03 Jul 2014 00:36:38 anyone seen thins? look at 1min! Wing of plane o… · #10725

Discussion #10725Talk Sense

03 Jul 2014 00:36:38
anyone seen thins? look at 1min!

Wing of plane on 9/11 disappears behind a building when the wing should be in front of the building

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3NtaDC_ZEo

 

Not Registered
Excellent link. Anyone who thinks it was a real aircraft should watch this.

Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Garbo
Excellent Link, just one question, I've never seen this video before, has anyone else, basically, has this just popped up?
{Ed033's Note - No, this has been around for a year or more. It's been on this web site before.

What people need to figure out regarding the alleged plane is that if you forget everything else, the only thing that matters (regarding the alleged plane) is that the alleged plane was flying faster than it was physically capable of flying at that low altitude, therefore there was no plane that hit the 2nd tower. It was impossible for that plane to fly at that speed at that altitude, therefore there was no plane.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
We're talking structural failure at the speeds given by NIST. 510 knots isn't physically possible at low altitude.

And look at how the plane appears to melt into the building. It should have crumpled badly, and half of it should have fallen to the ground.

If it was real, that is.

Ryan.
{Ed033's Note - yes, so how is it possible when people see the evidence, that they still believe a real Boeing 767 plane flew into the 2nd tower on 9/11?
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Because the deception they have created around 9/11 is so big, that to believe it, people would have to come to the realisation that everything else they are being told by the media and the government may also be a lie. That is simply too much for some people. It is easier to deny the overwhelming evidence, as denial is a very powerful state of mind.

Ryan.
{Ed033's Note - well said Ryan
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Why replicate a drone not commercial plane tho
{Ed033's Note - I don't get exactly what you're saying but they obviously used the best technology they had at the time to make it look like a Boeing 767-222 and obviously the alleged plane that we saw impossibly 'melting' into the 2nd tower at an impossible speed, did not look exactly like a Boeing 767-222 (only similar to it) because it appears in a greyscale colour rather than in full colour as it should (even though the alleged plane is in broad daylight) and it has an extra part on the bottom of it.

If you're interested in 9/11 and haven't seen Richard D. Hall's below video then it's important to watch it

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Posted it on my twitter account, good link.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
an american red
Great link ed
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.