advertisements became commercials and propaganda moved from the radio to the film.
The establishment began to dismantle the education system on a global scale, making peoples analytical thinking more alike, turning them into one target. Ignorance and insecurity became rampant.
Nowadays, public relations is called entertainment. All those triggers instilled in us during our formal "education" years (read mass programming) are exploited and reaffirmed on a daily basis. It is evident, that movie scripts are not chosen on the basis of constructive imagination, philosophical wealth and inspiration to serve the commons.
On the other hand, anyone can write a book. It does not take a large budget to create and there is no need for establishment approval for it be globally available.
Zari
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Pedophilla is connected to every conspiracy you can name one way or another and I don't think the average person on the street realises that kids are getting sold go missing get molested every day,
now try and get your head around this,
a million documented cases of kids go missing around the world each year, and that's just documented but you hardly hear of it, now imagine if it was say 1 million jewish people or roman catholics go missing each year, it would make news, so why is it ignored?think about it, its like the worst holocaust every year, 1 million kids never seen again.
i fear all around the world the kabal who want a new world order are the satanic leaders who have the power to keep this quiet and in my opinion we do not know how big this ring is and how powerful it goes up to.
now try and get your head around this,
a million documented cases of kids go missing around the world each year, and that's just documented but you hardly hear of it, now imagine if it was say 1 million jewish people or roman catholics go missing each year, it would make news, so why is it ignored?think about it, its like the worst holocaust every year, 1 million kids never seen again.
i fear all around the world the kabal who want a new world order are the satanic leaders who have the power to keep this quiet and in my opinion we do not know how big this ring is and how powerful it goes up to.
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
Some time ago I was discussing these mysterious child abductions with someone and he told me this hard to believe theory.
He said that the establishment has made a deal with inner-terrestrial beings, allowing them to abduct humans in exchange for technology.
These beings were not only conducting genetic experiments, but were also using children as vessels for their souls.
There were some other parts as well, but it just made it more confusing. I found it as peculiar then as I do now, but since this subject was brought up I thought I might as well put it out there.
Zari
He said that the establishment has made a deal with inner-terrestrial beings, allowing them to abduct humans in exchange for technology.
These beings were not only conducting genetic experiments, but were also using children as vessels for their souls.
There were some other parts as well, but it just made it more confusing. I found it as peculiar then as I do now, but since this subject was brought up I thought I might as well put it out there.
Zari
{Ed033's Note - This sounds like the alleged deal between the US government and the greys who allegedly live under the Archuleta Mesa, Dulce. Abductions for technology.
It's still baffling why anybody believes any government has any automatic authority over them, period, let alone to 'allow' abductions.
It's still baffling why anybody believes any government has any automatic authority over them, period, let alone to 'allow' abductions.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Well for what its worth I believe the majority of abductions and sacrifices that happen are done by satanic leaders who run the kabul because since we have walked the earth they have known about alien beings taking people the majority children and I reckon that they think it gives exterrestrials more power or like zari mentioned something to do with our souls.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
01 Dec 2013 02:26:40
Not that these things you speak of aren't real, Zari - not at all; but that they can largely serve as a cover story for bad people. pea
Not that these things you speak of aren't real, Zari - not at all; but that they can largely serve as a cover story for bad people. pea
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Ed033, he was specifically talking about inner-terrestrial beings. Like in the hollow earth theory.
Also, quite irrelevantly to what you and I think, the establishment considers us as a resource.
Our names in capital letters on our birth certificates, with our footprints beneath, are legal documents establishing corporations in our names that are under the control of our governments.
It may be illegal for them to use physical entities as a commodity, but corporate ones are fair game.
They calculate the average life span, over the average income and quantify what we are likely to produce during our lifetimes. This is simply one type of derivative.
These derivatives are then leveraged, more money goes in circulation and debt ceilings rise.
Ever wander why national debt is calculated as debt per capita? That is why.
Zari
Also, quite irrelevantly to what you and I think, the establishment considers us as a resource.
Our names in capital letters on our birth certificates, with our footprints beneath, are legal documents establishing corporations in our names that are under the control of our governments.
It may be illegal for them to use physical entities as a commodity, but corporate ones are fair game.
They calculate the average life span, over the average income and quantify what we are likely to produce during our lifetimes. This is simply one type of derivative.
These derivatives are then leveraged, more money goes in circulation and debt ceilings rise.
Ever wander why national debt is calculated as debt per capita? That is why.
