11 Jun 2013 10:01:25 Hey folks what's peoples opinion on cancer, do p… · #11091

Discussion #11091Talk Sense

11 Jun 2013 10:01:25
Hey folks what's peoples opinion on cancer, do people think its man made etc, I'm only asking as when I was a kid I never heard about cancer and I'm in my 30's now and I'm seeing it everywhere both my grandparents died months apart from it, has it opened my eyes to it and that's the case or is it better detection that's highlighted or is made made and used to control the population, I might be wrong here but I sure I read somewhere that we have the cancer gene in us all the time and something happens and it switched on, anyhow cheers

 

Not Registered
11 Jun 2013 14:09:14
i don't think cancer itself is man made but I think we've had an effect on it increasing. It seems to have rocketed up in line with technology. More technology equals more cancer. Especially since phone technology changed. Maybe someone found out how to switch the gene to active? So man made no. But taken advantage of, maybe. Mort {Ed001's Note - I don't think people quite understand what cancer is. It is just a natural gene that has altered to be harmful. So some forms of cancer will be caused by contact with technology, yes. Cancer itself is not man made as such though, it is just something that the human body is affected by that can be caused by man.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
There's doctors and scientists that believe it was man made to reduce the worlds population. I don't have any links to back that up but maybe ed33 will kindly share some knowledge on it.

Crixus.

{Ed033's Note - It was always here but very rare but it's become man made now due to all the carcinogens in substances, lifestyle etc. Of course there are treatments that work. The elitists go to certain hospitals, where they can remove it and stop it. One hospital is in Tijuana in Mexico.


Edgar Cayce successfully gave someone a tonic which was a successful cancer treatment and then a guy called Harry Hoxsey was given Cayce's tonic recipe by his Hoxey's father and started successfully treating people using the tonic and opened up a clinic in Dallas but the authorities shut him down so he moved the clinic to mexico




Dr Tullio Simoncini says cancer is a fungus and treats people with a common anti fungus substance.
Dr Tullio Simoncini part 1 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_nMVShU3U




Dr. Robert Beck says you can clean your blood to treat cancer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMlXd9hLpcY



Dr. Burzynski says people with cancer have a low level of a certain substance which he gives as a treatment

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
The Gerson Miracle, and Dying To Have Known, are two fascinating documentaries on the subject. Both are on YouTube Pk. Ryan.

{Ed033's Note - Yep, thanks Ryan,

Below is another - Rick Simpson's Run From The Cure documentary

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I was thinking about this today. I don't necessarily think that cancel was man made, don't think against that argument either, but I certainly think a cure is and has been obtainable for a long time. But just think what it would mean if cancer was cured. The population growth. Less funds for medical sector, advertising campaigns etc. Less money being feed into 'charities'. More smokers.

I just think if you can produce a pill for a girl that makes sperm ineffectual, you can cure cancer 15 years later.

Melbourne CFC
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I agree with Melbourne there, cancer isn't man made, just radiation & other things that weren't around 200 years ago are now present in our daily lives which cause mutations. There will definitely be a cure for cancer around now, but there's too much money in treating it and failing for drug companies for them to release the cure. That and the world population would absolutely sky rocket!
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
People have been dying of cancers for thousands of years. Cancers sufferers where rarer in the past because medical records did not exist and the population was greatly reduced. With the increase in population comes a noticeable increase in faulty genes. Find and fix these genes and mankind could easily look to a lifespan of 200.

FTE
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
11 Jun 2013 15:42:15
i don't think cancer itself is man made but I think we've had an effect on it increasing. It seems to have rocketed up in line with technology. More technology equals more cancer. Especially since phone technology changed. Maybe someone found out how to switch the gene to active? So man made no. But taken advantage of, maybe. Mort
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
11 Jun 2013 16:28:17
Ed that's what I was trying to say just don't think I explained it very well. It has been around for a long time just very rare. Its growth is a twenty century phenomena. And what's different between now and a century or two ago? The increase in technology. I think someone either by design or accident found how to activate the gene to cause harmful effects and seeded modern life with the activating agents necessary. Chemicals or radiation or whatever. Mort

{Ed033's Note - Yes, "dirty" electricity and the wireless technology affects our bodies in a negative way
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Cancer is actually a bacteria

The italian doctor guy is wrong!

Although Fungus does contribute to Cancer
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.