Zari
{Ed033's Note - Just as a general note to put out there (and not necessarily a response to Zari), people should realise that no one else can 'trick' you into a contract and all 'legal' means is; in compliance with government legislation. Just because something is legal, that doesn't mean it's lawful and that legislation has us all in binding contracts. It's ludicrous for anyone to think that just because someone puts a babies inked footprints on a piece of paper, that somehow binds the baby into a contract for the rest of their life. It's also ludicrous to think that all commercial activity is controlled by governments.
Obviously governments are used as tools by the ruling class and governments just assume that we will all go along with their fraud and those that don't can be dealt with.
Obviously governments are used as tools by the ruling class and governments just assume that we will all go along with their fraud and those that don't can be dealt with.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Sorry for hijacking this discussion OP.
Ed033, people get tricked into contracts all the time. Put anything that constitutes a unique identifier on an agreement and in most countries it is accepted by court as equivalent to a signature. There are countries under British law where blood, fingerprints and footprints are used instead of signatures. As there are no age limits on representing yourself, courts expect and will force you to honor your signature.
Laws were put in place by people who do not care about the well being of society as a whole.
The words lawful and legal are synonymous. However, neither have anything to do with justice.
One can be as unjust as they wish. If on the other hand, one does something illegal/unlawful then violence, or the threat of violence, always ensues from a tool of the establishment.
As for governments, they have a corporate side to them and above certain levels, are run as corporations. In the USA's case this began with the Act of 1871. That is when the United States federal entity, created the UNITED STATES corporation. When I use the word establishment I am not referring neither to government nor governance. Just as you said, these are but tools in the hands of the establishment.
Zari
Ed033, people get tricked into contracts all the time. Put anything that constitutes a unique identifier on an agreement and in most countries it is accepted by court as equivalent to a signature. There are countries under British law where blood, fingerprints and footprints are used instead of signatures. As there are no age limits on representing yourself, courts expect and will force you to honor your signature.
Laws were put in place by people who do not care about the well being of society as a whole.
The words lawful and legal are synonymous. However, neither have anything to do with justice.
One can be as unjust as they wish. If on the other hand, one does something illegal/unlawful then violence, or the threat of violence, always ensues from a tool of the establishment.
As for governments, they have a corporate side to them and above certain levels, are run as corporations. In the USA's case this began with the Act of 1871. That is when the United States federal entity, created the UNITED STATES corporation. When I use the word establishment I am not referring neither to government nor governance. Just as you said, these are but tools in the hands of the establishment.
Zari
{Ed033's Note - You can't be 'tricked' into a contract otherwise it's not a contract. Mostly, when anyone goes into a 'court', a court is not being held but they're actually walking into an administrative hearing where the administrator or executor de son tort can make any decision they like.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I believe you can be tricked into a contract, and the establishment do this not with your birth certificate, but with joinder, when you are invited or "summoned" to a civil or "magistrates" court, they ask you for your name, when they do this they are actually asking for you to represent the legal fiction, or corporation that is on your birth certificate, legal and lawful are not synonymous, you can lawfully refuse to represent that legal fiction, and if you know your stuff and are respectful, then they can only hold your birth certificate, as that is what they are actually asking for. From the moment your mother and father "register" your birth you are technically a member of that company and will be disciplined under the rules or "statutes" of that company. We are all slaves to the United Kingdom Plc, or United States Plc. We are tricked into believing we are free members of that society however we are simply a tool, and a means to an end for the ruling classes. I may not have made a lot of sense in this post but if you look up "John Harris- It's an illusion 2" he's a man who has done his research on the subject and can explain this a lot clearer than I have.
{Ed033's Note - Contract Law 101. In order to form a binding, enforceable contract, there needs to be: intention to contract, offer and acceptance, consideration, negotiation of terms, full disclosure, etc.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I know plenty of ignorant people that didn't read the small letters of a contract or didn't understand the contained legal terms, but signed anyway. Mostly because they were naive. Tricked is a subjective term.
Judges don't get to make any decision they like. They examine the evidence and interpret the law. The evidence shows what they are biased to see, but it is still within the boundaries of law.
You cannot be imprisoned when there is no law stating that what you are being accused of doing is illegal and carries a prison sentence.
I guess the point I am trying to make is, that the establishment abides to certain rules. They use them to their benefit and they don't inform us on what they are, but there are rules none the less.
Larken Rose mentions it in some of his videos.
This might be of interest as well and is full of links, some more useful than others.
http://www.henrymakow.com/defending_yourself_against_leg.html
Zari
Judges don't get to make any decision they like. They examine the evidence and interpret the law. The evidence shows what they are biased to see, but it is still within the boundaries of law.
You cannot be imprisoned when there is no law stating that what you are being accused of doing is illegal and carries a prison sentence.
I guess the point I am trying to make is, that the establishment abides to certain rules. They use them to their benefit and they don't inform us on what they are, but there are rules none the less.
Larken Rose mentions it in some of his videos.
This might be of interest as well and is full of links, some more useful than others.
http://www.henrymakow.com/defending_yourself_against_leg.html
Zari
{Ed033's Note - Sure, if you get yourself into a contract because of ignorance then that's your fault, what I was saying is that without intention to contract, offer and acceptance, consideration, negotiation of terms, full disclosure, etc., there is no contract.
When people who can be a judge walk into work at a court house, they aren't a judge at that point. They are only a judge when they are sworn in under oath as a judge. When they are a judge, they can't make any decision they like, however when we go into 'Magistrates Court', or 'County Court', they aren't under the oath that forces them to act as you said above and therefore they can make any decision they like.
This is why there is so much corruption in 'courts'. If they were always a judge, there wouldn't be the corruption.
When people who can be a judge walk into work at a court house, they aren't a judge at that point. They are only a judge when they are sworn in under oath as a judge. When they are a judge, they can't make any decision they like, however when we go into 'Magistrates Court', or 'County Court', they aren't under the oath that forces them to act as you said above and therefore they can make any decision they like.
This is why there is so much corruption in 'courts'. If they were always a judge, there wouldn't be the corruption.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Full disclosure doesn't force either party to divulge the truth. It simply means they cannot withhold it. It doesn't force them to make it easy to find nor word it in a way it is easy to understand.
As anon said this whole subject is a bit confusing, especially because a lot of these terms carry more weight than we are used to perceive in them, when used in legal context.
To anyone interested, start at admiralty law and make your way through "idem sonans" (sounds alike) to "stramineus Homo" (a substitute put forward as bail or security).
A simple look at the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko#t=84
Zari
As anon said this whole subject is a bit confusing, especially because a lot of these terms carry more weight than we are used to perceive in them, when used in legal context.
To anyone interested, start at admiralty law and make your way through "idem sonans" (sounds alike) to "stramineus Homo" (a substitute put forward as bail or security).
A simple look at the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko#t=84
Zari
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
How does a lawful human being with all god given and amiable rights in tact become a fictional entity or a corporation i.e. a person. No one would willingly give up there human rights, as that is whAt you do when you become a person. The only way they can do this is by deception. Just a quick copy and paste from the first wiki I found on contract law- "If the terms are certain, and the parties can be presumed from their behaviour to have intended that the terms are binding, generally the agreement is enforceable" does that sound like full disclosure to you? Because to me that sounds like a way for the ruling classes to presume our acceptance of there terms without us even having to say a word.
{Ed033's Note - just for your information, it's not "amiable rights" but unalienable rights. Also wikipedia is just someone's opinion so you can't use it as a reliable source.
To answer your main question without getting too deep:
You as a flesh and blood sentient being can't contract with a fictional entity. You can only contract with another flesh and blood sentient being. So you require a fictional entity of your own to contract with a fictional entity like a corporation. This fictional entity that you use as a tool is your Estate which has the same name as you.
Your Estate operates under trust law. 'Courts' and governments use trust law against us where they assume we are the Trustee and they are the Beneficiary and Executor, when it is in fact the other way round. The Executor tells the Trustee what to do for the benefit of the Beneficiary and therefore the Trustee always pays.
You are obviously correct that the ruling classes assume we accept their terms and like I said above, they assume that we will all go along with their fraud and those that don't can be dealt with.
To answer your main question without getting too deep:
You as a flesh and blood sentient being can't contract with a fictional entity. You can only contract with another flesh and blood sentient being. So you require a fictional entity of your own to contract with a fictional entity like a corporation. This fictional entity that you use as a tool is your Estate which has the same name as you.
Your Estate operates under trust law. 'Courts' and governments use trust law against us where they assume we are the Trustee and they are the Beneficiary and Executor, when it is in fact the other way round. The Executor tells the Trustee what to do for the benefit of the Beneficiary and therefore the Trustee always pays.
You are obviously correct that the ruling classes assume we accept their terms and like I said above, they assume that we will all go along with their fraud and those that don't can be dealt with.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I understood that they have to be under oath otherwise they are not bound to follow the law, but I had no idea that Magistrates Court and County Court worked that way. I wonder how many people know that stepping in those court rooms.
To anon
Wikipedia is a tool of the establishment. If you roam through controversial subjects and check the page history, notice what things are altered or simply taken down.
Zari
To anon
Wikipedia is a tool of the establishment. If you roam through controversial subjects and check the page history, notice what things are altered or simply taken down.
Zari
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0